Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A ‘Scarlet Letter’ Law Fla. Adoption Statute Pits Fathers’ Rights Against Women’s Privacy
20/20 ^ | 9/20/2002 | John Stossel

Posted on 09/20/2002 12:53:11 PM PDT by ZGuy

Do you want to adopt a child? Thousands of couples want to, and thousands have been waiting, hoping, for years. Now Florida legislators have passed a law they say will make adoptions more "secure." Sounds good, but lawmakers have shown us time and again that their pursuit of perfection often makes things worse.

Critics say this new law will likely lead to FEWER adoptions, more abortions, and to children being raised by parents who admit they're not ready for parenthood. Take the case of Melissa Colleran. Colleran is an unemployed 18-year-old who's barely able to pay the rent on her Tampa home. She said she doesn't think she's "emotionally or financially ready to take care of a child." Unfortunately, she's seven months pregnant.

Colleran said she doesn't know who the father is, only that he was a stranger she met in a bar. "It was a one-night stand, something that just happened, maybe it shouldn't have happened, but it happened," Colleran said.

She decided she wanted to put the baby up for adoption, but the new law makes that harder. Florida legislators decreed that before an adoption can take place, birth mothers who don't know who or where the biological father is must advertise in newspapers to try to find him. Colleran would have to list the name of every possible father, and her name.

Colleran said she'd have to disclose "basically everything about my sexual history, within the time that I conceived. And I think this is disgusting, it makes me feel very ashamed."

So, Colleran has decided not to place one of the ads. "It is something that should be between me and the person I shared it with, not me, the person I shared it with, the guy down the block, and the guy who is reading the newspaper across from me on a bus," Colleran said.

More Shame, Fewer Adoptions?

Colleran says she plans to keep her baby and try to raise him as a single mom. "I was going to place the baby for adoption, and when I heard about this law, just thinking about people seeing my name and all these things in the paper, I decided not to," she said.

Other women are opting to have abortions.

"How far do we have to go to find the birth father that's a one-night stand in a bar?" asked adoption lawyer Jeanne Tate.

Tate says Florida's new law means fewer children are being adopted. "I see it in my practice. I see girls who are choosing abortion over adoption," she said.

So why require these ads? Because of horror stories like that of "Baby Jessica." She was the little girl taken from the only home she'd known when her biological father suddenly appeared saying, he hadn't know he had a child and that no one had tried to find him.

But will ads help? They may satisfy the state's requirements, but lawyers who talked to ABCNEWS didn't know of any father who'd responded to one. The ads sure do humiliate mothers, and they seem to make it harder for women who want give up their children.

"This isn't making it harder. This is making it final and secure," according to Deborah Marks, who helped write Florida's new law. Marks said the law would prevent biological fathers from disrupting adoptions.

Marks acknowledged that this doesn't happen often. She said she didn't have a statistic on how many fathers had disrupted adoptions, "but it happens sometimes."

Do we need a humiliating law because of something that rarely occurs? Marks thinks we do. "If we could stop even one of those cases from happening by doing some due process up front, it would be a benefit," she said.

The law doesn't apply only to young women like Melissa Colleran. It also applies to underage girls and to women who have been raped.

"There is no exception for rape. … You cannot just allow someone to say they were raped and use that as an excuse not to provide a name," Marks said.

Marks said she doesn't think lawyers can solve every problem by passing more laws. According to Marks, "It was already the law that you had to find birth fathers. … What this law did was lay out specifics of what people had to do."

Great. Humiliating specifics that discourage adoption, encourage abortion, and lead women like Melissa Colleran to keep babies they fear they're not prepared to care for.

Give me a break!


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: abortion; adoption
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

1 posted on 09/20/2002 12:53:12 PM PDT by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
I know I'm going to get flamed for this, but I think a man needs to know if he impregnated someone. I don't think it's fair right now, some men might want their child.
2 posted on 09/20/2002 12:58:15 PM PDT by I_Love_My_Husband
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Ping
3 posted on 09/20/2002 12:58:53 PM PDT by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
regarding Deborah Marks: The late Bugs Bunny said it best: "what a maroon!"

Oh, wait. This is Florida. Never mind.
4 posted on 09/20/2002 12:59:31 PM PDT by RobRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay
Ping

Thought you might find this article interesting.
5 posted on 09/20/2002 1:00:29 PM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
Abortion though, of course, no questions asked.
6 posted on 09/20/2002 1:02:26 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grlfrnd
I agree that the father needs to know. But, requiring these women to place an ad in the newspaper is not the right way to go. Why not just tell the woman that she is responsible to find the true biological father whatever way she can. Let her decide how to do it. Maybe the fathers should take some responsibility here, too. That is, if a man has a one-night stand, maybe he should find out the woman's real name and keep in touch with her if he doesn't want his offspring raised by strangers.
7 posted on 09/20/2002 1:08:53 PM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grlfrnd
I think a man needs to know if he impregnated someone

Then let the burden be on him to follow up on his trysts, if he's really that eager to know...
8 posted on 09/20/2002 1:09:22 PM PDT by Nathan Jr.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
Colleran said she'd have to disclose "basically everything about my sexual history, within the time that I conceived. And I think this is disgusting, it makes me feel very ashamed."

So, Colleran has decided not to place one of the ads. "It is something that should be between me and the person I shared it with,

If our culture had encouraged her to feel ashamed BEFORE THE FACT, perhaps she wouldn't be in this predicament in the first place. Colleran seems to think that everything in life must accomodate her every urge. Well, acts have consequences.

That being said, I do thing the ad thing is not a good idea. They could have a register that men who sleep around yet want to know if they fathered a kid (weird situation in and of itself) can check. If they spread their DNA around and do not check then too bad for them. But at least it isn't in the newspaper. That does seem a bit much.

Added to this, however, should be the option for the man to "choose not to be ready." He should be able to say "I am 18 and not financially or emotionally ready" just like the mother. Then advertise THAT! Men get off too easy, but women make it too EASY for them.

All the twisted consequences of the new moral relativism.

A rapist should never be a father in the legal sense. It is crazy to not make an exception for that.

9 posted on 09/20/2002 1:10:55 PM PDT by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
She should be ashamed, for being such a despicable whore.
10 posted on 09/20/2002 1:14:55 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
And once the father is located will he have all the details of his sexual history advertised in the paper? I agree that the woman should some shame over her behavior, but I see a double standard working here.
11 posted on 09/20/2002 1:19:04 PM PDT by Nathan Jr.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: grlfrnd
I agree that fathers should know, but this is not right. It will lead to more abortions and will lessen bio. mother's motive to put a child up for adoption that should be there. Besides, if this man is irresponsible enough for a one-night stand, why would he want to raise a child? This woman has it right. She is carrying the child and knows some else should raise it. Good for her. This law will make it more difficult, and as usual, regardless of the rights issues involved, it's the child who will lose.
12 posted on 09/20/2002 1:21:34 PM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Jr.
And once the father is located will he have all the details of his sexual history advertised in the paper? I agree that the woman should some shame over her behavior, but I see a double standard working here.

It makes me sick. I cannot imagine being a woman and not knowing who the father of my baby is. Many women have and liberals zealously justify the most repulsive moral standards imaginable...it's ok to be a whore, it's ok to kill a baby...everything's ok.

The problems with America are mainly caused by women. Clinton would never have been president and the Senate would be 55-45 GOP if women could not vote. Conservative women need to fix the problems with their gender peers. They are destroying the moral fabric of this country.

13 posted on 09/20/2002 1:29:02 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Hey, it takes two to tango, even if just for one-night. In the context of this story, there's lots of blame to go around.
14 posted on 09/20/2002 1:32:41 PM PDT by Nathan Jr.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
Abortion though, of course, no questions asked.

Yeah, makes no sense at all.
15 posted on 09/20/2002 1:46:44 PM PDT by Nathan Jr.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Why on earth would conservative women vote in alignment with men who don't think they should even have the vote?

Your comments are bigotted hatemongering.

See you at the polls.
16 posted on 09/20/2002 1:49:52 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
he'll never get laid...
17 posted on 09/20/2002 1:53:39 PM PDT by Nathan Jr.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: grlfrnd
why would someone flame you for that? It makes total sense to me.
18 posted on 09/20/2002 2:35:36 PM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Jr.
There is an inherent double standard. Women become pregnant and men don't. A woman will know when she is pregnant, a man won't. Get it?
19 posted on 09/20/2002 2:37:50 PM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
What he said is actually factually correct, at least with regard to the fact that Clinton would never have been elected etc. However, the same could be said for the minority vote too.
20 posted on 09/20/2002 2:39:35 PM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson