Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ticking Sound May Be Your Pension Fund
MSN Money/CNBC/Reuters ^ | October 26, 2002 2:28:00 PM ET | Pierre Belec

Posted on 10/26/2002 7:44:21 PM PDT by arete

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Wall Street is waiting for the next shoe to drop. The next smackdown may come from the big hole the stock market's crash has punched in corporate pension funds.

Corporate underfunding, as it's called, is a ticking time bomb that will cast more doubt on the profitability of the nation's largest companies and the market's rebound.

``In the years ahead, earnings are likely to be depleted by pension liabilities,'' says John Hussman, publisher of Hussman Econometrics and professor of economics at the University of Michigan.

``Many companies continue to make assumptions about the probable return on stocks that has no relationship with the rate of return that stocks are actually priced to deliver,'' he says.

Investors should wise up to the implications of companies clinging to expectations the stock market will deliver double-digit gains because what's left of their battered 401(k) retirement money is at risk, Hussman says.

By one account, 50 of the biggest American companies have seen 90 percent of their pension surpluses go up in smoke during the bear market.

BAD NEWS BELOW INVESTORS' RADAR

The sad truth is the companies will have to sweep up much of their already pencil-thin earnings to cover pension shortfalls.

While some companies have begun to infuse billions of dollars into their depleted pension funds, more than a hundred names in the Standard & Poor's 500 index have still not acknowledged the problem.

Credit Suisse First Boston estimates that a whopping 325 of the 360 companies in the S&P 500 index that have defined pension funds will have shortfalls this year.

In a sign that not much has changed since the fairy-tale days of the 1990s, UBS Warburg, the Swiss banking giant, says 118 companies in the S&P 500 continue to report a pension surplus on their balance sheets, even through they're running a deficit after the stock market sank more than 20 percent this year. The last time the pension deficit issue dogged the nation's biggest companies was during the 1993 bear market.

The list of companies includes big-cap names such as International Business Machines Corp.(IBM), Ford Motor Co. (F) and Ingersoll-Rand Co.(IR)

GM'S BIG BET

General Motors Corp., the world's largest car maker, this month warned 2003 earnings could be cut by $1 billion or more due to the cost of funneling cash into its $67.3 billion pension fund. In the last nine months, GM's pension fund shrank by 3 percent. GM (GM) had assumed the money would grow by an unrealistic 10 percent, which exceeds the stock market's historic return of 6 percent a year.

Earlier this month, Standard & Poor's chopped GM's credit rating to just a couple of notches above junk status, saying the company's worldwide pension obligations may be underfunded by a staggering $28 billion by the end of the year. On Friday, S&P also cut Ford's long-term debt ratings to -- you guessed it -- just two notches above junk-bond status.

On Friday, the stock of Cigna Corp. (CI), the third-biggest U.S. health insurer, lost almost $3.5 billion in market value -- a day after the company cut its earnings estimates because of higher costs for health benefits and pension funds. On Thursday, Cigna said shareholder equity would be cut by up to $700 million in the fourth quarter from increased liabilities to fund pensions.

In the roaring bull market of the late 1990s, few people worried about corporate pension funds. But the pendulum has swung back the other way after the 2-1/2-year-old bear market. Companies struggling to make money in the tough economic environment must now divert billions of dollars to get their pension funds up to snuff.

There is no getting around the problem.

Unless the stock market stages a dramatic recovery, corporate pension funds will no longer contribute to their earnings through recapture. The shortfalls will have to be made up from their earnings.

So the longer the bears hang around, the greater the damage to pension funds. If one study is to be believed, stocks may underperform for years.

Stocks will be viewed as a ``high-risk, low-return investment,'' says Deutsche Bank, which estimates there's only a 23 percent chance that U.S. stocks will outperform bonds over the next 20 years.

The big issue facing investors is this: The risk of being in stocks has climbed and remains in the danger zone even after the market's bone-jarring drop.

``More pain is to be expected for equity investors and more riches for their bond counterparts,'' Deutsche Bank says.

Stocks may be pricing in more bad news. Since the start of the year, the market has had a series of ``wonder'' rallies, which have been built chiefly on companies ``beating'' expectations of analysts with incredibly poor forecasting records, as opposed to just plain good earnings.

MORE SWINGS THAN TARZAN

``There have been four false 19 percent rallies in the Standard & Poor's 500 index and eight in the Nasdaq during this bear market,'' says James Stack of InvesTech Research. ``All have ended with the market going to new lows. That's not characteristic of a new bull market.''

The fundamentals of Corporate America are still not sound. Poor earnings continue to be the source of Wall Street's malaise even after the recession supposedly ended.

Typically, investors focus on the future, eager to put money on the table in anticipation of a turnaround. The market turns six months before earnings start to improve. But so far the bears have still not left the building, which suggests the good times won't be rolling until at least the middle of next year.

The pension fund issue is creating a newer and perhaps a bigger problem for the stock market.

Many investors are staying on the sidelines, preferring to focus on the market's probable sub-par return. And they're ignoring the bizarre assumption of companies like GM, which are not operating in the real world, with expectations that their pension investments will grow by 10 percent.

On Friday, the three major U.S. stock indexes finished higher for the third straight week -- the longest such stretch of gains since August. For the week, the Dow Jones industrial average rose 1.5 percent to close at 8,444, while the S&P 500 also gained 1.5 percent, finishing at 898, based on the latest available figures. The Nasdaq composite index jumped 3.4 percent to end at 1,331.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: cash; economy; gold; investing; money; mutualfund; retirement; silver; stockmarket
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
bizarre assumption of companies like GM, which are not operating in the real world, with expectations that their pension investments will grow by 10 percent.

The pension fund issue seems to be the new hot media issue. Is it a warning?

Richard W.

1 posted on 10/26/2002 7:44:21 PM PDT by arete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sinkspur; bvw; Tauzero; kezekiel; ChadGore; Harley - Mississippi; Dukie; Matchett-PI; Ken H; ...
FYI

Comments and opinions welcome.

Richard W.

2 posted on 10/26/2002 7:46:09 PM PDT by arete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arete
Thanks for the post, interesting.
3 posted on 10/26/2002 7:48:57 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arete
A thumbnail with lots of fill-ins required. A company is required by law to fund their retirement system. It must be added to regularly to cover future retirees as well as continue to pay out current retirees. If a fund is invested and earning - on paper - equivalent to what should be added, a company can defer 'real' money and call that deferral a profit. Crunch comes when 'paper' profit disappears because now fund is underfunded in real dollars.

If companies were honest - dream on - they would put real money into the fund all along, without regard to investment dividends, and never had a problem. But, in the quest to look good, they fudge and now they pay - or pay it back that is.
4 posted on 10/26/2002 8:00:19 PM PDT by pacpam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arete
This seems like the 4th or 5th place I've read these warnings. So they are now being picked up by the mainstream press?
5 posted on 10/26/2002 8:08:45 PM PDT by DeaconBenjamin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PGalt
You are welcome. Lot of people aren't paying attention to what is going on and one day they are going to be in for a big surprise. Cash is king and gold is better.

Richard W.

6 posted on 10/26/2002 8:10:08 PM PDT by arete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
This seems like the 4th or 5th place I've read these warnings. So they are now being picked up by the mainstream press?

Kind of makes a person wonder what has sparked this sudden attention to the details by the press and air media, doesn't it?

Richard W.

7 posted on 10/26/2002 8:13:07 PM PDT by arete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: arete
Particularly as it is not entirely a new phenomenon. In the late 1970s I remember hearing about the Washington Post Board of Directors receiving bonuses reflecting the budgeted contribution to the Washington Post pension fund because Washington Post stock had performed so well, the expenditure was not deemed necessary. Evidently no consideration was given to the possibility that such paper gains might later be lost just as easily.
8 posted on 10/26/2002 8:52:03 PM PDT by DeaconBenjamin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: arete
"By one account, 50 of the biggest American companies have seen 90 percent of their pension surpluses go up in smoke during the bear market..."

It is worse that that. Very conservative projections.

More likely all companies are facing vastly worse projections ....

9 posted on 10/26/2002 9:05:24 PM PDT by ex-Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arete
So now we now your colors !

Green (Cash is king) and gold.
10 posted on 10/26/2002 9:26:53 PM PDT by imawit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: arete
Anybody check out the corporate bond market ?

Suppose GM & Ford made bond offerings in the 20% yield range ?

Would any one show up ?

This is one way of offsetting the cash need. Toss it into the future by a few decades. One added benefit is that bonds trump stock if you wound up having the wrong auto maker.

Cheez just think how many Cadilacs or Lincolns you might all of a sudden own.
11 posted on 10/26/2002 9:45:42 PM PDT by imawit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: arete
Bonds ?

Of course don't let this stop you, get some Diamler and Toyota and Ferrari and Rolls bonds too. Like they say, not all eggs in one basket.
12 posted on 10/26/2002 9:48:32 PM PDT by imawit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: arete
Stop complaining. The government will save us all.
13 posted on 10/27/2002 12:12:30 AM PDT by ChiefKujo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
One of the things I read awhile back was many of the biggest mutual funds lost BIIIIG time in one week. They owned several companies like TYCO, WCOM,AOL, and others that lost 20%, 30%, 50%, all in one week. Several trillion was gone at once, and it was the beginning of mutual fund withdrawals, so they were forced to sell to pay the people. Then they went into dirivitives to try and salvage their positions. I haven't heard anything since, but this was some Fiedelity and Vangaurd funds. I have heard that some funds will close but they gave no names. I hope people with these funds are keeping up with their prospectus'. They may be under water and can't pay if there is a run. Maybe with the recovery, there has been some shifting to better stocks. It's like Cigna was the other day. You can't loose $28 in one day on a core holding and make that up with your other stocks.
14 posted on 10/27/2002 1:03:49 AM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: chuckles
One of the things I read awhile back was many of the biggest mutual funds lost BIIIIG time in one week

Yes, back in July, many mutual funds took a big hit both to their portfolios and redemptions. Initially, a couple of novice spokesmen for some funds appeared on CNBC and expressed concern about the forced selling into a falling market. That lasted about two days and then the mutual fund industry slammed the information door shut, put the novices in a back office and sent out the old hypsters to say that everything was just fine and how now was a good time to buy, buy, buy.

Ever since then, there has been little reported on the health of the mutual fund industry although I did hear that as many as 500 funds have either been liquidated or merged into other funds this year. John Bogel of Vanguard fame commented that he thought that the number of funds would be cut in half. That cause quite a stir for a couple of days, and then that story was buried.

Don't expect much honesty and truth coming from the financial management business. They are losing investor money at a record clip and are charging management fees to do it. What can they say?

Richard W.

15 posted on 10/27/2002 5:51:09 AM PST by arete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: arete
"Cash is king and gold is better."

I also understand that other individual investors, whom some would consider them to be the 'smart money', have long been heavily weighted in natural resources (dircet investment and buying pure nat resource stock plays), in addition to the things you've mentioned.

16 posted on 10/27/2002 6:25:04 AM PST by Paulie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: arete
"Kind of makes a person wonder what has sparked this sudden attention to the details by the press and air media, doesn't it?"

perhaps it's because the members of the media are starting to feel a little cold wind blowing on the back of their own necks and thinking "...hmm, wonder what kind of shape MY pension fund is in?".....pension fund concerns take on a very personal dimension in a hurry....

Good luck to everybody!!

Stonewalls

17 posted on 10/27/2002 6:32:20 AM PST by STONEWALLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: arete
I was just explaining this issue and the difference between defined contribution and defined benefit pension plans to my wife at breakfast this morning. She was a good sport, but I got that look that says "boring husband alert". I said, you married an actuary, what do you expect?
18 posted on 10/27/2002 7:01:17 AM PST by Soren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arete
This from the James Joyce Table:

US core earnings 'inflated by 45%'

By Andrew Hill in New York

Published: October 24 2002 5:00 | Last Updated: October 24 2002 5:00

Pension and stock option accounting helped boost reported earnings at big US companies by about 45 per cent in the year to June, according to Standard & Poor's.

S&P will on Thursday publish its calculation of "core earnings" for the S&P500, the blue-chip index of the largest US companies. It deducts stock option costs from reported earnings, and excludes adjusted pension income.

According to S&P, core earnings for the four quarters to June 30 were $18.48 per share, compared with reported earnings of $26.74.

But the credit rating and financial information group cautioned that the divergence between core and reported earnings was particularly wide in the year to June, because of depressed markets and poor operating performance.

Even so, S&P's calculations are likely to fuel the growing debate about the reliability of corporate earnings.

"To me, the earnings numbers should reflect the way the world is, not the way we would wish it to be," says David Blitzer, S&P chief investment strategist.

S&P calculates that adjusted net pension income was worth $6.54 per share in the year to June and a further $5.21 would have been deducted if all S&P500 companies had treated stock option costs as expenses.

19 posted on 10/27/2002 2:04:58 PM PST by rohry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arete
The pension fund issue seems to be the new hot media issue. Is it a warning?

No, it's an election tactic. You're supposed to get all worried about your pension and vote Democrat. The Democratic politicians are having a Hell of a time getting anyone to pay attention to them, so the Democratic media is trying to fill in the gap. You won't be hearing any more about this after the election. It's just the media shilling for The Party.

20 posted on 10/27/2002 2:16:37 PM PST by Nick Danger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson