Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Davis: $10 billion in cuts (Davi$ Delivers .. doo doo!)
Sac Bee ^ | 12/7/02 | JOhn Hill

Posted on 12/07/2002 1:00:31 PM PST by NormsRevenge

Edited on 04/12/2004 5:46:40 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

The grim and far-reaching consequences of California's budget crisis began to hit home in earnest Friday as Gov. Gray Davis announced $10.2 billion in midyear cuts and other adjustments.

They touch on nearly every facet of state operations, from a boost in state park fees to the elimination of cost-of-living benefit increases for aged, blind and disabled people.


(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: billions; calgov2002; cuts; davis
The headline has not changed much the last few days.

The outcome is still unknown as to what about the other 11 billion dollars not yet accounted for cut or taX increase-wise.
1 posted on 12/07/2002 1:00:31 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Ping
2 posted on 12/07/2002 1:01:06 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Davis and other officials have said the gap, in a general-fund budget expected to exceed $80 billion, is probably several billion dollars bigger.

The socialist demRats and ol' G'ay were intoxicated on the boom times and all the taX and fee monies flowing inti the state coffers from the growing economy and taXed and spent like there could be no end to their largesse.

But, alas, the multiple bubbles of energy crisis and dot.com bust and just pure plain over-indulgence and piss-poor management has left them with nothing but eggs and manure on their faces and hands.

We get the government we pay for. Boy, were we ever snookered the last 4 years tho' when state government grew by leaps and bounds.

Is no one to blame? The demRats run from responsibility for their sordid deeds. Next election folks, think before you vote. This could have been avoided.
3 posted on 12/07/2002 1:10:06 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"It's disappointing that so many of the reductions affect very low-income Californians," McKeever said.

Oh, I don't know. Cutting Medi-Cal payments to doctors by 10% is going to affect them a whole lot more than $20 per month.

4 posted on 12/07/2002 1:11:13 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Personally, I hope the entire state government and all of the programs collapse. I sincerely hope this is pissing off a lot of people. Maybe well get lucky, maybe a few million of the low income folks will leave the state, and the next election, maybe we can elect a true leader.

I say this as it's my part time job to make sure we pay as little tax as possible. We have gotten very creative and damn good at it. I suggest others do the same.

5 posted on 12/07/2002 1:23:56 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Well, there goes the planned state universal health care system.
6 posted on 12/07/2002 1:26:41 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Related article in Sac Bee

Layoffs, student fee hikes among the education options

By Terri Hardy -- Bee Staff Writer
Published 2:15 a.m. PST Saturday, December 7, 2002

Schools and colleges could face layoffs, salary cuts and fee increases as they try to absorb deep budget reductions proposed as a way to close California's yawning budget gap.

Education will bear the brunt of efforts to reduce the deficit, with Gov. Gray Davis on Friday recommending it shoulder $3.8 billion of the total $10 billion in cuts outlined. The Legislature must approve any budget action.

"I don't expect anyone to like these cuts," Davis said. "In times like these, everyone must be part of the solution."

Under Davis' plan, over the next 18 months K-12 schools would receive cuts of $3.1 million, while budgets for state colleges and universities would be reduced $700 million -- with even more cutbacks possible. However, the state will provide additional funding next fiscal year for student enrollment growth, finance officials said.

University of California and California State University officials reacted to the grim news by immediately announcing plans to consider student fee increases that could go into effect as early as January.

The proposed budget cuts come after years of increased funding for schools. As recently as two years ago, Davis gave some of the $12 billion surplus to public schools.

In Davis' past four years, funding for K-12 and community colleges has increased 33 percent, for UC 28.1 percent and for CSU 27.7 percent, said Hilary McLean, a Davis spokeswoman.

Education Secretary Kerry Mazzoni said the across-the-board education cuts of nearly 3.7 percent proposed for K-12 and community colleges were balanced and geared to have minimal impact on classroom instruction.

The sting, she said, would be mitigated by the opportunity for schools to drain their reserves and be allowed greater flexibility in how they spend categorical funding, or money earmarked for special programs.

School officials, however, didn't share her optimistic view.

"These cuts are going to directly impact students in every classroom in California," said Becky Zoglman, a spokeswoman for the California Teachers Association. "It will be devastating, and coming midyear, it's going to be impossible for schools to do."

Locally, Sacramento City Unified School District officials will look at the cuts as an opportunity to get "leaner and meaner," said spokeswoman Maria Lopez.

She said the district wants the chance to choose the way it makes any budget cuts and hopes to target items such as travel, transportation and central office expenditures.

Cutting teachers isn't part of the plan, she said.

"You can cut away the fat, but you can't cut the muscle, and teachers are our muscle," she said. "We don't want to cut programs that will affect our stability or our momentum."

Diana Michel, vice chancellor of governmental relations and external affairs for the California Community Colleges chancellor's office, said the impact of the cuts would be significant.

She stressed that if cuts are made, community college districts should be given the flexibility to decide how to put them in place.

"The districts will be faced with some very serious choices about programs and services," Michel said. "Courses are already planned, we've already hired the faculty."

Mazzoni warned that she anticipates layoff notices will be coming. Asked if schools, community colleges and universities might reopen negotiations with employee unions to reduce salaries, Mazzoni said she "wouldn't rule it out."

She said CSU and UC had the option of raising student fees to offset cuts, while community college fees are set by the Legislature.

Although Davis has said in the past that he was opposed to fee increases, Mazzoni said "the governor has indicated everything is on the table."

The UC Board of Regents next month will consider raising instate student fees $135 for the coming term. The regents raised out-of-state tuition in July.

Davis proposed $74 million in midyear cuts for UC. Targets included libraries, K-12 outreach, student services and certain state-funded research. Additional and even more severe reductions are expected next fiscal year.

Brad Hayward, a UC spokesman, said the university hoped that raising student fees would ensure students a quality education. He did not believe the increases would hurt access because the neediest students would qualify for student aid. If approved, the fee increases would begin with the spring term.

Davis proposed cutting the CSU budget this year by $59.6 million, but noted that the system would have the flexibility of determining how the cuts should be made.

The CSU Board of Trustees will meet this month to look at raising fees as early as January, although the proposed amount was not known Friday, said spokeswoman Colleen Bentley-Adler.

CSU Chancellor Charles B. Reed said in a statement that this year will be challenging for the system, while deep cuts next could mean "a catastrophe."

"We do, however, expect to accommodate our student enrollment for the remainder of the year, and will make every effort to honor our commitment to students to provide classes and services," Reed said.

7 posted on 12/07/2002 1:33:52 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
These stories just crack me up. The deficit is $21.1 billion (actually more) so the state is going to cut $10 billion to remedy the situtation. Isn't that just like big government? Of course taxes will be needed to screw the public over even more.

While necessities like education, medical care and other more bonified places to spend money take it in the shorts, you can bet your ass the Coastal Commission, the NGOs, Liberal programs everywhere won't suffer much.

Cuts: Libraries? Yes. Schools? Yes. Land aquisitions for some conservancy group? Not on your life!!!! The campaign to save the left flippered snail larve existing on the bottom side of same quack's 1953 Studebaker? You must be kidding.

Only the highly visible items that will cause panic among the masses will be cut. There, take that you ungrateful mongeral dogs!

Meanwhile...

Around 1996 I read some interesting statistics provided on the LAUSD web site. At that time over 1/3rd of it's students were the children of illegal immigrants. At that time the LAUSD budget was $9 billion dollars. By now I'm sure it's closer to 10-12 billion, perhaps more.

What I don't get is this. We know where unsupportable spending is going. Schools, healthcare, and other monetary subsidies for illegal immigrants continue unabated. If they don't get the money, all students or healthcare benificiaries suffer. Do we deport or do we all take it in the shorts so they can stay? Ahem...

Mr. President. Mr. Governor. Get off your asses and do your duty.

Gray Davis, cut the liberal programs you've instituted since coming to office. That'll get you a long way toward balancing your budget big fella.

8 posted on 12/07/2002 1:35:23 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Just remember these comments by education leaders the next time reading scores are shown to be as dismal or worse than before. "We can't afford to allow our successes to be reversed..." Bull hockey!
9 posted on 12/07/2002 1:39:38 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
LOL, you don't know liberals very well do you!
10 posted on 12/07/2002 1:40:30 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
For the good of the people, wouldn't you turn over another 20% of your salary? Come on fella, get with the program. It's going to sound wonderful. Just wait...
11 posted on 12/07/2002 1:41:39 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Perhaps they should go back to the budgets of, say, 1996, and use that as the base for current budget planning. This would bypass the boondoggles that they voted for during the bubble times.
12 posted on 12/07/2002 2:52:38 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Simon and the republican party won in CA. In four years CA will be ripe for picking.
13 posted on 12/07/2002 2:56:03 PM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Davis may be a democrat and the democrats have taken over the state but when reality bites, the Republicans are right: you must cut spending.
14 posted on 12/07/2002 3:27:54 PM PST by arielb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
Ready for this?

"State Senator Tom McClintock makes the worthwhile suggestion to require the state budget to grow no faster than the combined rate of inflation and population. If such a spending limit had been in place over the last three years, state spending would still have grown by 13 percent, but instead of a $12.4 billion deficit, the state would be enjoying a $28 billion surplus."
--- pacificresearch.org

It's not revenues, it's spending.

15 posted on 12/07/2002 3:34:07 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; madfly; SeenTheLight; sfwarrior; Saundra Duffy
But what about all those illegal aliens that pay taxes...?

Oh they are mostly WELFARE cases in the state? You don't say!

Remember the STATE donated $7 million to the San Francisco Gay, Lesbian and Transgender BUILDING!

You think they will DEFUND the left? I doubt it. They will continue to give millions/billions to their pork, ie, gay issues, aids issues, BILINGUAL EDUCATION, welfare and medical and schooling for illegal aliens. (BTW, I read it costs the state 8 BILLION dollars a year to fund schooling for illegal aliens!!!!!!!)

Anyways, I voted for Simon, I'm glad. Let the hemorrhaging begin. Repubs will be back in office in 4 years!
16 posted on 12/07/2002 4:47:12 PM PST by I_Love_My_Husband
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
And the other $15B comes from guess where ... new user fees, rescinded tax reductions and new taxes.

Californians should hold their hands over their groins and keep a constant vigil for Davis over their shoulder.

17 posted on 12/07/2002 5:13:46 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Shutting down HALF the state government AND cutting taxes across the board are the two halves of any responsible program to eliminate the state budget deficit and jump-start the stalling economy. Tax increases proposed by the Democrats would kill job growth, dampen consumer spending, and decrease tax revenues down the line, all resulting in an even bigger budget deficit. California is not going to be able to tax its way out of this situation and this time there's no avoiding pain. Spending must be substantially reduced or California will really start sliding into a Depression that will make the one in the 1930s look like a Sunday tea picnic. Its all up to the Democratic leadership in the state at this time - they can be more business friendly as an L.A Times Opinion section article in the Sunday Times suggests or they can be in a fight for political survival two years from now. What it will take however to cure the Dems of their tax and spend mindset remains to be seen.
18 posted on 12/07/2002 11:36:52 PM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; *calgov2002; Grampa Dave; Carry_Okie; SierraWasp; Gophack; RonDog; ElkGroveDan; ...
Thanks for the ping, I have been away for bit!

calgov2002:

calgov2002: for old calgov2002 articles. 

calgov2002: for new calgov2002 articles. 

Other Bump Lists at: Free Republic Bump List Register



19 posted on 12/08/2002 11:32:46 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson