Skip to comments.
Clinton aide slams Pentagon's UFO secrecy
CNN
| Tuesday, October 22, 2002 Posted: 2:05 PM EDT (1805 GMT)
| By Richard Stenger
Posted on 10/22/2002 11:19:36 AM PDT by RoughDobermann
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Buying Reynold's stock as we type...
To: RoughDobermann
Wait...wasn't one of Web Hubbel's first instructions from Clinton to learn if UFO's were real or not?
To: RoughDobermann
Yep! Definite 'hat material'...
To: RoughDobermann
Why didn't Podesta push this when Clinton was President. Oh, I forgot, he wasn't getting paid by the Sci-Fi channel to do it then.
To: RoughDobermann
OK, I see the Dem's latest strategy, after Enron/What-Did-Bush-Know-and-When-Did-He-Know-It failed...
"GEORGE BUSH IS COVERING UP THE TRUTH ABOUT UFO ALIENS!"
5
posted on
10/22/2002 11:26:01 AM PDT
by
Poohbah
To: RoughDobermann
I think the sick, SOB, sink emperor wants to 'do an alien' or 'git hisself serviced by an alien'.
Gross.
To: RoughDobermann
"eyewitnesses saw a fireball streak over North America, bank, turn and appear to crash in western Pennsylvania."You know there's a bad-a** Hillary Halloweeen joke in here somewhere!!!
To: freedomson
I think the sick, SOB, sink emperor wants to 'do an alien' or 'git hisself serviced by an alien'. He's just disappointed that he hasn't been picked up for one of those "anal probes".
8
posted on
10/22/2002 11:34:05 AM PDT
by
mlo
To: RoughDobermann
They do ask one intelligent question.
If it was just a meteorite, why is the information classified?
I don't know about UFO's, but I have always wondered about this aspect.
To: RoughDobermann
Podestama
TOON+Clin
TOON=Ma
ROONS......Mike
10
posted on
10/22/2002 11:38:41 AM PDT
by
MichaelP
To: sharktrager
I can see a reason why it would be classified.
The sensors involved in tracking the object are still in use in national defense today. Although they have been upgraded, a discerning enemy might use the information on what those sensors could do THEN and take into account the upgrades that have been made to determine what they can do NOW.
11
posted on
10/22/2002 11:41:11 AM PDT
by
Poohbah
To: Poohbah
That would explain some of the information being classified. They do, however, have the ability to selectively hide information.
The fact that they took a truck out there and picked the thing up is hardly the same as discussing the means by which they tracked the flight.
To: RoughDobermann
All they want to do is register them as Democrats, set up an affirmative action program if they are green, tax them and teach them to hate white people.
To: Poohbah
The sensors involved in tracking the object are still in use in national defense todayDing, ding, ding!! Winner ahoy! But, but, are you SURE that there is not a conspiracy...?
To: sharktrager
I have always wondered about this aspect I find it interesting too, but why now? He had eight years to request info of the Clinton administration. Unfortunately, with the media, just an association is seen as sticking to a subject, something Podesta knows very well.
15
posted on
10/22/2002 11:45:40 AM PDT
by
twigs
To: Brian Mosely
Hubbel's first instructions... you are kidding, aren't you?
16
posted on
10/22/2002 11:46:40 AM PDT
by
twigs
To: twigs
That's what ol Web claimed in his book...
17
posted on
10/22/2002 11:47:35 AM PDT
by
Poohbah
To: twigs
I find it interesting too, but why now? He had eight years to request info of the Clinton administration. Unfortunately, with the media, just an association is seen as sticking to a subject, something Podesta knows very well.I'd guess that the fact that there are $$$$ involved now, his motivation has changed somewhat.
To: sharktrager
OK, second possibility: this was a classified test that went awry. Ours or theirs--either way, it still may pertain to systems deployed now.
19
posted on
10/22/2002 11:48:39 AM PDT
by
Poohbah
To: Poohbah
Just speechless. Shouldn't be though. I knew these people were evil, but I didn't think of them as, um, well, as touched. What was his justification? And what is the name of his book? Is it worth reading?
20
posted on
10/22/2002 11:50:42 AM PDT
by
twigs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson