Skip to comments.
Humans In Oregon 10,000 Years Ago
AP/Newsday ^
| 11-25-2002
| Joseph B. Frazier
Posted on 11/25/2002 3:32:34 PM PST by blam
Humans in Oregon 10,000 Years Ago?
By JOSEPH B. FRAZIER
Associated Press Writer
November 25, 2002, 9:31 AM EST
PORTLAND, Ore. -- Researchers have found traces of a human presence on the Oregon coast dating to more than 10,000 years ago, raising the area's importance for those who study the peopling of the Americas.
The findings at the Indian Sands site in Boardman State Park are more than 2,000 years older than previous discoveries along the Oregon coast. The site, about 12 miles north of Brookings, was excavated in August by a team of researchers from Oregon State University.
The discovery, which dates to the end of the last Ice Age, also lends weight to the theory that early inhabitants of the area might have arrived by sea, rather than by land.
.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 10000; ago; humans; oregon; years
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Click on the source for the whole article
1
posted on
11/25/2002 3:32:34 PM PST
by
blam
To: RightWhale
Thanks. I wonder why they didn't put the 12k date in the headline?
2
posted on
11/25/2002 3:33:58 PM PST
by
blam
To: blam
Yes but do we know when they were replaced by the migrants from California.
3
posted on
11/25/2002 3:46:14 PM PST
by
FreePaul
To: FreePaul
Well, maybe we don't know when they were supplanted by Californians, but we do know when the cannibal kings moved in and established their nasty attitudes as the law of the land.
4
posted on
11/25/2002 3:50:04 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: blam
What were they driving?
5
posted on
11/25/2002 3:53:25 PM PST
by
johnny7
To: FreePaul
6
posted on
11/25/2002 4:11:59 PM PST
by
onedoug
To: blam
Roberta Hall may have asked that the smaller number be used in the article since the 12,000 involved recalibrating the data. It may have to do with standards and equipment.
To: blam
They were early democrats.
8
posted on
11/25/2002 4:28:14 PM PST
by
MonroeDNA
To: MonroeDNA
Kennewick Man was no doubt related to these, and as Paul Revere said, BY SEA, BY SEA!
Have you ever met anyone whose ancestors came by land? It was either sea or air.
9
posted on
11/25/2002 4:31:20 PM PST
by
crystalk
To: blam
This will link to the Kennewick man data.
(link)
To: blam; RightWhale
A short distance up the road, in the Gold Beach area, findings like these were documented years ago:
(Early Man, 9000 years ago in Gold Beach)These historians claimed that these early Oregon settlers came down via the connected land mass from the Siberia area to Alaska and then down the West Coast.
To: Grampa Dave
"This will link to the Kennewick man data. (link)"Thanks, let's not leave out his cousin:
Spirit Cave Man
12
posted on
11/25/2002 4:37:38 PM PST
by
blam
To: RightWhale; blam; Ernest_at_the_Beach
To: blam; RightWhale; Ernest_at_the_Beach
Here is the Lycos search link for Kennewick Man:
(Lycos search for Kennewick Man)I'm out of here for awhile. When I get back you guys and others will have nailed down Kennewick Man and the PC foibles that surround him and his cousins in Western America.
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
To: blam; Carry_Okie
!gniP
To: ericwendham
"So this was before the Great Flood, right? " There was a great flood in that area.
17
posted on
11/25/2002 7:05:46 PM PST
by
blam
To: blam; forester
Roberta Hall, an OSU anthropology professor, led the excavation team along with Loren Davis, a geoarchaeologist and anthropology instructor at OSU. Hall said the information will help tribal people, including the Confederated Tribes of Siletz and the Coquille Indian Tribe, learn about their ancestors and the challenges they faced. The tribes are collaborators in the research. Um, what if they aren't?
It would seem that by "collaborating" on the research the tribes might successfully prevent the embarassment of a Kennewick II and the threat that represents to effecting successful legal claims as "indigenous peoples."
To: Carry_Okie
"It would seem that by "collaborating" on the research the tribes might successfully prevent the embarassment of a Kennewick II and the threat that represents to effecting successful legal claims as "indigenous peoples." I real glad to see that you picked up on this bit of information. Chatters in his book (see post #10), says that there are not any skeletons of American Indians/Native Americans (as we know them today) ever found in North America that are older than 6,000 years old. Previous that that, they were the Kennewick Man variety. They should boot these Indians out of this site, it's to old to be 'them.'
19
posted on
11/25/2002 8:54:51 PM PST
by
blam
To: Grampa Dave
It looks like Mr. 'ericwendham' (post #15) made it on FR for four whole days before being banned.
20
posted on
11/25/2002 8:56:54 PM PST
by
blam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson