To: Stultis
Here it comes, just as I and many others here predicted.....lawsuit.
Poor Eunice.....we need to support her.
To: mystery-ak
"...Poor Eunice.....we need to support her..." She should never have given her name.
And cops, of all stripes, need to regard this situation as the reason why we will NOT identify ourselves when we report suspicious events.
6 posted on
09/14/2002 9:33:09 PM PDT by
DWSUWF
To: mystery-ak
I'm with you.
15 posted on
09/14/2002 9:46:37 PM PDT by
Howlin
To: mystery-ak
Eunice did the right thing. This sob's should know better than to 'joke', if indeed that's what they were attempting.
To: mystery-ak
Bump 4 Eunice
To: mystery-ak
will refute charges that they perpetrated a "hoax," ran through a toll booth or were "uncooperative" with authorities. It looks like Eunice will have support ---it's going to be too easy to show they did run the toll booth and weren't cooperative with the authorities. Even now with this lawsuit it proves that.
146 posted on
09/15/2002 6:43:02 AM PDT by
FITZ
To: mystery-ak
Here it comes, just as I and many others here predicted.....lawsuit. Poor Eunice.....we need to support her.
I don't believe she will have any problem raising money for her defence should it become neccesary. I for one will definitely contribute if the need arises. Any lawsuit by those mopes would be a major mistake.
169 posted on
09/15/2002 9:28:12 AM PDT by
Kozak
To: mystery-ak
I have not seen lie dector mentioned yet. Have all 3 perps and Eunice submit to a test, then let the chips fall as they may...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson