Replies

Any issue of a paper product with this crap,

" Media headlines focused mostly on the military aspects of the new Bush policy. "Bush to Outline Doctrine of Striking Foes First," read The New York Times, which printed a leaked copy on Friday morning. Later in the day, Reuters headlined, "Bush Outlines Strategy of Preemptive Strikes." CNN described it, simply, as "First Strike Doctrine." Needless to say, many Americans will support the Bush strategy of anti-terror pre-emption, first outlined in a June 1 presidential speech at West Point, which has now been elaborated and turned into a formal politico-military doctrine.

will promptly be put in the "bird cage" pile where it belongs.

You will notice the whiners and bitchers are the same ones who defend any criminal act, blaming it on "environmental" or social psycho-drooling meant as any excuse for anything.

The soap eaters might pay attention that the mentality of the country is becoming more and more positive the closer we get to culling the crap out of the Middle East, thereby making our streets and airways a bit more safe in the long run.

This vomitus sniping might as well be re-inhaled and redigested, for it goes nowhere else.

For those who continue to spew their own personal bile disguised as "educated expertise", good luck on your next physical examination, for you will find that the carbolic acidity is not only eating away your stomach lining, it is also contributing to your watery secondary, tertiary and quaternary bowel movements that consist of your own elitist vowels and consonants strewn together into tortured and cramped descriptions of, of, of, well, your own bowel movements and mental failures in respect to logical thought or the "big picture" of world security.

Your myopic vision of the world is based upon the view that your avail yourself from the colon through your Rectal Eye, as opposed to the "minds eye" you believe you have.

Your attitude of "Screw the country but don't hurt little ol' super intelligent me" crap is now worn thin.

Over 3,000 dead innocent Americans and you continue to whine? Good luck, for Buzz Aldrin may have started something you might not appreciate...

I'm not sure why you say this article is "vomitous" or that Pinkerton is defending criminal acts based on environmental or social conditions. Pinkerton is a conservative writer who served under the Reagan and Bush I adminstrations and contributes to Fox News. I'm also baffled as to why the quote you posted is "crap". It simply says that the media have focused mostly on the military aspect of the first strike policy and that the people support it. How is this "crap"? Pinkerton's main argument is that the war on terrorism will eventually be used to justify government growth because of the inherent bureaucratic nature of government. Every bureaucracy will want to expand their programs under the banner of the War, even though it may not have anything to do with terrorism. What do you disagree with about this point?

A few comments/questions to you, in the hopes you might again characterize my ideas in terms of my excrement. It was quite poetic.

Sounds like you're a typical "conservative" and as such you ostensibly oppose a collectivism known as socialism. I find it peculiar that you espouse a related type of collectivism, nationalism, to combat socialism. Socialists speak for "society" and play divide and conquer class warfare games, and you speak for "America" and play divide and conquer nations-at-war games. Those that fail to see the world your way just don't get "the big picture", or can't make sacrifices "in the national interest".

Your attitude of "Screw the country but don't hurt little ol' super intelligent me" crap is now worn thin

Is this to say that an individual looking out for his/her own interests necessarily "screws the country"?

If we "stand up for the country" and obliterate Al Qaeda, is the war for freedom won? All sarcasm aside, now that......:

The BATF can intimidate law-abiding gun owners and burn them alive when they defend themselves against illegal raids

The Feds can come along and take your property if they want (without any compensation given to the owner) by claiming to have seen a few marijuana plants from a helicopter, or by inventing a new endangered species and claiming that your land is its habitat

The IRS knowingly defrauds American citizens by convincing them they are liable for an income tax which was never imposed on them

You're kicked off a jury or otherwise threatened with contempt of court for failing to vote only as the law says, instead of voting your conscience

Personal firearms ownership and citizen militias are villified and militia leaders are imprisoned on phony conspiracy charges (and a large, much better armed standing army is accepted as the bulwark of the nation's defense, in direct contrast to what the founders had in mind)

The state declares war on homeschoolers by seeking to require licensing, and forces all citizens to fund youth propoganda camps (otherwise known as government schools, the reproductive engine of the welfare state) whether or not they use this "service"

.....when is "the country" no longer "the country" that our fathers/grandfathers hit the beaches at Normandy to defend? What must happen here for you to ponder if the critical front in the war for freedom is in the Middle East or in the US?