Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TARGET: Tom Tancredo (Warned "never to darken the door of the White House again.")
Roll Call ^ | November 18, 2002 | Josh Kurtz

Posted on 11/18/2002 6:23:24 PM PST by Mark Felton

November 18, 2002

Target: Tom Tancredo

Some Say GOPPrimary Challenge Likely

By Josh Kurtz He represents one of the most conservative districts in the nation. He just trounced his Democratic challenger by 37 points. Yet Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.) may be one of the most vulnerable incumbents in the 2004 election cycle.

Tancredo, a controversial, outspoken voice for the Republican right who is entering his third term, has angered leading Republicans back home and in the White House.

The House Member's criticisms of President Bush's immigration policy bought him a 40-minute rebuke earlier this year from Bush adviser Karl Rove, who, in the Congressman's own words, warned him "never to darken the door of the White House again." And his decision to renounce his pledge to serve only three terms has infuriated powerful Colorado Republicans, including his political patron, former Sen. Bill Armstrong (R).

"I'll be surprised if he doesn't have a primary [in 2004]," said Floyd Ciruli, an independent Colorado pollster.

Several Republicans, including popular state Treasurer Mike Coffman, who just won a landslide re-election of his own, are considering taking on Tancredo in the '04 primary.

Other potential candidates include state Sen. Jim Dyer (R) and former Arapahoe County Commissioner Steve Ward. "It's a given" that someone will run against the 56-year-old lawmaker, Coffman said. "There are questions about his term-limit pledge. When you have someone like Senator Armstrong, who was his mentor, backing away from him - I think that resonates."

Armstrong was instrumental in getting Tancredo elected in the first place, endorsing him over four strong opponents in a competitive GOP primary to replace retiring Rep. Dan Schaefer (R) in 1998. By Tancredo's reckoning, Armstrong's blessing was worth 3 points at the polls - which just happened to be his margin of victory in the primary.

Even though he may not seek re-election in 2004 - and would consider running for Senate if Sen. Ben Nighthorse Campbell (R) retires - he has chucked the term-limit promise nevertheless.

"The term-limit pledge in and of itself is not the deciding factor if he will run again," said Tancredo spokeswoman Lara Kennedy.

Like all Members who change their minds on term limits, Tancredo has cast his decision as being in the best interests of his district and pet causes. Tancredo wants to preserve his seniority for his suburban district south of Denver and angle for better committee assignments. Plus, he does not want to lose the momentum he has built fighting the government's open immigration policies, Kennedy said. Tancredo is the founder of the House Immigration Reform Caucus.

While plenty of politicians have broken their term-limit pledges before, including Rep. Scott McInnis (R-Colo.), Tancredo's decision is more noteworthy because he once headed Colorado's term-limit organization.

"All too often you have terrific candidates who come to Washington with the best of intentions, but they get too comfortable, and when the time comes, they don't want to go home," lamented Stacie Rumenap, a spokeswoman for U.S.Term Limits.

Whether Tancredo suffers any political damage remains to be seen. So far, the handful of Members who have broken their pledges, including McInnis, have not suffered any consequences at the polls, Rumenap conceded. And U.S.Term Limits is not in the business of recruiting challengers to incumbents who have broken the pledge.

Tancredo has promised to return campaign contributions to donors who are dismayed at his decision to ignore the term-limits pledge. But Armstrong - who did not respond to several messages left at his Denver law office - called the refund offer "hollow," according to The Rocky Mountain News.

Armstrong, meanwhile, has offered some kind words about Coffman.

"Mike Coffman is someone the Republican Party and the people of Colorado will rally around,"he told the News. "There is no doubt in my mind that he will be on the short list for whatever comes along - it could be governor, it could be Senator, it could be Congress."

Coffman, in fact, began running for Congress last year - in the new 7th district, which adjoins Tancredo's. But when the final district lines were drawn, Coffman found himself in Tancredo's 6th district, just a few blocks from the 7th, and chose not to move or run.

Coffman said that while he has not given much thought to the 2004 election yet, he believes that Tancredo will be vulnerable. The three Republicans most frequently mentioned as challengers are all military veterans, while Tancredo is not, and that could make a difference in a district that values military service, political insiders said.

Coffman, a 47-year-old Marine Corps vet who served in Operation Desert Storm, said Tancredo's military deferments during the Vietnam War would hurt him as America prepares to attack Iraq, and could be linked to his decision to ignore the term-limit pledge.

"Here's a guy ordering young men off to war and he himself didn't serve," he said. "I think in this conservative district, something like that could resonate."

Certainly, Tancredo's record would contrast with Coffman's, or Dyer's, who is an Air Force veteran, or Ward's, who is a lieutenant colonel in the Marine Corps Reserves and is on active duty in Florida.

Dyer called it "highly unlikely" that he would challenge Tancredo, but said somebody else might, and predicted that the term-limit issue would sting the incumbent.

"I think a number of people that support Tom are not going to support him if he breaks the term-limit pledge,"said Dyer, who was a surrogate for Tancredo at a candidate forum this fall. "We can't say that situational ethics is bad for party A but not for party B."

Ward, a former mayor of suburban Glendale, could not be reached for comment, but is expected to return to Colorado next year. In an interview with the News after completing his one term on the Arapahoe County Commission, Ward made his opinion of politicians who stay in office too long perfectly clear.

"Any politician who can't find the bathrooms in the first week doesn't deserve to be in public office," he said.

It is unclear whether the White House would try to get involved in a primary challenge to Tancredo.

But it is fair to say that Tancredo is not one of the president's favorite people. Earlier this year, the Congressman accused Bush of pandering to Hispanic voters and trying to prop up Mexican President Vicente Fox by offering amnesty to certain undocumented immigrants. That declaration brought an angry 40-minute phone call from Rove, and Bush pointedly failed to introduce Tancredo to the crowd during a political rally in Colorado in September.

With his hard-line views on immigration, Tancredo is no stranger to controversy. In 1999, he gained publicity for reaffirming his support for gun owners' rights just days after the massacre at Columbine High School, which is six blocks from his house.

The Southern Poverty Law Center released a report last summer linking Tancredo to extremist groups, which the Congressman dismissed as "McCarthyism."

And he was embarrassed earlier this year when it was revealed that undocumented workers had been hired to do some construction work on his Littleton home.

But pollster Ciruli said Tancredo's views on immigration are in line with his constituents'.

"Nobody who's going to argue the soft side of immigration is going to beat him in the Republican primary, or even in the general," he said.

After seeing two fairly viable opponents get wiped out by Tancredo in 1998 and 2000, Democrats appear to have abandoned the 6th district - leaving Republicans there to decide whether they want him to remain in office.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: immigrantlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 1,101-1,115 next last
To: Mark Felton
Anyone who is enemy of The Southern Poverty Law Center is most definitely a friend of mine.
141 posted on 11/18/2002 8:01:33 PM PST by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
I'm with you on this. I like and admire our President, but on this Dubya's missing the crux of the issue. Like, what part of "illegal" doesn't this guy understand?
142 posted on 11/18/2002 8:01:53 PM PST by goody2shooz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: frnewsjunkie
I was at that rally. Tom was one of the warm-up speakers for the President. Tom was not on stage with the president, to my recollection. The only folks on stage were the Governor, and the two national candidates in tight races, Beauprez and Allard. So it would have been weird for Bush to introduce someone not on the stage. It would also have been strange for Tancredo to be on stage but not the other Repub congressional candidates like Musgrave and Chlouber. Why? None of them were in tight races and the stage wasn't big enough for everyone.

The point of that rally was to rouse the troops for Allard and Beauprez, not to snub Tancredo.

Until this article, noone who attended the rally, mentioned to me that they had noticed a snub--and I have talked to a lot of folks about that rally.

143 posted on 11/18/2002 8:02:21 PM PST by ffrancone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
This is too bad. I thought the Republican party was not a herdish walk-in-lock-step to the nearest GOP kool-aid stand kind of party.

144 posted on 11/18/2002 8:02:42 PM PST by harpo11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Well sinkspurt, if you are such a great bush authority, perhaps you can explain why GWB wants open borders with mexico and why he wants to legalize illegal immigrants. I would love to hear your explanation.
145 posted on 11/18/2002 8:03:07 PM PST by fifteendogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Shear
That you seem to be a whacked-out government hating kook

I love my country.

I distrust an ever-expanding government. Especially when it has shown that it trusts our enemies more than its own people.

I hate what has happened to to our government. I'dlike to see things get better.

If that is your definition of a "kook," I wear your label with honor.

146 posted on 11/18/2002 8:03:48 PM PST by Captainpaintball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: deport
April or so of 2000 --s/b --April or so of 2002
147 posted on 11/18/2002 8:04:39 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: APBaer
"never to darken the door of the White House again"

It's time for us to make that same promise - to JORGE Bush and his illegal buddies.

148 posted on 11/18/2002 8:05:25 PM PST by fogarty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball
Bush is, for some reason, dead set against preserving our borders, language and culture.

What utter and complete nonsense.

149 posted on 11/18/2002 8:05:27 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
If Armstrong and Karl Rove oppose him in 2004, he's dead meat.

Rmember what Tip O'Neill said all politics is local. He represents his district, even if it is in a more strident manner than some of us (outside his district) are comfortable with.

150 posted on 11/18/2002 8:05:41 PM PST by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RLK
"The present republican party is in such a condition of brainlessness that putting in charge of this country is like giving a semi-trailor truck to a chimpanzee. The Republicans are Democrats with lower sex drives. "

Ouch!

151 posted on 11/18/2002 8:05:53 PM PST by Mortimer Snavely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
What do you think about Bush then? What about his promise not to sign CFR? What of his promise to end Partial-Birth Abortion? What about his promise to vets?

Every single one of them - lies, spewing from the mouth of One-term Bush.

152 posted on 11/18/2002 8:07:24 PM PST by fogarty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
What utter and complete nonsense.

As evidenced by...?

153 posted on 11/18/2002 8:07:25 PM PST by RodgerD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Tancredo Fan
Hopefully, and in the cesspool del sur he's evidently been pandering to. You know, the one the vast majority of Americans want nothing to do with.

I support tighter borders and am against illegal immigration, and minimizing legal immigration but your rhetoric just paints people like me (unfairly) as racists....and I can't blame them.

154 posted on 11/18/2002 8:09:29 PM PST by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
Look, I like a lot about Tom. I will probably support him in 2004 with money and time. He is raising important issues that someone needs to raise. That said, I think Tom could be a more effective advocate by being less strident. He has the moral high-ground and tends to give it away with the hystrionics.

My beliefs on illegal immigration are not an anti-hispanic thing. And noone (the republican party included) gains by making this an anti-hispanic thing. How this position is taken by the public is largely one of tone. Tom's stridency lets the Denver Post make it into a racial thing, which it is not.

I think Tom has taken some lumps and, hopefully, learned from them. He's very bright and very articulate and could mature into a tremendous spokesman for his cause. Right now, he is raising the right issues but having limited effect because of his style. Today, O'Reilly is doing a LOT more for this cause than Tancredo.

155 posted on 11/18/2002 8:09:46 PM PST by ffrancone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
That is a riot. He is going down. He sounds like that idiot James Traficant.

Did he hire them, or did a construction company? And if he hired them, did he know that they were illegals? or did they have drivers lics (thanks to the libs).

156 posted on 11/18/2002 8:10:54 PM PST by Sci Fi Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Commander8
"And his decision to renounce his pledge to serve only three terms has infuriated powerful Colorado Republicans, including his political patron, former Sen. Bill Armstrong (R)"

Intersting, you will support someone who is known not to go through with his promises.

If Tancredo isn't running for the presidency in 2004, you may want to look into Hillary. She seems to have that quality you admire in a politician.

He lied.

157 posted on 11/18/2002 8:11:09 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
What utter and complete nonsense.

You just wait till those Mexican rustbuckets come barreling down our highways thanks to NAFTA. They WILL be loaded with drugs and illegal aliens, and their lack of safety should cause two, or three, or maybe a thousand accidents.

158 posted on 11/18/2002 8:11:41 PM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: ACAC
You know, if you really want to increase the hispanic vote for republicans, you should be posting in spanish.
159 posted on 11/18/2002 8:12:09 PM PST by fifteendogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: frnewsjunkie
Apparently you have managed to keep yourself ignorant of the NUMEROUS provisions in the Patriot Act and the Homeland Security Bill that deal with protecting the borders.

Tancredo has become the John McCain of immigration and uses it to gain political points for himself at the expense of the president, his party and any real security he insists he wants.

160 posted on 11/18/2002 8:12:40 PM PST by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 1,101-1,115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson