Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the Gold Cartel Will Fail to Prevent a Primary Gold Bull Market
Financial Sense Online ^ | September 3, 2002 | James Sinclair & Harry Schultz

Posted on 09/03/2002 12:52:50 PM PDT by Gritty

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

1 posted on 09/03/2002 12:52:50 PM PDT by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gritty
Is there a website or article that explains derivatives, how they work, and why they are used? Is the thrust of the article that JP Morgan et al. have piled up more sell obligations in gold than there is physical gold available at the current price of around $310/oz?

(I'm afraid this one's too much for my feeble little liberal arts brain.)

2 posted on 09/03/2002 1:12:19 PM PDT by SteamshipTime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gritty
Well, it looks like they had a tough time knocking it back down today. I was instinctively looking for another $309-$310 range to buy more. I don't see that so much as a possibility but I'll wait until tomorrow to see how much muscle they have or don't have left.
3 posted on 09/03/2002 1:24:01 PM PDT by imawit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gritty
Ya know, I liken this to shorting a stock. If the stock goes up and never turns south again, sooner or later you're going to have to take your lumps and cover.

Given this, there isn't enough gold to buy to cover your short in gold. And, on top of that there are some derivitive deals that have been made that further lien the short position in gold making the requirement to cover a short position even larger.

Some one tell me if I'm wrong.

My question is, how could these braniacs in finance ever figure that gold was going down below $310 if that's there pain point or down below $250 which I would guess is where they started their shorting and deriviting. What sign from heaven did they misread to come up with this scenario of gold lower than $250.
4 posted on 09/03/2002 1:37:00 PM PDT by imawit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gritty
Unbelievable how people will deny the fact that gold has, for thirty years (!) been a LOSER. Someone must be desperate to crank the price of gold up. It won't happen dude. We are in deflation. REPEAT AFTER ME, DEFLATION.

Oil prices low (about $.70 cents, after taxes, or pre-1969 levels).

Interest rates at all time post-Depression lows.

All OTHER precious metal prices down.

Productivity rising, but not prices. In any econ textbook, outside this goofy website, that is DEFLATION.

5 posted on 09/03/2002 1:58:48 PM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS
So why have I made a fortune this last year in gold and shares? Check out the prices of HGMCY and DROOY, which I purchased after 9/11. Have taken profits and building my retirement home in Northern Idaho.

Gold performs well in run-away deflation because of currency turmoil.

Do your homework.
6 posted on 09/03/2002 2:08:37 PM PDT by BigFisherman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BigFisherman
I have been having fun - for the lack of a better word - trading junior miners. You have done very well buying Durban and Harmony in late 2001, and taking profit around May. That gold run up in the first half of 2002 was a result of central bank reflation.
7 posted on 09/03/2002 2:14:53 PM PDT by Lee_Atwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LS
I believe the worst of the deflation may be over. The commodity indices are moving higher.
8 posted on 09/03/2002 2:17:02 PM PDT by Lee_Atwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f
Maybe I'm just jaded because I bought those Maple Leaves for $520/oz. in the 80's; Still waiting to break even.
9 posted on 09/03/2002 2:18:38 PM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
my dad gave me a maple leaf on my 18th birthday and told me to hang on to it in case I ever need it to get on that last flight to Lisbon. I didn't understand what the hell that meant until I saw Casablanca. I've still got it, plus a few krugerrands and US gold and platinum. I mean the bid/offer spread is brutal, there's no yield, the price performance is hideous, BUT if things ever really go wrong in the world somebody out there is going to accept gold as payment. Its like an insurance policy for a time when all the insurance companies have gone bankrupt. a last resort investment
10 posted on 09/03/2002 2:28:58 PM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LS
So I gather from your post that JPM is laughing all the way to the bank at the unlettered yokels who think that you have to OWN something before you can SELL it, or at least be prepared to make good your deficiency.

That's old-fashioned thinking at its worst! Money is worth whatever our glorious leaders decide it needs to be worth to make the world a better place.

As the great Democratic prophet Lenin said," After the Revolution, gold will be used for public toilets."

It's good to see his vision has not perished.
11 posted on 09/03/2002 2:33:29 PM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gritty
I for one am convinced.

I shall replace my Tin Foil Hat with a Gold Foil Hat at once

So9

12 posted on 09/03/2002 2:34:28 PM PDT by Servant of the Nine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babble-on
BUT if things ever really go wrong in the world somebody out there is going to accept gold as payment.

Probably the only really valid argument for owning physical gold. Gold (silver too, I guess) is something you can carry with you and it will have value anywhere in the world. No need to try to convert an out of favor currency (or bank account) from an out of favor country you may be fleeing to a valid local currency (or bank account) in whatever country accepts you.

You know, for large amounts of money, diamonds might be even better. Easier to conceal (you could sew them into the linings of your coat), harder to detect, take up a lot less space. Wonder why no ones' ever thought of that?

13 posted on 09/03/2002 2:54:09 PM PDT by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
Always look for a goldbug to quote Lenin. After all, they are the only people looking to communism anymore, because the MARKET has rejected gold in favor of money that is portable, divisible, and which has instantly evaluated market prices.

One thing's for sure: I would not be laughing on the way to anything except the poorhouse if I invested in gold in the last 30 years. I sold when it got to $450 an ounce in 1974, and laughed until it reached $930, but took solace in the fact that it then dropped to $300, where it pretty much has stayed ever since.

14 posted on 09/03/2002 3:18:23 PM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lee_Atwater
Hope so. But the key indicator is investment capital, specifically VENTURE CAPITAL in the tech markets. I see little evidence of that. Some, but only very little.
15 posted on 09/03/2002 3:19:08 PM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: templar
I think they have, but "IS IT SAFE?" (marathon man bump)
16 posted on 09/03/2002 3:19:20 PM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BigFisherman
You are speculating in gold. Good for you. That is a big difference than what the goldbugs advocate, which is HOLDING gold as a "protection" against the Federal Reserve.

You also rightly cite that we are in deflation---another anathema to the goldbugs, who harangue about "debt bombs" and inflation. What you show me is that smart investors can always make money. I envy you. For most of us, we rely on general trends and merely hope to catch the back of the wave :)

17 posted on 09/03/2002 3:21:14 PM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LS
What about the recent (last 6-12 monthhs) upward trend in commodities (corn, wheat, etc)?
18 posted on 09/03/2002 3:22:02 PM PDT by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LS
'...the MARKET has rejected gold..."

Just as the great Soviet People rejected capitalist decadence all those years. ;^)
19 posted on 09/03/2002 3:32:52 PM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
Clueless one: the Soviets didn't have a market. Gold has been tested and has no takers. Course, that's all a conspiracy, right?
20 posted on 09/03/2002 3:46:00 PM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson