Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vatican Prepares Draft Directives Against Admitting Gays As Priests
Catholic News Service ^ | 10/9/02 | John Thavis

Posted on 10/09/2002 7:42:19 AM PDT by marshmallow

VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- The Vatican has prepared a draft document containing directives against the admission of homosexuals to the priesthood, informed Vatican sources said.

The document takes the position that since the church considers the homosexual orientation as "objectively disordered" such people should not be admitted to the seminary or ordained, the sources said Oct. 8.

The question of excluding homosexuals from the priesthood had been quietly considered at the Vatican for years without finding a consensus. It received new and more urgent attention in the wake of U.S. clerical sex abuse cases, many of which involved homosexual acts.

The Congregation for Catholic Education prepared the draft document in collaboration with the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and other Vatican agencies, the sources said. The draft was being circulated for comment in October among a wide range of consultants, including theologians, canon lawyers and other experts, they said.

At the same time, the education congregation has finished work on a separate document that examines how psychological sciences can be used in discerning vocations -- another hotly debated issue at the Vatican in recent years. Its publication was expected before the end of the year.

The document on psychological testing will take the form of guidelines or orientations for bishops to use in their seminaries, the sources said.

However, the draft document on homosexuals will take the form of directives or norms, to be used throughout the universal church, they said.

"The document's position (on admission of homosexuals to the priesthood) is negative, based in part on what the 'Catechism of the Catholic Church' says in its revised edition, that the homosexual orientation is 'objectively disordered,'" said one source.

"Therefore, independent of any judgment on the homosexual person, a person of this orientation should not be admitted to the seminary and, if it is discovered later, should not be ordained," he said.

Last year Archbishop Tarcisio Bertone, secretary of the Vatican's doctrinal congregation, said in a Catholic News Service interview, "Persons with a homosexual inclination should not be admitted to the seminary."

In September a U.S. Vatican official at the Congregation for Bishops, Father Andrew R. Baker, articulated arguments against acceptance of homosexuals as priesthood candidates in an article published by the Catholic magazine America.

Father Baker said that if a man has a predominant or exclusive same-sex attraction that in itself is grounds for bishops to have "a prudent doubt regarding the candidate's suitability" for receiving the sacrament of orders. Church law says if such a doubt exists the person should not be ordained.

Father Baker said homosexuality was a "disordered attraction" that can "never 'image' God and never contribute to the good of the person or society." He cited potential difficulties for homosexual seminarians or priests; they included problems dealing with their tendencies in a largely heterosexual society, questions about adherence to church teachings, and possible temptations presented in male environments like the seminary or the priesthood.

Father Baker said his article reflected his personal opinion and not the official position of the Vatican. While some Vatican officials have expressed similar views, others are concerned that such an attempt to "weed out" candidates to the priesthood would rely too heavily on interpretive evaluations of an individual's sexuality.

The officials who spoke to Catholic News Service said there was no definitive time frame for the document on homosexuality and admission to the priesthood.

"Only the Holy Spirit knows that," said one official.

Because of the sensitivity of the issues involved, Pope John Paul II and other top Vatican officials will be carefully reviewing it before publication, the sources said.

"There could be changes, especially because this is an interdicasterial (interdepartmental) work. There are some passages that must be written with very careful attention," said one official.

The wording in the catechism that describes the homosexual inclination as "objectively disordered" was added when the definitive Latin text of the catechism was released in 1997. Earlier editions of the catechism said homosexual acts were intrinsically disordered and said homosexual tendencies represented a trial for most people.

The document on psychological testing, titled "Orientations for the Use of Psychological Methods in the Admission and Formation of Candidates to the Priesthood," was discussed at the education congregation's plenary assembly in February.

At that time, the pope told the congregation's members that guidelines on the use of psychology to evaluate seminary candidates could help identify real vocations and ensure that such decisions are made with "a wider sense of awareness."

The pope said the support from psychological sciences should be used in a balanced way as part of the overall vocational path, integrated in a candidate's formation program. He said recourse to psychological methods can only be understood in the context of the "climate of faith" that marks the vocational decision.

Psychological methods "do not eliminate every type of difficulty and tension, but favor a wider sense of awareness and a freer exercise of liberty" when it comes to the challenging choice of a priestly vocation, he said.

Many Vatican officials have privately voiced apprehension about over-reliance on psychological methods to screen candidates to the priesthood. The document is said to address those concerns by stressing a balanced approach that recognizes the potential contributions of psychology, but within a limited sphere of competence.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/09/2002 7:42:20 AM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
No comment until the final version is released.
2 posted on 10/09/2002 7:48:50 AM PDT by Orual
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Nothing like closing the barn door after the horse has already escaped.
3 posted on 10/09/2002 7:51:22 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
............homosexual inclination as "objectively disordered"...........about bloody time.

...........Psychological methods...........Libs will have a field day protesting this form of 'profiling'.

4 posted on 10/09/2002 7:52:54 AM PDT by DoctorMichael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorMichael
Yup, can't lead churches whose teachings already did forbid such conduct while the rest of society thinks its just "dandy" that hollywood and Disney, who get a lot more attention from our kids than priests, are crawling with these objectively disordered individuals - to the point of celebration.
5 posted on 10/09/2002 8:06:18 AM PDT by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
It received new and more urgent attention in the wake of U.S. clerical sex abuse cases, many of which involved homosexual acts.

Correction: the vast majority of which involved homosexual acts (against teenage boys)

6 posted on 10/09/2002 8:23:48 AM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
A new document isn't needed. Just enforce the ban that was imposed in February of 1961.
7 posted on 10/09/2002 8:27:57 AM PDT by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
"The document's position (on admission of homosexuals to the priesthood) is negative, based in part on what the 'Catechism of the Catholic Church' says in its revised edition, that the homosexual orientation is 'objectively disordered,'" said one source.

Homosexuals, as the Catechism points out, are deserving (as is anyone) of the church's compassion and love. But homosexuality IS a serious disorder - it is not 'ordered' or 'normal' for men to desire to engage in sex with the rear ends of other men. The promiscuity of typical homosexual men is also highly disordered, and of course, the acts in which they engage have nothing to do with procreation. Such acts spread disease, create tensions among men (both heterosexual and homosexual), and raise disordered (and often filthy and disgusting) sexual acts to a high plane in the typical homosexual's life. Further, homosexual priests, even if chaste are subject to enormous temptations, as they live in the close company of other male priests, and are often put in charge of teenage boys - for whom they obviously have a (perverted) sexual attraction. It's high time to recognize that while we should love and have compassion for homosexuals, it's a really BAD idea to have people with a serious and sometimes dangerous sexual disorder as priests. Our sons and families have paid a huge price in ruined lives. Our lay people have paid a huge price in broken trust and suspicion. Let's have strong, virile (in the right way), normal men for priests.

8 posted on 10/09/2002 8:32:33 AM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Many Vatican officials have privately voiced apprehension about over-reliance on psychological methods to screen candidates to the priesthood.

It's quite obvious that such methods have been frequently used by liberals and apostates and sexual dissenters in the Church to disallow good men who only wish to teach true Christianity. That such has occurred is really horrific - and has contributed mightily to the spread of active homosexuality in the preisthood, and to the thousands of teenage boy molestations. Such methods are powerful tools which have been used evilly by evil people.

9 posted on 10/09/2002 8:35:08 AM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Father Baker said homosexuality was a "disordered attraction" that can "never 'image' God and never contribute to the good of the person or society." He cited potential difficulties for homosexual seminarians or priests; they included problems dealing with their tendencies in a largely heterosexual society, questions about adherence to church teachings, and possible temptations presented in male environments like the seminary or the priesthood.

This is diplo-speak, but it does hit some nails on the head. Basically, homosexuality, like premarital sex, drugs, etc. etc. is something from which no good, and often great evil comes.

10 posted on 10/09/2002 8:37:22 AM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: epluribus_2; SMEDLEYBUTLER; marshmallow; yendu bwam; All
I read an essay awhile back by Dennis Praeger (sp?; the conservative Jewish talk show host) who said that the Jews have different words for EVIL. All these words MEAN 'evil' but, in the original Hebrew used in the Old Testament, they denote gradations of 'evil'.

His point was the worst synonym for 'evil' in Biblical Hebrew is used in reference to homosexuality.

The wheels at the Vatican grind slowly, but at least they've begun to grind.

11 posted on 10/09/2002 8:39:19 AM PDT by DoctorMichael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
While some Vatican officials have expressed similar views, others are concerned that such an attempt to "weed out" candidates to the priesthood would rely too heavily on interpretive evaluations of an individual's sexuality.

OK. When a candidate for the priesthood goes to bed with a man, it's pretty clear that he's homosexual. When a candidate for the priesthood 'hits' on other men, it's pretty clear that he's a homosexual. When a candidate for the priesthood says that he sexually attracted to men, it's pretty clear that he's a homosexual. Yes, there is no clear way in some cases to tell, but where it is clear (in many, many cases), take action.

12 posted on 10/09/2002 8:41:05 AM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
This pope is a great man, but his one area of apparent failure has been his reluctance to enforce the rules. Another document will accomplish nothing unless the Vatican enforces it. Are they willing to fire bishops who continue to allow their seminaries to ordain gay priests while turning away normal candidates? I doubt it. Are these bishops going to change their ways because another document has been promulgated? I doubt it. Not when the know that the media would pound them mercilessly at the least hint of "homophobia."

The essence of the problem is the infidelity and weakness of many of the bishops, who permit open dissent and fear to provoke the secular media and the wrath of the politically correct.

Excommunication is not a popular word among Protestants, but it is what has been needed for some time. Public heretics like Frances Kissling, Charles Curran, and Fr. McBrien at Notre Dame need to be publicly excommunicated. And bishops who allow people like them to flourish publicly in their dioceses need, after due warning, to be removed from office and replaced by bishops who are loyal to the Magisterium and not afraid to follow Christ.

It's unlikely to happen. So whatever document they come up with will be consigned to the circular file just like Ex Corde Excclesiae.

Maybe Pope John Paul II knows that strict discipline would have provoked a revolt or schism, or some worse consequences than the tolerance that has been shown to dissent. It's not impossible, but it's hard to imagine. A whole generation of Catholic children have grown up deprived of the fullness of their faith, and that is the worst consequence of this inaction.
13 posted on 10/09/2002 8:43:00 AM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The Freeper Tagline Challenge!
For every dollar donated to FR in support of bringing back the Tag Line
I will match those donations up to a total of $500

Please let me know the amount you donate, thanks.

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

Fund Raiser thread here

14 posted on 10/09/2002 8:43:04 AM PDT by lodwick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Kudos to the Catholic Church. Like the Boy Scouts of America they are addressing the 'root cause' of the issue. This is the best news I've heard yet for the recovery of the church.
15 posted on 10/09/2002 8:53:04 AM PDT by johnb838
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
The essence of the problem is the infidelity and weakness of many of the bishops, who permit open dissent and fear to provoke the secular media and the wrath of the politically correct.

You bet. The Pope MUST enforce this, or face thousands more homosexual priest/teenage boy molestations in the future. Time to put kids first, sodomy last.

16 posted on 10/09/2002 9:00:32 AM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
A whole generation of Catholic children have grown up deprived of the fullness of their faith, and that is the worst consequence of this inaction.

You speak for me, Cicero.

17 posted on 10/09/2002 9:01:23 AM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson