THE DEMOCRAT PARTY IS BEYOND CORRUPT, IT'S ALSO EVIL WARNS JIM ROBINSON IN SCATHING ATTACK OF TRUTH

freerepublic ^ | 9/21/2002 | Jim Robinson

[TLBSHOW]

The Democrat Party is beyond corrupt, It's also evil.

And what is this evil that triumphs when good men do nothing? What are we really talking about here and is it worth fighting for? Is it worth turning our heads and allowing evil to continue on while we do nothing? (and I count voting for a third party candidate when knowing that he has absolutely no chance of defeating the Democrat, and worse, actually planning and hoping to knock out the Republican candidate who otherwise might have defeated the Democrat, as doing nothing).

Corruption is accepting campaign cash from the Chinese in exchange for military hardware. Corruption is accepting campaign cash as bribes from Indonesian power brokers, from Buddhist Monks, from corrupt corporate moguls. Corruption is defined by the myriad criminal acts and practices of the Clintons and the Gores and their corrupt Democrat minions.

Corruption is the land grabs, the power grabs, the gun grabs, the bribery, the shady deals, the high crimes and treason. Corruption is the theft of campaign dollars through forced labor union deductions. Corruption is the systematic indoctrination of several generations of our youth with socialist dogma via government school systems. Corruption is the removal of God from public life and substituting in the evil homosexual/feminist agenda and the destruction of moral society. Corruption is lying to the public about global warming and the selling of the Kyoto treaty. Corruption is giving up our national sovereignty to the United Nations. Corruption is the abuses of office, obstruction of justice, lying, perjury and subornation of perjury.

The Democrat Party is thoroughly corrupt. There is no question about that, but it's way beyond corrupt. It's also evil.

Waco was evil. The killing of innocent men, women, children and babies is evil. Torturing them for weeks on end, gassing them, and then burning them alive is pure evil. This was perpetrated by a corrupt and evil Democrat Administration and covered-up by corrupt and evil Democrat Congressmen and Senators, many of whom you are saying should be allowed to remain in office even today.

And as bad as that is, it pales in comparison to the Democrat government sanctioned and funded wholesale slaughter of the most innocent life of all, the murder of innocent human life in the womb. This is evil. Pure evil. And this evilness is openly perpetrated by a thoroughly corrupt and evil Democrat Party. The same corrupt and evil Democrat Congress and Judiciary whom you are now saying deserve to remain in office.

IMHO, allowing these Democrats to remain in power is aiding and abetting the corruption and treason, and is acting as an accessory before and after the fact to the murderers of innocent human life. Is doing nothing and allowing this evil to triumph evil itself?

I love my country. I love the Constitution. I love life. I love God. I know that the Democrats hate my country, hate the Constitution, hate God and hate human life. I see that the only Party capable of blocking and defeating the evil Democrats is the Republican Party. I see that many races are so close that as little as a one percent siphon of conservative votes to a third party could be the difference between success and failure. I see allowing a Democrat to remain in power when it could have been prevented as a triumph of evil.

JIM ROBINSON

[nopardons]

I have an understanding of politics, reality, common sense, a good education, real life experience, and knowledge. If you want to hurl insults, just because you don't like cold, hard, provable facts; that is against the posting rules and your problem.

Should you truely care to see who needs H-E-L-P, I suggest that you avail yourself of the nearest mirror.

[gunshy]

Okay, let's suppose we all go to the polls and hold our noses and vote for the republican candidates. You will admit, that some of these candidates are not the best we can come up with, I hope.

So what kind of laws can we expect from the people who smell but at least are labeled with the big (R). What kind of honor and integrity can we expect from the less than ideal candidates. How much of the nations treasure should we expect to be looted or spent on corrupt constituents or special interests?

Let me put this idea to you, what if Senator Robert Byrd and/or Ted kennedy decided to run on the republican ticket, would you support them? They would be carrying the big (R) label. What would you do, just hold your nose and pull the lever?

[nopardons]

Then you haven't been paying attention ... at all. Please do so. Go look at the people, who have been BORKED / totally ignored. Then, look into each of them and get back to me. You may have to change your under things. :-)

[gunshy]

That is a good point. It is neither reasonable nor logical to surrender the field simply because a few members on one side do not live up to some standard of political purity.

But this is exactly why we are being urged to vote against the democrats.

[Jim Robinson]

Well, do you actually believe that all of your ideal candidates will ever get elected? Or, as far as that goes, any of them at all? And do you like the legislation being produced now? Your method (allowing more democrats to get elected) will never produce change for the better.

Hey, by the way, I heard that Kennedy is now a Libertarian. You got one. Congrats.

[nopardons]

I didn't mention what sort of legislation they would pass. I talked about judgeships .

I'm not a mindreader, nor a fortuneteller; what I am is a life long student of politics and a political / news junkie, who has known / knows some of the players. Based on that, I can tell you that with a GOP majority, in both Houses, the things, that the president sends down, will get passed. It's monkey see, monkey do AND a desire to go a;ong, in order to get on the " right " committees/ get the chairmanship of the one they want. It's ALWAYS been so.

There are , unfortunately, many , with an R after their names, that I'd like to get rid of. First things F-I-R-S-T ; get rid of the Dems !

Please, don't degrade yourself, any more than you already have done. Kennedy, Clinton, Byrd, etc. wouldn't switch parties and you should know that. :-)

Oh, here's a hunch ... we could see a ban on partial birth abortion, with GOP majorities and this president. Now, you have TWO inscentives to get Republicans, of any and ALL stripes elected.

[Jim Robinson]

Hey, I don't give a rat's patooie who YOU vote for. Knock yourself out. I'm just asking you and your buddies to knock of the bashing of our candidates and our participants here on FR. If you continue behaving like a Democrat plant, your welcome will be worn out in a hurry.

[gunshy]

You didn't answer my question Jim. If Byrd and Kennedy were on the republican ticket, would you vote for them? A simple yes or no will suffice.

[justshe]

Time for the Judge's list....again?

From Rush Limbaugh's Newsletter, Aug.02

Who picked the judges?

Johnson 1
Ford 5
Nixon 7
Carter 38
GW Bush 59
Vacancies 95
Reagan 142
Bush 156
Clinton 359

Clinton appointed 47% of the current Federal judges.

If that isn't enough to motivate all the 3rd party voters to help re-take the Senate....then so be it. I just don't want to hear any of them bitching about much of anything.

[Jim Robinson]

B/S. It's a stupid question. Doesn't deserve an answer.

[ClancyJ]

Restore freedom in America: vote out the Republi-Crats!!!

I'm afraid you are totally warped. There is no hope to change your mind to see the logic of what we are talking about. Apparently you resent the fact that some like Bush. You prefer to call them robots or worse.

Now - I for one - like Bush. I will support him if I wish no matter what you think about it.

You have only one vote and you like to play with it as if anyone knows or cares about what you do with that vote. If you want to vote for socialism, leftism, liberal judges, abortion rights, more taxes, and more power for the left and eventually Hillary - feel free to do whatever you wish.

Some of us chose to vote for conservative judges, less taxes, a strong defense, the Bush team to lead us and to have control of the senate so as to prevent every piece of legislation having to be bought by allowing the dems a freebie that saps our funds. We want to control the amount of power given to the democrats, to control the onslaught of a Hillary, to control as much as possible the abuse of the system by the democrats who chose to hold us hostage.

Now that that is settled, do you feel better?

[nopardons]

Many thanks, for posting that. It helped a lot !

For some reason, some folks don't see what at stake. It's just all or nothing, for them. That isn't " good enough " ! I don't want N-O-T-H-I-N-G .

[gunshy]

Jim, I thought this was called the Free Republic, not the Support-Republicans-or-Else web site. If my comments about wanting to find and elect candidates who are honorable and principled offends you then please, pull my plug.

[Jim Robinson]

Ok. Buh bye.

[nunya bidness]

Now that that is settled, do you feel better?

We'll never know. He was banned.

[nopardons]

BRAVA !

[ClancyJ]

Ok - so you are voting democrat - why do you want to discuss it here? Have you gotten enough attention yet?

Enjoy your liberal judges, your increase in taxes, your corruption in office, your increased spending, the destruction of your military. Enjoy ever better gun laws, abortion, the nomination of judges only if they believe in abortion. Keep on working for your revolution which will never come because the democrats will quickly subvert any such effort.

[nopardons]

Cleanup, in aisle 7 !

[ClancyJ]

Why do they think Bush has been working his head off campaigning? Don't they think Bush gets pretty irate with the do-nothing senate?

He knows for a fact that the best way to make use of his time as president and get things done is to get a senate majority. Otherwise, it will be two more years of nothing or having to allow each piece of legislation to be corrupted to get it enacted. If anything, Bush does manage time well and works for results - not effort.

There won't be results until there is a senate majority. So, he tramps all over the country putting himself out in the public - a security nightmare in a time of war. Yet, the complaining true conservatives sit and type out complaints and moan how much they hate this liberal president and then they vote 3rd party to help the conservative cause.

In actuality, they do nothing for conservatism unless you call democrats conservatives.

Bush has and is doing a lot more for conservatism than they ever thought of doing. He deals in possibilities and results. They deal in complaints, destruction of any progress and dreaming, all the while smoking their joints.

[ClancyJ]

Have you ever thought that maybe the American public did look at the third party candidates and voted for others?