Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Astronomers Discover Icy World Far Past Pluto
Scientific American ^ | 10/9/02 | Sarah Graham

Posted on 10/08/2002 11:32:13 PM PDT by Andy from Beaverton

October 09, 2002
Astronomers Discover Icy World Far Past Pluto

Quaoar
Image: NASA/ G. BACON

Astronomers have discovered the largest object in the solar system since Pluto was identified more than 70 years ago. The object, dubbed Quaoar (pronounced "kwa-whar") by its discoverers, is approximately half Pluto's size and nearly four billion miles away from Earth. Scientists announced its discovery on Monday at the meeting of the Division of Planetary Sciences of the American Astronomical Society.

Michael Brown and Chadwick Truillo of the California Institute of Technology first discovered Quaoar in June while they were surveying the Kuiper Belt, the field of comet-like bodies stretching seven billion miles beyond Neptune's orbit, using a 1.2-meter telescope. It appeared as a point of light creeping across the constellation Ophiuchus. The researchers then used the Hubble Space Telescope to measure the object's 1,300-kilometer diameter. The icy rock reflects just 10 percent of the light that hits it and moves around the sun in a circular path once every 288 years. Brown and Truillo chose the name Quaoar from creation mythology of the Native American Tongva tribe, early inhabitants of the Los Angeles area, but the object has not yet been officially christened. Until the International Astronomical Union (IAU) votes on the moniker, the body's designation is the somewhat less flashy 2002 LM60.

Discovering Quaoar, the scientists say, fuels hope that more large-scale bodies will be found in the Kuiper Belt--perhaps even some larger than Pluto. As it stands, several hundred so-called Kuiper Belt Objects (KBO) have been identified since 1992. According to Brown, Pluto is also a KBO. "Quaoar definitely hurts the case for Pluto being a planet," he says. "If Pluto were discovered today, no one would even consider calling it a planet because it's clearly a Kuiper Belt Object." --Sarah Graham



TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 10/08/2002 11:32:13 PM PDT by Andy from Beaverton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Andy from Beaverton
Thoughts about the nomenclature include "Hillary's Thighs 00001", named for the only metalic brained child of a nebulous scurrier and the asteroid that collided...
2 posted on 10/08/2002 11:35:30 PM PDT by Vidalia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; Quila; Rudder; donh; VadeRetro; RadioAstronomer; Travis McGee; Physicist; ...
((((((growl)))))



3 posted on 10/08/2002 11:37:50 PM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andy from Beaverton
It should be noted that the image in the article is certainly not that of the newly-discovered body - the best maps of Pluto to date are a series of multicolored smudges, and unless optical telescope technology has made a quantum leap forward in the last few months that I hadn't heard about, the notion of getting such a detailed photo of a 0.10 albedo object a billion miles beyond Pluto's orbit is far-fetched, to say the least.
4 posted on 10/09/2002 12:06:04 AM PDT by mvpel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andy from Beaverton
Any sign of Bin Laden?
5 posted on 10/09/2002 12:07:43 AM PDT by Logic_3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: mvpel
Good catch. The article in today's "L.A. Times" captioned the 'photo' as an 'artists concept.'
7 posted on 10/09/2002 12:10:55 AM PDT by Looking for Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dan Rick
Yes, the Pluto smudge maps are primarily from Hubble. By making deductions based on brightness changes when Charon passed in front of Pluto several times during the 1980's, an estimate of the brightness of various parts of Pluto's surface was calculated. Check out the JPL Pluto page and the Pluto Solar System Exploration page for more details.
8 posted on 10/09/2002 12:23:48 AM PDT by mvpel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
Correct! Hubble can't image Pluto or its moons that well, much less something 1,300 miles across which is 7 or 8 billion miles further out.
9 posted on 10/09/2002 12:27:30 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
BTW, just for fun, here's a gee-whiz artist's rendering of the Kuiper Belt and the much larger Oort Cloud. The Oort Cloud has an estimated radius of approximately 3 light years . . . Which means "our" Oort Cloud probably overlaps with the "Oort Clouds" of several of our nearby stellar neighbors.


10 posted on 10/09/2002 12:50:44 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Andy from Beaverton; All
Previous thread on this topic (title has no words in common with the title of this new thread):
If this is not 'Planet X', what is it? (biggest solar system body found in more than 70 years).
11 posted on 10/09/2002 3:34:42 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andy from Beaverton
Discover Icy World".....

Hillary's pantsuit! The new Planet should be called "Old Crusty".

12 posted on 10/09/2002 4:49:28 AM PDT by ChasingFletch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
I've got it! We need a giant strobe mounted on top of the Hubble! OK, now say cheese!
13 posted on 10/09/2002 5:22:26 AM PDT by M. T. Cicero II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Is this Planet X, that will destroy earth in? Well I don't remember when Art Bell said that was gonna happen. I shoulda been paying more attention, but I was bummed that the aliens don't talk to me.
14 posted on 10/09/2002 5:25:44 AM PDT by M. T. Cicero II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Andy from Beaverton
. . .several hundred so-called Kuiper Belt Objects (KBO) have been identified since 1992. . .

Have their Properties, Methods and Events been identified?

15 posted on 10/09/2002 5:32:49 AM PDT by William Terrell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth; Andy from Beaverton
Interesting. Thanks for the post and the ping......


16 posted on 10/09/2002 6:20:06 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: M. T. Cicero II
Is this Planet X, that will destroy earth in?

Um... yeah. Just as soon as Earth drifts too far past Pluto's orbit...

17 posted on 10/09/2002 7:24:09 AM PDT by john in missouri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell
Not yet. But 4 billion miles from Earth is definitely encapsulation.
18 posted on 10/09/2002 7:25:47 AM PDT by john in missouri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Andy from Beaverton
It might surprise some journalists to find out that there are more things outside the orbit of Pluto than inside.
19 posted on 10/09/2002 7:38:02 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
An icy body not of this Earth? Sounds like Hillary.
20 posted on 10/09/2002 8:05:40 AM PDT by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson