Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scud Hunting with Delta Force and the SAS
specialoperations.com ^ | 1997 | Thomas B. Hunter

Posted on 09/25/2002 8:41:01 PM PDT by VaBthang4

Scud Hunting with Delta Force and the Special Air Service (SAS)

By Thomas B. Hunter

During the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988), Saddam Hussein launched approximately 350 ballistic missiles against Iran. These attacks included a large number of R-17 single-stage missiles from a stockpile of 650 purchased from the Soviet Union. The R-17, as originally designed, had a maximum range of 300 km and was capable of carrying either a 2,000 lb. conventional or 100 kiloton nuclear warhead. In time, however, Iraqi engineers were ordered to develop a weapon capable of striking deeper into Iranian territory. To this end, designers made use of cannibalized parts from other R-17s to create three longer range hybrids unique to the Iraqi military: a long-range Scud (unnamed), the al-Hussein (600-650 km) and the al-Abbas (750-900 km). Most alterations were made via a reduction in warhead weight and a corresponding increase in fuel load. Saddam also managed to acquire 36 mobile launch vehicles based on the MAZ543 (8x8) wheeled chassis, originally developed in 1965 for the Soviet Army. The TELs as designed had a road range of 550 km, a top road speed of 70 km/hr, and vehicle cab air filtration for use in an NBC environment. Of these, only the Al-Abbas could not be fired from a mobile launcher. However, these successive Iraqi modifications, while providing greater range, dramatically reduced both the structural integrity of the missile and its notoriously poor accuracy (1 km CEP).

Despite these major drawbacks, it did serve one purpose particularly well: when fired in any number against densely populated urban areas, the Scud was an effective terror weapon. This secondary use was not lost on Hussein. On 18 January, seven Scuds struck Haifa and Tel Aviv, destroying 1,587 apartments and causing nearly fifty civilian casualties. Similar attacks followed in the next few days. These terror attacks caused the desired response. Israel immediately sortied aircraft ready to strike Iraqi targets. Later, they launched a nuclear-capable missile into the Mediterranean Sea to clearly demonstrate to Iraq one of the possible responses to further Scud attacks. Only quick intervention by senior U.S. politicians and the immediate dispatch of Patriot missile batteries to Tel Aviv averted a catastrophe. Hussein's intent was clear: to divide the Coalition by prompting Israel to attack and thus become an active participant in the war. There seemed little doubt that at the very least, this action would cause Syria, Egypt and others to abandon the Coalition. At worst, Arab nations might side with Iraq and prompt an all-out Middle East war. For this reason, destruction of Scuds became the overwhelming priority for Allied war planners.

The primary focus of counterforce planning at the hme with regard to the Iraqi Scud threat revolved around the location and destruction of fixed launch sites. By August 1990, the Department of Defense had located five such sites with 28 launchers. TR-1 / U-2R reconnaissance, E-8 JSTARS radar ground surveillance aircraft, and DSP early-warning satellite imagery quickly located fixed sites, however these tools proved insufficient in monitoring the transient mobile Scud launchers. Thus, the decision was made to send special operations forces to hunt the Scuds on the ground. The U.S. Army's Special Forces Operational Detachment-Delta (SFOD-D), better known as Delta Force, and the British Special Air Service (SAS) were selected to perform what would become one of the largest counterterrorist operations in history.

The senior British officer in the Gulf, Lieutenant General Sir Peter de la Billiere, was the first to convince U.S. General Norman Schwarzkopf, a skeptic of the use of special operations forces, that SAS teams could be inserted behind enemy lines to conduct effective harassment and sabotage missions against the enemy. To the surprise of some, this suggestion was approved and two 'Sabre' squadrons (one half of the Regiment's fighting manpower) were deployed and began operations on 20 January 1991. On 24 January, however, the mission was changed to focus on Scud-hunting in western Iraq. The British teams were assigned a vast expanse near the H-2 airfield, from south of Highway 10 to the Saudi Arabian border. known as "Scud Alley".

One squadron from Delta arrived in Saudi Arabia by early February 1991 as part of the Joint Special Operations Task Force (JSOTF). Following a period of concentrated planning, teams infiltrated western Iraq by a variety of methods, often working with the pilots and crews of MH-60 Black Hawks and MH-47E Chinooks from the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment (SOAR) based in Ft. Campbell, Kentucky. (Heavily armed aircraft from this unit also conducted independent direct action missions against Iraqi radar sites, convoys, and other targets.) The U.S. element was assigned as its hunting ground the area northwest of Highway 10 near Al Qaim, known as "Scud Boulevard".

The primary mission for both SAS and Delta was to locate and designate targets for destruction by Coalition warplanes. To this end, most teams traveled at night, while hiding out during the day. In periods of darkness or for targets obscured by camouflage, the roving teams carried laser target designators (LTD). Using these, an attacking aircraft could employ laser-guided bombs or missiles riding the beam emitted by the LTD. Those targets that were caught out in the open during daylight hours were targeted visually by the operators on the ground who then directed in aircraft armed with unguided bombs and other munitions. The hunters were able to provide information on enemy vehicle movements, however by the time this intelligence was incorporated into the target package oftentimes the mobile launchers had left their hiding place and moved to another location.

In addition to their targeting duties, Delta undertook other direct action missions against the Scuds. These included using long-range, .50-caliber sniper rifles to disable and destroy missiles both in rearming farms and those mounted on their TELs. Other interdictions reportedly involved eliminating Scud crews as well as the use of AT4 anti-tank missiles on larger targets. One of the more interesting elements of the operation was the group based at the outpostof Al Jouf, approximately 150 miles south ofthe Iraqi border. This was a truly 'joint' team made up of SAS personnel, along with USAF A-10 Thunderbolt aircraft and AFSOC MH-53J Pave Lows. These British teams soon developed a close relationship with the USAF crews as the Pave Lows provided insertion and the 'Warthogs' were often the first aircraft to respond to reports of TEL sightings. It should be mentioned that other SAS units were also transported in their own version of the Chinook, flown by its own helicopter squadron (based in Hereford) or Royal Air Force (RAF) crews. One 30-man SAS team, reportedly deployed from Al Jouf, successfully assaulted a Scud command-and-control center, despite the presence of an estimated 300 Iraqi military personnel.

Delta and SAS adapted to the harsh terrain by making effective use of light vehicles during their operations instead of patrolling on foot. Delta operated the Fast Attack Vehicle (FAV) while the SAS drove two versions, the Longline Light Strike Vehicle (LSV) and an updated version of the long-lived "Pink Panther" Land Rover. Both vehicles were designed to carry heavy loads, including two or three fully-equipped soldiers, food, water, ammunition, extra fuel and a wide variety of weapons (up to six Milan or TOW anti-tank missiles, and a mount for a 40mm grenade launcher, 30mm cannon or .50 caliber heavy machine gun). One persistent but unverified report from the Gulf War recounted that a single LSV carried 12 SAS troopers and their gear during one such operation.

It was not long, however, before a major shortcoming in the Scud hunt operations became apparent. Upon sighting a viable target, the troopers had to communicate the intelligence over the emergency "guard" frequency. Response times averaged an unacceptably high sixty (60) minutes, during which some targets were able to escape unharmed. The C3I system that had proven so effective for the advance planning of conventional airstrikes proved insufficient for incorporating real-time intelligence being sent back by the troopers. In order to facilitate communications between the ground teams and Coalition air power, the SAS requested and was approved the posting of liaison officers to the Tactical Air Control Center (TACC) in Riyadh. As a result, improvements were made which permitted more direct communication. This was further enhanced by the practice of keeping ground attack aircraft constantly in the air, ready to respond immediately when a suitable target was located. Coalition aircraft were also warned of the presence of special forces operating in western Iraq, in an effort to prevent any "friendly fire" casualties.

These missions were not without loss to the hunters. At approximately 0300 on 21 February, four pilots and crew from the 160th SOAR and three Delta operators were killed when an MH60 helicopter crashed into a sand dune during zero-visibility weather conditions near the Ar Ar airfield. The ground team was reportedly conducting counterforce operations when one of the team was injured in a fall from a cliff and required medevac, to which the 160th responded. Similarly, one eight-man SAS team was compromised while on a reconnaissance mission. Four of these troopers died during escape-and-evasion after they were engaged by subsequent Iraqi patrols. Commandos from both groups were injured in firefights with Iraqi forces on a number of occasions in addition to casualties from exposure to unexpectedly cold nighttime weather.

The effect of the overall ground-based 'Scud Hunt' from a military perspective is skill a matter of speculation. There is no question that Coalition aircraft attacked a number of decoys and other targets that only after-action analysis revealed were not Scud-carrying TELs. One graphic incident occurred at a press briefing during the war in which General Schwarzkopf claimed video footage being displayed showed Scud launchers being destroyed when in fact later analysis indicates it was instead a group of fuel tanker trucks. At the end of the war UNSCOM found 62 complete al-Hussein missiles, six MAZ-543 TELs and four other TELs, along with parts of 88 other missiles and nine TELs. The Iraqis were also suspected of hiding other missiles from the UN inspection teams. 14 of 28 fixed sites were also destroyed. From a political perspective, however, the hunt was an unqualified success and may have provided one of the single greatest, and least known, contributions to the victory of Coalition forces in the Gulf.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Free Republic; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: North Carolina; US: Virginia; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: british; delta; iraq; israel; sas; scud; specialforces
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 09/25/2002 8:41:02 PM PDT by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MP5SD; rintense; deport; Mo1; TLBSHOW; MindBender26; spetznaz; Gunrunner2; MadIvan; Poohbah; ...

2 posted on 09/25/2002 8:43:04 PM PDT by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
General Horner tells the tale of an SAS officer giving the scoop to an F-15E Strike Eagle. The SAS officer had a Scud spotted, and thought that was the target the F-15E driver was targeting. Turns out the zoomie was targeting ANOTHER Scud vehicle less than 300 meters away from the SAS officer that the SAS guy never saw (because it was at the base of the cliff he was standing on).

"Ah, roger, Yank, we hear your engines and--"

(Bomb hits Scud launcher at based of cliff, enormous fireball goes up cliff.)

"JAY-SUS CHRIST!"

Box score: one Scud launcher blown to hell. One SAS officer singed by the fireball (and probably in need of changing his underwear). One Scud launcher takes the hint and di-di-maus the heck outta Dodge.

3 posted on 09/25/2002 8:56:33 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz; Gunrunner2; MP5SD; Vidalia; LibWhacker; nopardons; rdb3; Quix; wretchard; ...
Starting my Military Ping List...

4 posted on 09/25/2002 8:59:53 PM PDT by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Dangerous work. Simple mistakes can cost you your life....but'cha gotta stay loose.
5 posted on 09/25/2002 9:01:47 PM PDT by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
These missions were not without loss to the hunters. At approximately 0300 on 21 February, four pilots and crew from the 160th SOAR and three Delta operators were killed when an MH60 helicopter crashed into a sand dune during zero-visibility weather conditions near the Ar Ar airfield. The ground team was reportedly conducting counterforce operations when one of the team was injured in a fall from a cliff and required medevac, to which the 160th responded. Similarly, one eight-man SAS team was compromised while on a reconnaissance mission. Four of these troopers died during escape-and-evasion after they were engaged by subsequent Iraqi patrols. Commandos from both groups were injured in firefights with Iraqi forces on a number of occasions in addition to casualties from exposure to unexpectedly cold nighttime weather.



the above is what seems to be described in Andy McNab's "Bravo Two Zero".
6 posted on 09/25/2002 9:39:45 PM PDT by marginovera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marginovera
Bravo Two Zero
by Andy McNab


Look inside this book

7 posted on 09/25/2002 9:45:16 PM PDT by marginovera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
Regrettably, the most telling point of this piece is that by omission, it confirms that we never got a single scud on the ground.

So much for our sensors, intel gathering, and USAF that thinks it can win any war by itself.
8 posted on 09/25/2002 9:46:03 PM PDT by DK Zimmerman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
WOW .. thanks for the ping
9 posted on 09/25/2002 9:46:20 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: VaBthang4
Thanks for the Ping! Great piece of history.

"Later, they launched a nuclear-capable missile into the Mediterranean Sea to clearly demonstrate to Iraq one of the possible responses to further Scud attacks."

Hope Saddam's memory doesn't fail him.

11 posted on 09/25/2002 10:01:30 PM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
Nothin' like a little snoopin' 'n poopin' to increase the pucker-factor and make for a real fun time!!
12 posted on 09/25/2002 10:02:04 PM PDT by CIBvet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
If you wanna be on [or God forbid, off] my military ping list...FRe-mail me.


13 posted on 09/25/2002 10:13:59 PM PDT by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DK Zimmerman; VaBthang4
Regrettably, the most telling point of this piece is that by omission, it confirms that we never got a single scud on the ground. So much for our sensors, intel gathering, and USAF that thinks it can win any war by itself. - DK Zimmerman

From the article: One 30-man SAS team, reportedly deployed from Al Jouf, successfully assaulted a Scud command-and-control center, despite the presence of an estimated 300 Iraqi military personnel.

Also from the article: In addition to their targeting duties, Delta undertook other direct action missions against the Scuds. These included using long-range, .50-caliber sniper rifles to disable and destroy missiles both in rearming farms and those mounted on their TELs. Other interdictions reportedly involved eliminating Scud crews as well as the use of AT4 anti-tank missiles on larger targets

I would say the Special Forces teams did a lot of mayhem against the Iraqis, and they did get several Scuds before they were launched. I have not gotten sufficient info on the efforts of the Deltas in the conflict (although the article clearly shows they did a lot of stuff against the Iraqis) however i have read reports of what the SAS was doing behind the scenes and i can tell you it is not only amazing it is almost superhuman!

14 posted on 09/25/2002 11:05:34 PM PDT by spetznaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
Thanx for including me on your ping list. Amazing graphics by the way.

Also have you included Psyop and Marine Inspector?

15 posted on 09/25/2002 11:08:19 PM PDT by spetznaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DK Zimmerman
"So much for our sensors, intel gathering, and USAF that thinks it can win any war by itself. "Now we have:

Unmanned aircraft that can launch missles
Satellites that can see through clouds
Lazerd and GPS guided bombs aplenty
Spec Ops that can move inside Iraq locating the convoys moving the missle/trucks

16 posted on 09/25/2002 11:27:35 PM PDT by Crossbow Eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DK Zimmerman; VaBthang4
DK Zimmerman says:   "So much for our sensors, intel gathering, and USAF that thinks it can win any war by itself."

Ever the techy, I figure that just means we don't have enough sensor capability. All the Iraqi scuds (and several other of their missiles) were liquid fueled missiles that used red fuming nitric acid as the oxidizer. This stuff is always out gassing and the fumes should be detectable from quite a distance by viewing in the appropriate optical spectrum or using semiconductor NOx fume detectors. Follow the NOx plume back to its source and that's a gotcha. As long as we weren't tracking camel farts, this might work. Equipping a UAV with this technology could go a long way to locating scuds.

Regards,

Boot Hill

17 posted on 09/26/2002 3:32:49 AM PDT by Boot Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Squantos; Travis McGee
FYI
18 posted on 09/26/2002 5:02:56 AM PDT by SLB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
I saw a TV show a few years back that stated that not one single scud was shot down by our Patriot missles. The show said that the display of the Patriots exploding in mid air was just a ruse to demoralize the enemy and to pacify the Israelies. The show went on to say that virtually all of the scuds were destroyed by SAS and Special Forces on the ground. Is there any truth to this?
19 posted on 09/26/2002 5:20:50 AM PDT by taxed2death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gulf/weapons/patriot.html
20 posted on 09/26/2002 7:28:28 AM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson