Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kodak fires man over 'gay' stance
WorldNetDaily ^ | Oct 24, 2002 | Joe Kovacs

Posted on 10/24/2002 9:24:46 AM PDT by Maximilian

Kodak fires man over 'gay' stance
23-year veteran of global film giant objected to pro-homosexual memo

By Joe Kovacs
© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com

A 23-year veteran of The Eastman Kodak Co. has been fired after objecting to a pro-homosexual memo this month and is now looking to take legal action against the film giant.

Rolf Szabo, who worked as a millwright at Kodak's world headquarters in Rochester, N.Y., was terminated for refusing to recant remarks officials say did not adhere to the company's "Winning & Inclusive Culture" designed to promote diversity among employees.

The events that led to the action began when Szabo was forwarded an e-mail from his supervisor regarding the Human Rights Campaign's annual "Coming Out Day." The memo reads:

Today, Oct. 11, is the Human Rights Campaign's 15th annual National Coming Out Day for people who are gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered. If one of your employees elects to "come out" at work, there are several things you can do to help that person feel comfortable in sharing his/her orientation in the workplace:

-- Be supportive of the individual who wishes to share this information.

-- Acknowledge his/her courage to publicly share this personal information.

-- Respect the individual's privacy. Understand how broadly he/she wishes the information to be shared.

-- Acknowledge your level of awareness of this topic, and share your personal willingness to understand.

What can supervisors do in the work environment to support their gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered employees who wish to be "out" to their supervisor or co-workers?

-- Be sensitive to the employee's language in defining their personal orientation.

-- Support the employee in displaying appropriate personal photos in the work setting.

-- Recognize and respect that not all (gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgendered) employees find it OK to be out at work. They should not be questioned or harassed about their sexual orientation.

-- Act quickly and responsibly if any anti-gay humor or negative comments are made in the workplace.

A footnote referencing the last two suggestions reads:

Keep in mind that such behaviors violate Kodak's Values as well as Kodak's Equal Opportunity Employment Policy, which all supervisors are responsible for maintaining in their areas. Specific examples are cited in your "Call to Action" training materials. Reported violations of this policy are to be thoroughly investigated. If verified, disciplinary action is to be taken.

The response by Szabo was brief, but it was dispatched to all recipients of the original e-mail, some 1,000 Kodak employees:

Please do not send this type of information to me anymore, as I find it disgusting and offensive. Thank you,

Rolf Szabo

Shortly after that comment, Szabo says another memo from manager Randy Bakel was sent to all of the workers, apologizing for Szabo's remarks:

As you all know, our strategic thrust to build a Winning & Inclusive Culture drives us to behave in ways that value everyone regardless of differences. While I understand that we are all free to have our own personal beliefs, when we come to the Kodak workplace, our behaviors must align with the Kodak Values. I apologize for the e-mail sent to all of you from Rolf Szabo this morning. Rolf's comments are hurtful to our employees, friends and family members who are gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgendered. This behavior is not aligned with the Kodak Values and, therefore, is not acceptable.

Szabo tells WorldNetDaily he was asked to sign an ECP – an employee commitment plan – saying he was sorry for what he had written and outlining steps to make sure a similar incident would not recur. When he asked what the alternative to signing it was, he was informed "termination."

"I would not submit and cave in to their trying to browbeat me into a confession," said Szabo, who is looking for legal advice before telling more details of his story.

Kodak, meanwhile, confirms the veracity of the e-mail memos, as well as subsequent action it took.

"The whole thing is true," said Jim Blamphin, Kodak's manager of corporate media relations. "This chap was asked to take part in a program that fosters inclusion, and he refused." But Blamphin also said there were additional reasons for the termination, which he would not specify.

"Every possible definition of diversity is embraced by Kodak," Blamphin said. "This is a company that does not take these matters lightly. Considerable thought is behind decisions that are made and policies that are established."

Indeed, the company makes no secret of its commitment to diversity. Its website provides a large amount of material expounding upon its mindset:

"All of us at Kodak work from a set of core values," says its mission statement, "and we're proud to say that our resulting personal conduct allows for an environment that is free from inappropriate pressures and diversions. We show respect for the dignity of the individual. And in the process, we value and champion our human differences. This helps us maintain the diversity of our workforce."

Kodak also touts a list of accolades received in recent years, with a consistent theme of equal opportunity and inclusion. Some of the honors refer to the sexual orientation of employees:

10 Best Places for Lesbians to Work (1999)
Kodak was given the above recognition by Girlfriends magazine, a national lesbian publication.

Diversity 100 (1999) br>Kodak was identified by Next Step magazine as taking the lead in addressing diversity, and was acknowledged for its commitment to building and managing a diverse workforce.

GFN.com 50 (1999)
The Gay Financial Network identified Kodak as No. 28 on the 1999 "GFN.com 50," its list of the 50 most powerful and gay-friendly publicly traded companies in the Fortune 500.

National Partnership for Reinventing Government – Diversity Best Practices (1999)
Kodak was one of 11 companies selected for Vice President Al Gore's National Partnership for the Reinventing Government benchmarking study on best practices: Achieving workforce diversity.

Top 25 Companies for Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgendered Employees (1999)
Kodak was recognized by The Advocate magazine as one of the 25 top companies that provide a good working atmosphere for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered employees.

Kodak CEO Dan Carp

And just this year, Kodak was one of 13 companies that earned a perfect rating of 100 percent in the Human Rights Campaign Foundation's first Corporate Equality Index. The index rates large corporations on policies affecting their "gay," lesbian, bisexual and transgender employees, investors and consumers. The others sharing top honors were Aetna, American Airlines, Apple Computers, Avaya, Intel, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Lucent Technologies, NCR, Nike, Replacements Ltd., Worldspan and Xerox.

"In the name of tolerance they foment a spirit of intolerance," says Rochester radio talk-show host Bob Lonsberry, who has been discussing Kodak's firing of Szabo on the air and in his online column. "Their ongoing incessant theme is diversity of the most progressive sort, but those in the workplace feel it's rubbed in their face."

Response to the issue on Lonsberry's message board has favored Szabo overwhelmingly.

"I work in the same division as Rolf," said one message poster. "Kodak is constantly trying to cram this diversity/inclusive culture crap down our throats. We are told by management that all beliefs are welcome. Well, as Rolf found out, if your opinions and fundamental beliefs go against the Kodak party line, you will be gone."

"What a crock," writes Paula from Rock Glen, N.Y. "You are now required at risk of your job to go along with things that to you are immoral. How nice. Now lets all holds hands and sing gay songs. If it is hurtful to the gay or lesbian person that not everyone likes what they do maybe it is their own ideas that what they are doing is wrong. And as for family of these people, I am one of those, and I do not get offended at any person being offended by what they are. They are immoral."

Lonsberry says this isn't the first time Kodak has gone overboard with political correctness. He points out the company had planned to mark the anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon by holding two all-day classes promoting inclusion as pointed out in this memo:

Diversity: Beyond Race & Gender focuses on helping employees to better understand diversity and inclusion as well as Kodak's commitment to creating an environment in which employees leverage diversity and inclusion to maximize the potential of everyone. Stephanie Street gives a lively presentation that provides employees the opportunity to think about diversity and inclusion in broader terms than just race and gender.

How Has 9-11 Changed Our View of Diversity & Inclusion? is an open forum in which employees are provided the opportunity to openly discuss where they were on 9-11, their reactions, and subsequent insights into diversity. This forum provides informal conversation with Brian O'Connor moderating the discussion to ensure that everyone who so desires has an opportunity to share.

"They turned Sept. 11 into a diversity field day," recounts Lonsberry, who points out backlash prompted the company to scrap plans for the classes and simply hold a moment of silence.

Headed by CEO Dan Carp, Kodak is among America's best-known companies, employing 54,800 people in the U.S. and 97,500 worldwide, with global sales of $13.2 billion.

Officials admit to getting some e-mails and calls about the termination, most of which are sympathetic toward Szabo. And while Kodak won't comment now on the potential of any lawsuit, it doesn't appear overly concerned about the possibility of a consumer boycott.

"Any situation that casts a cloud over any large corporation, the first thing people think of doing is stopping buying products," Blamphin said. "On any given day, there are over 1,000 boycotts against American products. ... You can't name any, I can't name any."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; gay; homosexualrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-154 next last
To: Maximilian
Here is the text of the message I left on the Kodak communication web site:

Hello

I want you to know that I am organizing a boycott of all Kodak products and services in my local community and I will also suggest to all of my friends and associates who hold Kodak stock to sell it as a response to your position that people who view a gay lifestyle as immoral and abhorrent are to be ignored and discarded.

I guess if we are to be ignored then you don't need our business either.

Please don't bother to respond to this communiqué as it will be received as too little and too late.

Only a complete removal of your so-called diversity program and a public apology to all of us who view homosexuality as wrong would suffice as a reason to drop my organized boycott.

Since you obviously deem the gay dollar as more valuable than the dollars of the rest of us then you shall have to get by without our business.

Watch the growth of Fuji market share, profits, and stock price.

81 posted on 10/24/2002 11:04:59 AM PDT by Conservative_Rob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: strider44
They'll stop reading as soon as they hit the word "Nazi". Good luck all the same though.

You're probably right, but they'll get the central idea of the message before they get there. I suppose the rest is wasted breath, but it makes me feel better

82 posted on 10/24/2002 11:05:28 AM PDT by Orbiting_Rosie's_Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: chachacha
No, they don't. But this guy didn't just send an email back to the source... he sent an e-mail to everyone who received the original email.

Regardless of who has what values, this guy wasn't very bright.

83 posted on 10/24/2002 11:06:44 AM PDT by MissMillie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Station 51
The "guy" at Kodak did nothing to demean or impune any gay person - he simply said that he was "offended" at the e-mail that was sent to him. I guess it's not OK to be "offended" if the "offence" is directed toward Christians.
84 posted on 10/24/2002 11:08:18 AM PDT by Conservative_Rob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Orbiting_Rosie's_Head
you may as well boycott just about every consumer products company in America. Pretty much all provide health insurance for domestic "partners", talk diversity out the ass, make their purchasing managers award certain percentages of business to minority owned companies...the list goes on and on...
85 posted on 10/24/2002 11:08:38 AM PDT by strider44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
The idea that Disney was tanking over a Baptist boycott is ludicrous. Disney has been having trouble at its parks because of a bad business model related to lack foot friendliness, cost of food and other expenses, length of stay, and philosophy where attractions aren't upgraded, but new ones are built. River Country has been closed for quite a while, and an entire resort has been completed for 2 years but still hasn't been opened because the crowds aren't supported. Meanwhile, they still can't handle moving even diminished crowds from place to place, and there are long end of night lines to get to monorails, buses and ferries.
86 posted on 10/24/2002 11:10:56 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
I'd like to see some diversity awareness on the behalf of EK. How about they show some tolerance for those of us who have traditional values? I wonder to what extent Mr. Szabo has a EEOC complaint (or whatever bureaucatic relief venue) to get compensated for EK's lack of tolerance...
87 posted on 10/24/2002 11:11:03 AM PDT by Made In The USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
You replied to an email... but did you send your reply to everyone that got the same email as you did? It's one thing to say to HR, "don't send this to me, I don't like it." Quite another to send an email to the whole company saying, "this stuff makes me sick."
88 posted on 10/24/2002 11:13:18 AM PDT by MissMillie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Damn typo - "lack of foot friendliness".
89 posted on 10/24/2002 11:13:37 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Conservative_Rob
I am not defending Kodak's policy, I am simply saying that they a right to make such a policy without the interference of government or other groups.
90 posted on 10/24/2002 11:15:16 AM PDT by Station 51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer
How appropriate that you chose a gay actor who played a hetrosexual lawer AKA Perry Mason. How disgusting.
91 posted on 10/24/2002 11:15:28 AM PDT by ItsTheMediaStupid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Go Gordon
What made you misunderstand me and think that I didn't understand?
92 posted on 10/24/2002 11:15:39 AM PDT by MissMillie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
"Every possible definition of diversity is embraced by Kodak," Blamphin said. "This is a company that does not take these matters lightly. Considerable thought is behind decisions that are made and policies that are established."

Does that mean they embrace NAMBLA and other pedophilles who advocate the rape of young children? How about sado-masochism, bestiality, necrophillia, urophilia, and coprophilia?

93 posted on 10/24/2002 11:17:44 AM PDT by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
"I have a better plan--how about we see what God has to say, and then follow that."

And of course, this entails using your version of what you believe God has to say... which, of course, cannot be proven.

Pass.

94 posted on 10/24/2002 11:18:00 AM PDT by MissMillie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: MissMillie
keep preaching that toleration bs
95 posted on 10/24/2002 11:19:58 AM PDT by MatthewViti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
A "Kodak moment" during a gay ole "coming out" party..


96 posted on 10/24/2002 11:20:09 AM PDT by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MatthewViti
where did I do that?
97 posted on 10/24/2002 11:23:03 AM PDT by MissMillie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: FormerLurker
... for the "times of your life" ...
98 posted on 10/24/2002 11:23:12 AM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
Thanks for the URL, here's my letter to Kodiak:
My comment is directed at the arrogant socialist position of Kodak management.
If you feel that consumers don't matter and consumer boycotts are irrelevant, I suggest you speak with Disney Inc. and China-Mart formerly known as Wal-Mart. As a consumer and avid photographer, I vote with my wallet.
Since Kodak has chosen to support un-American anti-family values, and to deride the religious values of Christians & Jews by encouraging abnormal behavior, I shall purchase my supplies elsewhere.
I shall also encourage family and friends especially those with children to buy their film products elsewhere in order to shield their young ones from a company that supports and encourages purveyors of abnormal sexual habits .
Good luck thumbing your corporate nose at real Americans. I hope your morally bankrupt corporate policies bring you the lack of success that you deserve.
99 posted on 10/24/2002 11:31:34 AM PDT by Marobe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
The idea that Disney was tanking over a Baptist boycott is ludicrous.

Offending your core market is rarely a good business strategy. Here is a link to a Baptist site describing the effects of the boycott.
Boycott May be Taking its Toll

At the time (1997) Disney was the star of the NYSE and Eisner was making over $500 Million per year. But check out this chart of Disney stock. It tanked in 1998, never participated much in the huge run-up of the "bubble" years, and now is down to where it was 10 years ago. Even the Nasdaq hasn't done that bad.
Disney 10-year Big Charts

100 posted on 10/24/2002 11:47:13 AM PDT by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-154 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson