Ninth Circus Will Be Overturned (Rush alert!)

The Ninth Circus Court of Appeals has ruled that the Second Amendment does not apply to individuals but only to government-run militias. This is the same court that said "under God" does not belong in the Pledge of Allegiance. Rest assured, this court will be overturned - yet again.

Again: liberals look at the Constitution, see what's written and deny it's there, or see things that aren't there and put them in. Judge Stephen Reinhardt ruled, "[W]hat the drafters of the amendment thought necessary to the security of a free state was not an unregulated mob of armed individuals such as Shays' band of farmers, the modern-day privately organized Michigan militia, the type of extremist militia associated with Timothy McVeigh..." He says that "well-regulated" confirms that militia can only reasonably be construed as referring to a force established and controlled by government.

If you apply yourself intellectually, you can get pretty close to original intent of the Founding Fathers in documents such as the Federalist Papers. Shays' Rebellion is just a convenient thing for Judge Reinhardt to use. The trick here is saying that the Founders didn't know that the Michigan militia and Timothy McVeigh would pop up. True enough. But he then assumes that if they had known about them, they'd have agreed on banning guns!

This judge believes that you people who support the Second Amendment might as well be Timothy McVeigh. You single women who buy a gun because your ex-husband threatened to kill you, or you shopkeepers and target shooters – you're all Oklahoma City Bombers. (Notice: "bomber," he didn't use a gun.) Reinhardt writes that the phrase "well-regulated" means that militia refers to an established government military, yet he later admits that the Second Amendment was written before the government had a standing army!

If the Constitution meant to ban private arms, George Washington would have dispatched troops to round up guns, wouldn't he? He'd at least have called for them to be turned in. All the proof you need of this amendment's purpose is that Founders would not have existed as free men had they not taken up arms against an oppressive government.

When they won, they had the humility and wisdom to say, "If this new government gets too oppressive, future citizens must have the right to do what we did." Reinhardt is saying that only government has freedom, and only it can grant the people liberty. 100% wrong. The Constitution says what the government cannot do, not what We the People cannot do. Our rights come from a Creator, they wrote, not from other men. The people who founded this nation didn't just say, "Hey, we're independent, so leave us alone, Georgie." They fought to free themselves – and if you doubt it, you should listen to my EIB Primer on Liberty. It's something you have to hear.

I guess that thing that most strikes me is that people with "more book-learning" than me just can't figure it out...

There is a clear distinction between "the people" and "the states." I mean, the two words are used independantly of each other in the Bill or Rights, and in fact, the 10th Amendment clearly makes the distinction... And in the Second Amendment, the two words are again, clearly used:

Therefore, "the people" and "the state" are two, independant entities: Since the wording goes, "... the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed," where's the confusion? It seems to state quite clearly that an armed population is what is meant.

But neither the words or intent of the Founders of this republic mean anything to liberals or the 9th circuit court.

Mark

I had a history teacher a hundred years ago who taught his classes the same thing. That's why, to me, one can argue about what the framers DID but their INTENT only becomes an argument when the parsers of words try to change clearly written language into a jumbled up mish-mash that conforms to their beliefs. In today's world, the parsers are liberals.

You stated it so eloquently even a dummy like moi can comprende.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.