Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Inyokern
It appears to me to be Hebrew, not Aramaic. The reason I say that is that it appears to use the Hebrew "ben" (bet-nun) for son, rather than the Aramaic "bar" (bet-resh).

I had class with Dr. Fitzmyer today. He talked at some length about it. The inscription is Aramaic, not Hebrew, but there are some unusual characters. I'm looking forward to the article to read more. Personally, I have doubts about the statistics that predict only 20 James/Joseph/Jesus combinations. But we shall see.
73 posted on 10/22/2002 5:56:24 PM PDT by aBootes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: aBootes
The inscription is Aramaic, not Hebrew, but there are some unusual characters.

I would be curious on what he bases that statement. What "unusual characters?"

80 posted on 10/22/2002 6:40:26 PM PDT by Inyokern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson