Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Buyer's Remorse" in South Dakota: Some Republicans who voted for Tim Johnson now wish they hadn't.
National Review Online ^ | December 10, 2002 | Byron York

Posted on 12/10/2002 9:00:22 AM PST by xsysmgr

A new poll, privately conducted for Republicans in South Dakota, suggests that some GOP voters who crossed party lines to vote for Democratic Sen. Tim Johnson are now feeling "buyer's remorse."

Johnson defeated Republican challenger John Thune by 524 votes. During the campaign, Democrats appealed to GOP and independent voters by arguing that a vote for Johnson would be a vote to keep Sen. Tom Daschle as Senate Majority Leader, which would mean more clout for South Dakota in the Senate.

In the end, of course, Democrats lost the Senate and Daschle is set to become Minority Leader.

After the election, pollsters retained by the GOP contacted 500 randomly selected people who had voted in the Senate race. The pollsters found that 17 percent of Republicans and independents said they voted for Johnson. To those people, the pollsters asked, "At the time, the Johnson campaign was saying that a vote for Tim Johnson was a vote to keep Tom Daschle as majority leader in the Senate. Thinking back, how important was the issue of keeping Tom Daschle as majority leader to you — was it very, somewhat, not very, or not at all important?"

Thirty-one percent of the Republicans and independents surveyed said it was a very important factor in their decision to vote for Johnson, and 37 percent said it was somewhat important.

Then the pollsters asked: "If you had known that because of what happened in other states that the Democrats would lose control of the Senate and Tom Daschle would no longer be majority leader, would you have still voted for Tim Johnson, or would you have voted for John Thune?"

The results are another indication of just how close the election was. Ninety-five percent of those surveyed said they still would have voted for Johnson. But five percent said they would have voted for Thune had they known Daschle would no longer be Majority Leader. That would be well over 1,500 voters — more than enough to make Thune the winner on Election Day.

Meanwhile, investigators in the South Dakota attorney general's office are looking into allegations of voting irregularities in last month's election. Several of those allegations are discussed in a new National Review cover story based on the testimony of dozens of Republican poll workers who say they witnessed Democrats engaged in improper and possibly illegal activities at several precincts across the state.

A source in the attorney general's office says many of the allegations — including charges that Democratic poll watchers ran get-out-the-vote operations out of polling places, aggressively coached voters, and engaged in illegal electioneering — are very difficult to prosecute. "First of all," the source says, "they are low-level misdemeanors, assuming they can be proven. And second, they are fairly far down the ladder in terms of whether or not the conduct can be converted into some indication that the returns at the ballot box would be changed."

Investigators are more interested in three affidavits, also discussed in National Review, from people who say Democratic get-out-the-vote van drivers offered them $10 to vote. "Those are, of course, serious allegations," the source says.

Finally, it appears that an indictment will come this week against Becky Red Earth Villeda, the Democratic activist who is suspected of trying to falsify hundreds of absentee ballot applications. In recent weeks, state officials have said they discovered 15 phony ballot requests associated with Villeda and are still investigating 1,700 others. "She was found to be in possession of several hundred absentee ballot applications," a source says. "They had been filled out, with people's names and addresses on them."



TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: South Dakota
KEYWORDS: timjohnson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 12/10/2002 9:00:23 AM PST by xsysmgr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
too late now Morons. Hopefully there is a lot less pork coming your way.
2 posted on 12/10/2002 9:03:09 AM PST by Charlie OK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
That would be well over 1,500 voters — more than enough to make Thune the winner on Election Day.

I have reservations about that claim. The RATS would have needed to dig up 1,500 more dead Indians to vote for Johnson.

3 posted on 12/10/2002 9:07:03 AM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charlie OK
Too bad for South Dakota; I won't be pheasant hunting there until they have two Repubs in the Senate. Sorry, you lose. Rein in the frootloops, South Dakotans! Get your priorities in order. If you're too lazy to vote for Repubs, you'll all get what you deserve!
4 posted on 12/10/2002 9:07:07 AM PST by mallardx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Charlie OK
Idiots.
5 posted on 12/10/2002 9:07:13 AM PST by Arkie2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
And the truth comes out that it wasn't the Red Herring Libertarians but the 'big government 'R's' who turned the election.
6 posted on 12/10/2002 9:10:14 AM PST by JohnGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
Tommy who??? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
7 posted on 12/10/2002 9:11:08 AM PST by teletech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
Stupid is as stupid does. Sounds like they were really socialists anyway.
8 posted on 12/10/2002 9:13:38 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: xsysmgr
Too bad, suckers. You've got a Minority Leader now, about as useless as t*ts on a boar. Deal with it.
10 posted on 12/10/2002 9:13:58 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
The RATS would have needed to dig up 1,500 more dead Indians to vote for Johnson.

Yep, that's why you wait til all the other precincts have been counted before coming up with the reservation returns.

11 posted on 12/10/2002 9:14:14 AM PST by Moosilauke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
Cool cover...


12 posted on 12/10/2002 9:17:22 AM PST by Jaxter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charlie OK
Could one REALLY be considered a republican who would vote for Tom Daschle's little errand boy?
13 posted on 12/10/2002 9:18:00 AM PST by Moby Grape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: floriduh voter
Ping!
14 posted on 12/10/2002 9:20:36 AM PST by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
The DEAD Herring Libertarians also HELPED to put Little Tom's errand boy back into the Senate...the DEAD FISH Libertarians are hurting this country...they serve to help elect democrats, and are good for a laugh when one takes a look at the canidates who dye themselves blue, or have campaign photos with their pet ferretts.
15 posted on 12/10/2002 9:21:22 AM PST by Moby Grape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
Was it a Democrat that said "the only good Indian is a dead Indian?"
16 posted on 12/10/2002 9:24:02 AM PST by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
Well, voting on the basis of peripheral issues turns them into primary issues, there's no getting around that. Shouldn't be a big surprise to anyone.
17 posted on 12/10/2002 9:24:10 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impeach the Boy
That does not hold up using simple political calculus.

An L vote is worth a -1, since according to the theory that Libertarians hurt the GOP, it only counts as a loss of one vote or the equivalent of staying home. A D vote is worth -2, the vote the D gets and the vote you lose.

Now, since Thune moved to the left on Social Security to battle for these either/or voters and lost, what does that say about Thune the politician?
18 posted on 12/10/2002 9:26:31 AM PST by JohnGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
But, but...I thought the Losertarians were responsible for Thune's defeat....NOT!!!
19 posted on 12/10/2002 9:27:38 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
BASTARDS!
20 posted on 12/10/2002 9:27:53 AM PST by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson