To: buffyt
Your friend may not disagree with Oakley. Bill Clinton was a horrible sleaze and a disgraceful excuse for a human being, but he was far luckier than he had any right to be. The Internet bubble helped him, and he left before it broke. He may have cooked the books on labor statistics. Someone should investigate it. And the prosperity of the very late nineties casts a halo back over the troubled and uncertain early years of his administration. But if what your friend is saying is that Clinton was a very lucky b*st*rd, who can disagree with that?
5 posted on
10/04/2002 10:29:37 AM PDT by
x
To: x
"Bill Clinton was a horrible sleaze and a disgraceful excuse for a human being, but he was far luckier than he had any right to be."
Luck had nothing to do with it. Clinton merely covered up the terrorist attacks that occured and invented a financial boom based upon hot air.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson