Posted on 11/15/2002 1:16:16 PM PST by Utah Girl
Liberal interests groups pressure Democrats to start a major fight.
On Capitol Hill, there are reports that Senate Democrats are engaged in an increasingly contentious fight among themselves that could shut down the Senate during its busy lame-duck session.
At issue is the nomination of Dennis Shedd to a seat on the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. Liberal senators like Massachusetts Democrat Edward Kennedy have long opposed Shedd, accusing him of being "insensitive" to the rights of minorities. That opposition was enough to keep Shedd's nomination bottled up in the Senate Judiciary Committee for more than a year.
On the other side, Shedd has particularly strong support in some Republican circles because he was a long-time Senate staffer, serving as chief counsel of the Judiciary Committee when it was chaired by South Carolina Republican Strom Thurmond. Several Republicans have interpreted Democratic opposition to Shedd as a slap at the nearly 100-year-old Thurmond as he leaves the Senate.
Shedd was finally approved by the Judiciary Committee on Thursday. Although some had said that chairman Patrick Leahy would allow a vote on Shedd as a gesture of "goodwill," Democrats, including Leahy, used the meeting as an opportunity to attack Shedd before allowing the nomination to pass on a voice vote. Shedd survived because a single Democrat, Delaware's Joseph Biden, had pledged to support him.
After the committee meeting, representatives of the liberal interest groups People for the American Way, Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, Alliance for Justice, and NARAL all urged Democratic senators to continue the fight against Shedd in the full Senate. Wade Henderson, head of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, warned that "controversy will follow these nominations to the Senate floor."
Now, it appears that that is happening. There is word that several Democrats, including Kennedy, Leahy, and Michigan Sen. Carl Levin, are working to organize a filibuster that would prevent a full-Senate vote on the nomination. Such a move would be highly controversial, even among Democrats, because it could tie the Senate up in procedural knots at a time when lawmakers are racing to finish work on the Department of Homeland Security and other measures during the lame-duck session.
It is also an extraordinarily risky move politically. Some Democrats, apparently including Majority Leader Tom Daschle, are worried that a filibuster against Shedd could hurt the election prospects of Louisiana Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu, who faces a runoff election next month. Some Democrats believe that the party's opposition to Bush judicial nominees hurt Democratic candidates in Georgia, Missouri, and Texas, and they believe an anti-Shedd filibuster would add Louisiana to that list.
On the other hand, some key Democrats are said to be worried that a quick confirmation of Shedd would anger the NAACP and other African-American groups that strongly oppose the nomination. The party desperately needs those groups to help in get-out-the-vote efforts in Louisiana, and Democrats are loath to do anything that might alienate them at this crucial time.
At this moment, the situation is in flux, with heated negotiations going on on all sides of the issue. It is unclear how the dispute will be resolved, and insiders believe it might stretch into next week.
There's the line....go ahead and step over it....I dare ya'......
As I understand it, Shedd has an excellent reputation among blacks in his state who know him. The people who currently head the NAACP are not truly representative of blacks, any more than the people who head NOW are representative of American women. In other words, Shedd is not a racist. Rather, these organizations hate anyone who is conservative or pro-life.
Ted Kennedy and all his Democrat friends were blatantly insensitive when Mary Jo Kopeckne sank and drowned while Ted swam away from his car, and now Ted tells all that Shedd is ... "insensitive" to the rights of minorities.
Hypocrisy has never reached higher levels than those we see within the democratic dictator's party.
It is also an extraordinarily risky move politically. Some Democrats, apparently including Majority Leader Tom Daschle, are worried that a filibuster against Shedd could hurt the election prospects of Louisiana Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu, who faces a runoff election next month.
Go ahead Teddy. Keep digging.
By the way, would a filibuster on Shedd stop passage of the homeland security bill?
The RATs in the Senate will have enough votes to filibuster Shedd next year too. But I'd like to see them try.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.