Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Negative Wealth Effect and the Housing Bubble
Schaeffersresearch.com ^ | 8/1/2002 3:16 PM ET | Ron Taylor

Posted on 08/01/2002 1:27:54 PM PDT by shrinkermd

It appears the usual end of the month window dressing routine may have played a role in the market's recent rebound. And this week's economic data has begun to show a creeping weakness in the nation's economy. These initial signs of weakness, while perhaps priced in over the short run, provide a good example of how markets react when the reality fails to live up to investors' hopes or expectations.

The universally rosy expectations for economic growth in light of the Nasdaq bubble burst and the terrorist attacks of September 11 continue to illustrate investors' willingness to suspend disbelief -- even in the face of rising unemployment, a declining stock market, deteriorating GDP numbers (or should I simply say "revised" GDP numbers?), weakening consumer confidence and retail sales, and a developing economic crisis that's spreading throughout Latin America.

Given the recent negative developments in the economic indicators this week (specifically the GDP report, ISM, Consumer Confidence, and the Chicago PMI), I would like to again pull out the following quote from Crash by Robert Beckman. This particular paragraph begins the chapter titled, "The Great Property Crash," which discusses the 1920s land boom in Florida.

"The way the world really works is a very far cry from the way most people think it works. Pleasant illusions are far more popular than painful facts. The normal state of affairs is perceived to be one where each of us, as an individual, has an inalienable right to increase his or her wealth through time. Your familiarity with crashes so far should tell you that human beings will go to ingenious lengths to protect and justify their illusions, postponing the day of judgement for as long as possible. People will do almost anything to pursue their dreams of future prosperity through their speculative endeavors. Yet time and again we have witnessed, and continue to witness the massive evaporation of speculative fancies when it revealed that none of these markets is ever capable of meeting the demands of the dreamer. Bubbles are the stuff dreams are made of."

People's expectations for this economy continue to be optimistically high. We remain irrationally influenced by the 90s "new era" bubble mentality and our failure to accept the changing environment remains proof that we are in a longer-term bear market.

This attitude is again clearly represented in recent articles regarding the U.S. Housing market. A recent Financial Times article titled, "Houses are as Good as Gold in Troubled Times," illustrates perfectly this attitude. Today's Wall Street Journal article titled "The Housing Bubble Loses Some Air" more accurately lays out some of the current facts. These are:

1) Sales of existing homes declined 11.7 percent in June.

2) In Atlanta, there is a 20-month supply of houses priced over $750,000.

3) In Seattle, home sellers outnumber buyers 4-to-1.

Furthermore today's news that construction spending declined 2.2 percent in June to its lowest level in two years supports the thesis that the housing market may have peaked or may be in the process of peaking. Should this remaining support to the U.S. economy begin to falter, investors could be shocked by a double whammy of a declining stock market and declining home prices. This thesis goes to the negative wealth effect and its potential to create severe problems in the U.S. financial system. Both of these trends should be carefully watched going forward.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: bubble; effect; realestate; wealth
If this article is even close to being true, there will be more problems in the financial markets than I care to think about.

"The way the world really works is a very far cry from the way most people think it works. Pleasant illusions are far more popular than painful facts. The normal state of affairs is perceived to be one where each of us, as an individual, has an inalienable right to increase his or her wealth through time. Your familiarity with crashes so far should tell you that human beings will go to ingenious lengths to protect and justify their illusions, postponing the day of judgement for as long as possible. People will do almost anything to pursue their dreams of future prosperity through their speculative endeavors. Yet time and again we have witnessed, and continue to witness the massive evaporation of speculative fancies when it revealed that none of these markets is ever capable of meeting the demands of the dreamer. Bubbles are the stuff dreams are made of."

The above quote is priceless as well as timeless.

1 posted on 08/01/2002 1:27:54 PM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
In Seattle, home sellers outnumber buyers 4-to-1.
Do they break this down per price bracket? The market around here is (and has always been) hot for the under $200k ones. I'm sure we're just like Atlanta with the $750k+ ones no moving due to the dot com crash.
2 posted on 08/01/2002 1:38:15 PM PDT by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Crash by Robert Beckman
Can't find this book, Amazon lists some other titles from 80's by Robert C Beckman but not this one.
3 posted on 08/01/2002 1:45:15 PM PDT by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
I would say irrational dreams are the stuff of which bubbles are made. However, balanced optimism is the first requirement for making money in business. Americans need to regain their optimism and spirit. Make lemonade!
4 posted on 08/01/2002 1:57:40 PM PDT by VoodooEconomics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
bump
5 posted on 08/01/2002 2:32:53 PM PDT by kimosabe31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lelio; shrinkermd
Beckman missed his calling. He should have been writing screenplays in the '40s.

The housing market is borne ever higher by expectations of it going ever higher. But once the consumer loses his optimism that next quarter things will be OK, once the employed consumer starts to worry about his own job, once he hears more and more horror stories about middle aged professionals destituted after nearly a year of unemployment being reduced to the jobs of 19 year olds, he pulls back.

And there are always houses that have to be sold at whatever price they can fetch. People die, people move, people get divorced. Once the price of these houses drops the entire housing market crashes.

I believe this article. I have been expecting housing prices to crash for nearly two years now.
6 posted on 08/01/2002 2:39:37 PM PDT by Tokhtamish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
These threads should talk to one another...

Mortgages to Come With Equity Lines Attached [muslim mortgages mentioned]

7 posted on 08/01/2002 2:41:35 PM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tokhtamish
What worries me is that around here small 1/4 acre plots with tiny houses on them are going for $150-175k, up from $120-150k 3 years ago. Okay so you sell and the guy buying it expects to get $200k in 3 years. Then $250k 6 years from now.
Who in their right might is buying a small one bedroom house for that? They'll probably knock it down (price to demo it $30k) and build a new house for around $80k. So we're up to $350k for a new house that's still on a 1/4 acre. Its going to get insane.
8 posted on 08/01/2002 2:50:15 PM PDT by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lelio
I sold out of Eastern MA in April.

I'm glad I did.

9 posted on 08/01/2002 2:51:52 PM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: lelio
I just sold my small house on 1/4 acre for well over 300,000
11 posted on 08/01/2002 2:57:43 PM PDT by palmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
The stock prices of the homebuilders are starting to slide.

Richard W.

12 posted on 08/01/2002 4:53:52 PM PDT by arete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Real estate became lucrative in the last Depression, for a while, as it offered some possibilities for investment, for people who had some money, and certainly in production/industry there was not much to offer.

But soon after that "blossom," it is the banks which end up owning the properties, as loans default.

Banks become big real estate holders in poor times.

Probably, the federal government will step in, to establish local zoning controls befitting the nationalizing socialists' agenda ... but step in the name of helping folks by assuming the mortgages.

People will like it; until eventually the economy improves and then the other foot lands: the enforcment of federal laws about what you can and cannot do with your property.

See: Sustaining Nothing, Losing Everything, Sierra Times, June 20, 2002, by Tom DeWeese (posted June 21, 2002 by brityank).

"What is Sustainable Development? ...

On June 29, 1993, former President Bill Clinton issued Executive Order #12852 to create the President's Council on Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development calls for changing the very infrastructure of the nation away from private ownership and control of property to nothing short of a national zoning system.

Locally elected officials will no longer be the single driving force in making decisions for their communities. Rules will be made behind the scenes in non-elected "sustainability councils" armed with truckloads of federal regulations, guidelines and money.

According to Sustainable Development policies, air conditioning, convenience foods, single-family housing and cars are among the products that have already been determined to be unsustainable. Under such a system, the federal government, backed by an army of private, non-governmental organizations.

(NGOs), like the Sierra Club, Planned Parenthood, and the National Education Association will influence, if not dictate, policy in state governments and in local communities...

...The Community Character Act (S.975), and its counterpart in the House of Representatives (H.R.1433), is the legislation that will legalize enforcement of Sustainable Development in every community in the nation. The bill requires local governments to implement land-management plans using guidelines outlined in a federal document called the "Smart Growth Legislative Guidebook." This publication was developed with $2 million provided by the Clinton Administration to "guide" counties, cities and towns on how to "update their local zoning."

The Community Character Act offers grants to communities that will pay up to 90% of the costs for localities to "update" their zoning, but only if they do it the way the federal government dictates. The Community Character Act requires localities to "conserve historic, scenic, natural and cultural resources." These are euphemisms that mean more land grabs and fewer places where people can freely go about their daily lives. It means planned economies, restricted housing, and diminished use of cars. It means government control of property. The bill contains not a single mention of private-property rights protection..."

See: Stock-Market Stinker, New York Post, June 30, 2002, by Jessica Sommar (posted by sarcasm).

See Wake-up signals from Wall Street, Washington Times, July 3, 2002, by Paul Craig Roberts (posted by JohnHuang2).

13 posted on 08/01/2002 5:49:21 PM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palmer
Here in CA, I sold my house, sitting on less than a quarter acre, for $900,000.00. You ain't seen crazy housing prices til you have seen CA prices.
14 posted on 08/01/2002 5:54:02 PM PDT by LisaAnne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
See: Mortgages to Come With Equity Lines Attached [muslim mortgages mentioned], Washington Post, July 27, 2002, by Kenneth R. Harney (posted Aug. 1, 2002 by palmer).
15 posted on 08/01/2002 6:18:34 PM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LisaAnne
So did you do the smart thing and take that $900K and get yourself a 3000 square foot ranch with 10 acres here in Texas?

=)

16 posted on 08/01/2002 6:30:09 PM PDT by fogarty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: fogarty
Not yet, but soon. :)
17 posted on 08/01/2002 11:08:19 PM PDT by LisaAnne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

bttt


18 posted on 10/27/2013 12:40:32 PM PDT by First_Salute (May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson