Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China and Iran Test-Fire Missiles
softwar! ^ | 09-06-02 | Charles Smith

Posted on 09/06/2002 2:15:48 AM PDT by backhoe

 
----- Original Message -----
From: <softwar@softwar.net>

Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:12 AM
Subject: China and Iran Test-Fire Missiles

> http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/9/5/185309.shtml
>
> Chinese missile page
http://www.softwar.net/dongfeng.html
>
> China and Iran Test-Fire Missiles
>
> Against the backdrop of impending military action by the United States against
> Iraq, China and Iran have recently conducted tests of their own ballistic
> missile forces.
>
> On Aug. 28, following Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage's visit to
> Beijing, the People's Liberation Army 2nd Artillery Corps conducted a successful
> flight test of its Dong Feng (East Wind) 4 missile from a launch site in
> southern China.
>
> The two-stage Dong Feng 4 limited-range missile was designed initially to hit
> the U.S. air base at Guam and later modified to increase its range to be able to
> strike Moscow. The large liquid-fueled missile is armed with an H-bomb warhead
> equal to 3 million tons of TNT and has a range of over 4,000 miles.
>
> China is estimated to have approximately 20 of the powerful ICBMs, which are
> capable of striking U.S. military assets in the Asia-Pacific theater, as well as
> targets in Russia and Europe.
>
> Most of the Dong Feng 4 missiles are stored in tunnels under high mountains, and
> are launched immediately outside the mouth of the tunnel. The missiles must be
> moved into the open and fueled prior to firing, an operation dubbed "chu men
> fang pao" or "shooting a firecracker outside the front door."
>
> PRC Missile Diplomacy
>
> The Chinese missile test was considered by Western intelligence sources to be a
> signal by Beijing that it will continue to develop, deploy and export missile
> technology despite a new agreement with the Bush administration on weapons
> proliferation.
>
> According to a recent report by the U.S.-China Security Review Commission, China
> is a leading exporter of missile technology. According to the report, Chinese
> proliferation of weapons, "particularly in the Middle East and Asia," poses a
> serious threat to the security of the United States.
>
> "China fails to control the export of dual-use items that contribute to the
> proliferation of weapons of mass-destruction and their delivery systems," noted
> the commission's report, which was published in August.
>
> "China is a leading international source of missile-related technologies,"
> states the report. The report also noted that China has reneged on previous
> promises and continues to export missile technology to Libya, Iran and Syria.
>
> State Department Denies Visas to Chinese Space Experts
>
> In a move seen as a response to Beijing's missile diplomacy, the U.S. State
> Department has decided to deny visas to about 20 Chinese space experts invited
> to attend the World Space Conference in Houston this fall. Over 6,000
> scientists, engineers and policy-makers are expected to show up for the space
> conference scheduled to start in October.
>
> The State Department flagged several members of the Chinese delegation due to
> "technology-transfer concerns." The word inside Capitol Hill is that the
> attendees were actually high-ranking military officers from the Chinese Army 2nd
> Artillery Corps.
>
> North Korea and Iranian Missiles
>
> Meanwhile, Iran also carried out an unsuccessful test of its Shahab-3 missile.
> The failed test flight from northern Iran occurred late last month. The Shahab
> missile test reflects ongoing Iranian development of the medium-range rocket,
> which can strike Israel, Turkey and parts of India.
>
> The Shahab missile is reported to be a derivative of the North Korean No Dong
> missile. U.S. intelligence sources have accused North Korea of working for
> several years with Iran to develop the Shahab system.
>
> In a recent speech in South Korea, Under Secretary of State John Bolton labeled
> Pyongyang "the world's foremost peddler of ballistic missile-related equipment,
> components, materials, and technical expertise" and a top exporter of missiles
> to "notable rogue state clients such as Syria, Libya and Iran."
>
> According to Bolton, North Korea's connections with Iran and Iraq, the other
> countries labeled by President Bush as constituting the "axis of evil," are
> reason enough to continue sanctions against Pyongyang.
>
> "There is a hard connection between these regimes - an axis along which flow
> dangerous weapons and dangerous technology," stated Bolton.
>
> Another sign of war in the Middle East comes from Israel. Israel has moved to
> defend critical targets in case of attack from Iran or Iraq. The Israeli air
> force has deployed units of U.S.-made Patriot anti-ballistic missiles close to
> the Dimona nuclear reactor in the south of the country. The Patriots are
> expected to assist a unit of Arrow anti-ballistic missiles already deployed in
> southern Israel in the event of retaliatory missile strikes from Baghdad.
>
> U.S. Tomahawk Armed With Directed-Energy Warhead
>
> An additional indication that war with Iraq is in the near future comes with
> reports that the U.S. Navy is deploying Tomahawk cruise missiles armed with
> newly developed "directed energy" warheads. Several Navy warships in the Gulf
> region are armed with the new Tomahawk missiles.
>
> According to U.S. Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. John P. Jumper, the strategy to
> use the new missiles is "in the works."
>
> "You have to coordinate the effects, no matter what forms they take," noted Gen.
> Jumper. The new Tomahawk missiles are said to be equipped with warheads that
> produce high-power microwaves. The directed-energy warheads are intended to
> scramble military computers and destroy sensitive electronics. The most likely
> targets for the new warheads are Iraq's Chinese-made air defense system and
> Iraqi chemical storage facilities.
>
> ****************************************************************
> FOR THE BEST ENCRYPTION SOFTWARE VISIT
www.softwar.net
> OFFICIAL SOFTWAR COMMUNICATION
> SOFTWAR EMAIL NEWSLETTER COPYRIGHT (C) 2002 SOFTWAR INC.
> 09/06/02 TO UNSUBSCRIBE REPLY WITH UNSUBSCRIBE AS SUBJECT
> ****************************************************************
>


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: axisofevil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 09/06/2002 2:15:48 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: backhoe


2 posted on 09/06/2002 3:24:46 AM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
Thanks for looking, and when you have some time, explore softwar!'s site... it isn't well organized, but has a lot of interesting National Security stuff on it.
3 posted on 09/06/2002 3:31:13 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Isn't it interesting what the technology Clintoon gave the Red Chinese has enabled them to do?



4 posted on 09/06/2002 3:51:47 AM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
Oh, yes... I've been waiting on the clinton-worshipping media to get a clue about this stuff for years.

Charlie Smith was on Mike Reagan's show years ago telling about MIRV's and dual-use technology, and how China had already cloned at least a thousand copies of our Tomahawk cruise missile.

5 posted on 09/06/2002 4:04:23 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
I support your view on boycotting Red China.

The only "problem" I see is the extent to which we have enmeshed ourselves in the Chinese web : some studies I've read suggest it would impact heavily on us : that we would be like trapped animals gnawing off our own limbs to escape.

I hate to think this might be the case; but, even so, we'd be a lot better off "losing a toe" than being at the mercy of China !

The architects of " Constructive Engagement " have much to answer for-regardless of political affiliations !

6 posted on 09/06/2002 5:24:32 AM PDT by genefromjersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey
...we would be like trapped animals gnawing off our own limbs to escape.

What a frightening picture!
But I am afraid you may be right (and even then, we may not escape).

7 posted on 09/06/2002 8:59:40 AM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
I try-one or twice a week- to stir up some interest in getting ourselves out of the trap our major corporations, and the political accomplices built for us; but, even with Boeing exporting thousands of jobs to China ( and they're just the tip of the iceberg ), there seems to be little concern.

I'm getting to the age where I probably won't be around when the feathers hit the fan; but I have children, and grandchildren who will have to face this; so I won't give up !

8 posted on 09/06/2002 10:03:31 AM PDT by genefromjersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

bttt
9 posted on 09/06/2002 11:59:21 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: backhoe; Dukie; joanie-f; harpseal; Travis McGee; bootless
China helped Iran, huh? Amazing, imagine that ... the map on the first book says it all.


THE DRAGON'S FURY SERIES

A Series on the Coming World War

IMHO, if we are serious about going into Iraq and taking out the trash and cleaning up there, we'd best be on a full war time mobilization to be prepared for what else hits the fan out of Iran, N. Korea, China, etc.

10 posted on 09/06/2002 1:07:35 PM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
No argument from me, Jeff- we are looking ahead to some "interesting times..."
11 posted on 09/06/2002 1:10:54 PM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
I'm really concerned if we get engaged over there (Iraq) in a major way (hostiles all around IMHO) without a very large buildup for contingencies.

We need to be able to handle two full scale theaters of operations, major theaters of operation ala WW II IMHO, before we get sucked in and then blind sided.

Just my to cents.

12 posted on 09/06/2002 1:20:12 PM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Oops!

to cents = two cents.

13 posted on 09/06/2002 1:21:17 PM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Thanks for the ping, Jeff.

.... if we are serious about going into Iraq and taking out the trash and cleaning up there, we'd best be on a full war time mobilization to be prepared for what else hits the fan out of Iran, N. Korea, China, etc.

Talked with some friends this afternoon, all of whom were of the opinion that Bush can't go into Iraq any time between now and November because he will be viewed as having done so for political opportunism.

While I completely agree that the enemies of America, both in the government, and in the media, will have a heyday with such a scenario, there was a time (and we knew the leadership of a President) in this country (only two decades ago) where such a consideration would not have held such political clout.

If information at Bush's/the defense department's/the state department's disposal shows that a pre-election move would be best for the country, and the war against terrorism in general, then the election (and the crawling-conveniently-out-from-beneath-their-rocks finger-pointers) be damned.

Yeah, that’s why I’m not a politician. Too little concern for public opinion, and not enough respect for façade.

BTW, Breath of Fire/Trodden Under are becoming more prophetic by the day. Get back to High Tide (That’s an order) (You gotta continue to keep several steps ahead of reality, don’tcha know, or they’ll start accusing you of simply reporting events rather than accurately predicting them. :)

14 posted on 09/07/2002 6:08:36 PM PDT by joanie-f
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Russia, N.Korea, China give Iran missile aid -CIA (9/8/01)
15 posted on 09/08/2002 1:06:44 AM PDT by Orion78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark; Askel5
BUMP
16 posted on 09/08/2002 1:07:39 AM PDT by Orion78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Orion78
Thanks for the link!
17 posted on 09/08/2002 1:42:47 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: backhoe; Jeff Head
See my homepage for more. Also if you need HTML code for any of the links in my homepage let me know and I will make them available for you.
18 posted on 09/08/2002 2:16:59 PM PDT by Orion78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

bttt
19 posted on 09/08/2002 2:39:47 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Orion78
Appreciate your generousity... I've marked the page & I think I can "lift" what I need... might do a standalone post of those links.
20 posted on 09/08/2002 2:44:34 PM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson