Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DC Sniper: Real Americans Weigh In (attention Washington Area Residents)
Sierra Times ^ | 10-15-02 | J.J. Johnson

Posted on 10/15/2002 9:57:14 AM PDT by SLB

In our last article, we asked Real Americans to give us their take on the goings on in Sniperville. They did weigh in - in fine fashion. We'll take a consensus of what they addressed, followed by a few ideas that may help the folks in the Washington DC area deal with this menace. In case you're wondering who Real Americans are, let's put it this way: Real Americans were considered by many in government and major media to be the most dangerous threat to America when everyone went to bed on September 10, 2001. As of September 12, the Real Americans were no longer listening to that.

First and foremost, let's review something I stated in the last article:

"…The easy solution is to say that Americans should be armed and ready to rock at a moments notice. I suspect bulletproof vests may soon become 'en vogue' in the D.C. area and not a reason for suspicion…" This led to darn near everyone telling me that a regular vest won't stop a .223 bullet - as if I actually said it would.

Still, our sources in DC say that vests are flying off the shelves. But we won't tell anyone to stop buying them. They can stop many handgun rounds.

Much of the other information sent to us is a matter for law enforcement to handle. Our mission is to help the public. While writing this article, this author is watching live news coverage in Falls Church, Virginia about the latest shooting. We seem to have this down to a routine: There is a shooting, someone calls 911, the police arrive and confirm a shooting, and the whole area gets shut down while men in black stop and search every car. The shooter has more than enough time to blend into the flow of traffic long before the police lockdown can take place.

What's wrong with this picture?

Answer: Little or no citizen participation. The police are turning the metro area residents into prisoners of war the moment they arrive on the scene. Here's my suggestion:

Long before the new rave of the "Amber alert" system, every radio station was tapped into to something called the "Emergency Broadcast System" (EBS). This should be utilized for this operation. All metro area residents would be asked to have their radios playing while driving - any station will do. The moment a sniper incident happens and is confirmed, have someone with authority make an announcement via the EBS asking everyone listening to slow down and stop the vehicles in place - don't pull over, just stop the vehicles.

The strategy: We suspect our shooter is firing from pre-planned positions. Regardless, the escape routes are probably planned in advance as well. They expect to 'exfiltrate' into the flow of regular traffic.

The key word in that last paragraph is the word 'flow'. The strategy proposed here (all vehicles in a given area voluntarily stopped in the middle of the road) is to cut off the exit lanes of the shooter. A system like this set in place should cut the 'lag time' of waiting for police to arrive.

Just one of many ideas to toss around.

Next, the right to keep and bear arms. We know this is a foreign concept to many in that area, but we also hear reports of police finding more and more residents carrying firearms in their vehicles - for their own protection, of course. We understand there's no way some public official would give such practice a green light, but perhaps there could be an 'understanding', if you will, between local law enforcement and the citizen that such concealed carry prohibitions would not be enforced - at least for awhile. Washington residents reading this should talk to the local cop on the street about this.

NOTE: Those Real Americans that still insists this sniper situation is only to promote gun control should read the above paragraph again. Our sources in the area tell us folks are being found with weapons on them, but police have 'more important' things to do than arrest a bunch of law abiding citizens hell bent on protecting themselves and their loved ones.

And to those who are trying to capitalize on these shootings as a means to further their agenda, I say this:

"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed…"

Before you try to promote one more piece of gun legislation in Congress, consider how 'secure' the 'free states' of Southern Maryland and Northern Virginia are right now - with some of the toughest gun laws in the nation?

Enough said on that subject.

There were also many inquires from Real Americans on why more details about the shooters haven't been released to the public at this time. Fact is, Washington Area residents are beginning to realize all too well why this has NOT taken place. They know who's behind this, and I predict, after about another week of this, Washington Area residents will know what needs to be done to make it stop.

But that's not my call.

Washington, your shooter is working through the fabric of the social order. This sniper situation tells all of us that our enemy has studied us well. He is using our way of life as his camouflage, and his escape route. The shooter is succeeding because Washingtonians are behaving AS predicted, or as expected. So with that, I'll take a page from a book I wrote:

"…Sometimes you gotta be a little bit crazy to beat crazy people. Sane people don't do the unexpected…" - Cracking the Liberty Bell - 1997

If the above statement makes no sense to you, remember Flight 93, then read it again.

Yes, this is the kind of fight we are in. If we depend on police alone, we will lose. We are dealing with people who didn't exactly sign on to the Geneva Convention's Rules of War - so don't think we can profile this SOB into a 'terrorist box'. Our adversary expects us to hide on the ground and wait for the police to come save us. Now is long past the time when we can sit patiently and simply wait for government to rescue us. We have learned that this attitude only serves to give aid and comfort to the enemy. In this battle, we must be more than mere spectators. Someone, or something is waging war on our own soil. This makes us - all of us- soldiers by default. It's time we start acting like it. And the next time someone tells you to live your life as "normal", ignore them.

This is Real. This is War. And these are the Rules of Engagement.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: District of Columbia; US: Maryland; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS:
I searched for this and could not find it. As usual J.J. Johnson is right on target.
1 posted on 10/15/2002 9:57:14 AM PDT by SLB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SLB
Excellent article.
2 posted on 10/15/2002 10:06:46 AM PDT by JohnGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SLB
Agreed that JJ is on target. Now some additional fire for effect.

The kevlar vests that many police and some civilians wear to protect against most handgun rounds are not without use when facing .223 fire or for that matter .30-06 fire. These vests absorb considerable amounts of the bullets energy as it passes through. This may be enough to save one's life. It may provide the difference between being dead and being wounded. In short every little bit helps.

Stay well - stay safe - Stay armed - yorktown
3 posted on 10/15/2002 10:08:46 AM PDT by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
What good would a bullet proof vest do in this case? The Clymer prefers doing head shots.
4 posted on 10/15/2002 10:12:33 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SLB
A nice, calm, rational article. He leaves a lot unsaid, however. Would a concealed-carry pistol be much help against a man armed with a rifle more than a hundred yards away? Probably only if the sniper shot someone else and the citizen with the pistol happened to be near him or near his escape route. So far we don't know where the sniper is shooting from, but there have been no indications that any witnesses were close by at the times he (or they) fired.
5 posted on 10/15/2002 10:13:07 AM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SLB
DC FReeper here....I like the emergency broadcast and stop your car idea. We also started carrying a throw-away type camera with film advanced and ready to click in our car just in case we see something (God forbid) and could at least take some photos which might help.
6 posted on 10/15/2002 10:17:30 AM PDT by xeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SLB
Great post!
7 posted on 10/15/2002 10:19:33 AM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult
Actually there have been several chest shots. I am not certain of the number of head shots vs chest shots. I do know that the two who were wounded and the guy who was shot mowing his lawn were chest shots. Further if the scum doing the shooting misses then one has a better chance at survival.

Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown
8 posted on 10/15/2002 10:20:38 AM PDT by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Would a concealed-carry pistol be much help against a man armed with a rifle more than a hundred yards away?

Every civilized person should have a battle rifle in their car. Otherwise uncivilized people will rule our streets.

9 posted on 10/15/2002 10:24:15 AM PDT by AdamSelene235
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult
As you point out, vests aren't much protection against a head shot. The idea of stopping all cars in an area is a good one, except how would the cops get there to start their search.

What blows me away is how a white Astro with a ladder-rack can avoid being spotted with 2,000,000 people on the watch for it.
10 posted on 10/15/2002 10:25:48 AM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SLB
One suspects the law enforcement community and the print and electronic media want the suspect to be an "angry white male" of some sort, either a Timothy McVeigh-type white separatist, a Jeffrey Dahmer-type lunatic, or even a Ted Kaczynski-type radical leftist. That the suspect(s) might be members of al-Qaida, a similar group of Muslim terrorists, or even a free lance "angry Middle Eastern male" (or males) does not fit with either the government's position that everyone should be searched, with no profiling to be used (as at the airports) or with the media's position that Islam is a "religion of peace."

However, reality may well dissipate the fantasies of political correctness if the sniper(s) stumble or are captured by some local peace officer acting on the spot.

11 posted on 10/15/2002 10:33:19 AM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SLB
The following is from an email I just got from a good buddy:

...Charles Rangel is a dipshit. [not relevant, but...]

Latest sniper attack up here was about .5 mile from where we live. I go to that home depot all the time. Was across the street at Target last night (not at the time of the shooting though).

People up here are freaking.....zig-zagging when they walk on the side-walk (just a few people), getting in their cars when they pump-gas and laying down, etc etc.

12 posted on 10/15/2002 10:43:25 AM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SLB
For what it's worth, here's my idea for getting this character/s.

One of the area Malls, in collaberation with Law Enforcement, choose a strategicly advantageous Mall and advertise heavily that the publics safety will be ensured by several sniper teams guarding the Mall campus.

This would show just how proud the shooter is of his skills. Will he accept the challenge? Furthermore, LE snipers would provide a semi-permanent, trained observers in an area that is KNOWN to attract the shooter (in light of his proven record of reacting to media statements).

Because the presence of actual LE snipers are known (I think stationary nests most advantageous), and it's doubtful the shooter's skill equals their own, the risks to the sniper teams would be minimal.
13 posted on 10/15/2002 10:54:33 AM PDT by Woahhs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
"how a white astro van with a ladder rack can avoid being spotted"

I've been thinking about this. Its my hunch that the perps have a truck parked nearby. They shoot from the van, drive away to where the truck is parked, then pull the van up into the truck. That would completely throw off the police, who would still be looking for the white van.

14 posted on 10/15/2002 10:55:10 AM PDT by quebecois
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: quebecois
Quite possible. I find it hard to see why he'd keep using the same vehicle. You would think stealing a new car for each attack would make more sense.
15 posted on 10/15/2002 11:46:35 AM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: quebecois
I was wondering why people dont just start tailing white astro vans with ladder racks? Why the witnesses of the last shooting didn't run to their car, if they weren't already in it, and follow the "bad guys"? I just think it has to have something to do with the crazy idea that "the police are going to protect you" mentality that has been forced on everyone. Especially in such a liberal area. Think about it. Would this/these killer(s) be this successful in say Texas, or Kentucky? I highly doubt it. Someone would see them running away and either run over them with their truck or pop them with their 30-06. I just think that it is crazy "the people" have not done more to GET this guy, not just hide from him. Different mentality I quess.
16 posted on 10/15/2002 11:56:46 AM PDT by talkswowls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: talkswowls
Why not talk about this theory..???
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"The person/persons responsible for these shootings is NOT driving a white/cream Astrovan/truck...
He/they stake out a spot which is a public "coming & going" spot (eg. gas stations, parking lots, etc) where they know that people will come, stand out in view, and then leave...
He/they WAIT until a white van, etc. comes into view, THEN they shoot & take off...
Witnesses will focus on the van, especially NOW that everyone is looking for it, and he/they will ride off undetected"...
I found this pretty interesting at first, and even more so when watching the news last night and one of the reporters commented on
how "bold & brazen" the killer(s) would have to be to continue these horrific killings driving around in a vehicle that almost EVERYONE is looking for!!!
17 posted on 10/15/2002 12:10:24 PM PDT by freddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson