Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Turkey preparing for US strike on Iraq
Times of India ^ | 7/31/2002 | N/A

Posted on 07/30/2002 7:22:43 PM PDT by a_Turk

ANKARA: Turkey is making military and political preparations for a possible US operation against its southern neighbor Iraq, Turkish Prime Minister Bulent Ecevit said Tuesday.

"The US administration is openly saying that it is thinking about a military operation against Iraq. This is not a secret," Ecevit told ATV television in an interview carried by Anatolia news agency.

"If a military operation takes place... this will inevitably affect Turkey... And we are making our military and political preparations accordingly," Ecevit said.

He was speaking after a series of meetings earlier Tuesday with Turkey's army chief, the president and the ministers of defense and foreign affairs.

The US ambassador to Turkey also held talks with Turkish diplomats. Ecevit denied the meetings signalled an "extraordinary" situation.

"There is nothing extraordinary at the moment, but we have to act very carefully," he said.

Turkey, a NATO ally hosting an US air base, is opposed to military moves against Iraq fearing economic and political consequences at a time when it is grappling with an economic, financial and government crisis and is heading towards early elections in November.

"Our economy, which has just started to revive, will experience another serious shake-up" if a regional turmoil erupts, Ecevit said.

"That is why we are trying to dissuade the US administration from a military operation and we are trying to explain them that we will seriously contribute to peace in Iraq... without a need for such a military operation," he added.

Ankara says the country already incurred losses of some 40 billion dollars (euros) due to trade sanctions against Baghdad since the 1991 Gulf War.

Ankara is also wary that turmoil in Iraq could lead to the creation of an independent Kurdish state in northern Iraq, which has been run by two Kurdish factions since the Gulf War under the protection of a US-enforced no-fly zone.

Such a state could fan separatist sentiment among Kurds in southeastern Turkey and rekindle a subdued Kurdish rebellion.

US Deputy Defence Secretary Paul Wolfowitz recently held talks in Ankara with Turkish leaders, who urged Washington to keep close consultations on its plans regarding Iraq.

Turkey is home to a US base, from where US jets launched strikes against Baghdad during the Gulf War and which they still use to enforce a no-fly zone to protect the Kurds in northern Iraq.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: iraq; turkey; usa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
This Times of India article is the first english language article available on this development. I was glad not to have to translate the whole thing from Turkish. Additional developments as reported in Turkish papers below:

The US has requested the use of all Turkish military bases for her attack on Iraq. The US has further requested permission to staation her troops at the Turkis-Iraq border. The politicians and top generals met with the president and have decided to ask the parliament to allow foreign troops on our soil, as well as allow the stationing of Turkish troops on foreign soil. The US has begun to erect a Patiot missile shield on Turkish-Iraq border.
1 posted on 07/30/2002 7:22:43 PM PDT by a_Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Shermy; Nogbad; Turk2; LJLucido; He Rides A White Horse; Fiddlstix; Torie; MHGinTN; ...
ping..
2 posted on 07/30/2002 7:24:24 PM PDT by a_Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a_Turk
The US has begun to erect a Patiot missile shield on Turkish-Iraq border.

Not sure that will do that much unless they have improved the system!

3 posted on 07/30/2002 7:29:38 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: a_Turk
Ecevit is straddling an interesting line. Some of which sounds like BS. Won't Turkey benefit immensely from cooperating with USA?
4 posted on 07/30/2002 7:31:16 PM PDT by PoisedWoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a_Turk
Ankara says the country already incurred losses of some 40 billion dollars (euros) due to trade sanctions against Baghdad since the 1991 Gulf War.

A strike against Iraq would probably be disruptive, but I would think that a change of regimes in Iraq would be good for Turkey in the long run (i.e., the sanctions currently in effect could eventually be lifted).

5 posted on 07/30/2002 7:34:53 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido
$40 billion is probably an overestimate by far. But they've lost a lot in transit fees of Iraqi oil, for example. The Saudis profitted by sanctions by making up for the Iraqi cuts. That's one good reason they're not to up on taking on Hussein.
6 posted on 07/30/2002 7:38:20 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Ankara is also wary that turmoil in Iraq could lead to the creation of an independent Kurdish state in northern Iraq, which has been run by two Kurdish factions since the Gulf War under the protection of a US-enforced no-fly zone. Such a state could fan separatist sentiment among Kurds in southeastern Turkey and rekindle a subdued Kurdish rebellion.

This is one of the major factors to be considered but can be handled as soon as the Government issues are resolved.

7 posted on 07/30/2002 7:47:31 PM PDT by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Ankara is also wary that turmoil in Iraq could lead to the creation of an independent Kurdish state in northern Iraq, which has been run by two Kurdish factions since the Gulf War under the protection of a US-enforced no-fly zone. Such a state could fan separatist sentiment among Kurds in southeastern Turkey and rekindle a subdued Kurdish rebellion.

This is one of the major factors to be considered but can be handled as soon as the Government issues are resolved.

8 posted on 07/30/2002 7:48:26 PM PDT by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; a_Turk
PATRIOT

The World's 'Indispensable Air and Missile Defense System'

If the United States is, as Secretary of State Madeleine Albright recently declared, the world's "indispensable nation," than Patriot is the world's "indispensable air and missile defense system." Effective against fixed-wing aircraft and cruise missiles, Patriot is the only currently fielded system capable of intercepting and destroying tactical ballistic missiles in flight. Since tactical ballistic missiles offer rogue states such as Iraq the best, perhaps the only, reliable method of delivering biological, chemical or nuclear warheads, Patriot has become an international symbol of security, the last line of defense against weapons of mass destruction.

ADA soldiers bound for Southwest Asia and Operation Desert Thunder eagerly pointed out to inquiring reporters that today's Patriot system is a much more capable system than the Patriot systems that successfully engage Iraqi Scuds during the Gulf War. Since the United States deployed Patriot to defend Saudi Arabia, Israel and Turkey against Iraq in Operation Desert Storm, a series of major product improvements labeled Patriot Advanced Capabilities-3 (PAC-3) have steadily increased Patriot's lethality, versatility and agility.

The Enhancements

Responding quickly to the Persian Gulf crisis in late 1990, Raytheon manufactured, assembled, and shipped more than 500 PAC-2 Patriot missiles to the war zone within a matter of weeks. Once deployed, Patriot not only played a significant role in the conflict, it also produced an extraordinary amount of real-time operational data. This information enabled the US. Army, the system's primary user, and Raytheon, the prime contractor, to implement significant improvements.

The Primary Upgrades

A Quick Reaction Program (QRP) has provided enhanced radar sensitivity, an increase in the defended area's footprint, additional radar changes to produce better target readings, and hardware and software modifications that allow the launchers to be positioned a considerable distance from the radar.

These modifications include:

Radar Sensitivity: The system can now detect tactical ballistic missiles earlier in flight, providing more time for the Patriot missile to reach its intercept point. This capability increases the protected area.

Launcher Deployment: System software modifications allow for the placement of launchers a significant distance from the radar. This upgrade facilitates deployment in dense urban areas and expands the area defended by the Patriot fire unit.

Radar Antenna Protection: Extraneous signals from nearby buildings and large aircraft have been reduced through the use of a shroud around the rear of the radar antenna and a reduction in the sidelobes of the radar beam. This eliminates the possibility of false target indications which can decrease the efficiency of the radar by wasting its time evaluating spurious target signals.

A North Finding Module and Global Positioning System: These features allow for rapid automatic alignment of launchers and radar. These functions previously were performed manually, and were both time consuming and labor intensive.

Guidance Enhancement Missile (GEM)

The GEM modification represents a simple upgrade, retrofitable into existing missiles, to enhance the system's capabilities against the class of missiles employed by Iraq in Desert Storm. Coupled with the QRP initiatives, this effort broadens the defense of a single area four times over. Another improvement has resulted in a faster fuze, which increases missile lethality at higher closing velocities by ensuring that warhead detonation occurs at the optimum time to destroy the target warhead, and not just the target missile.

Other Upgrades

PAC-3 Radar: The new radar will double the average power of its predecessor, improve the system's multifunctionality, and support expanded search sectors and new discrimination functions.

Discriminating Processing: This improvement leads to accurate in-flight data related to targets under scrutiny. This means the system can determine target characteristics, including velocity and reentry deceleration. This information permits automatic discrimination between tankage, decoys, and warheads, directing the missile to engage the threatening object: the warhead.

Patriot's History

Patriot began life in the late 1960s as an anti-aircraft missile system. In 1967, Raytheon won the first contract to develop and later produce the system -- initially dubbed SAM-D (Surface-to-Air Missile Development) and, in the bicentennial year 1976, renamed Patriot.

The development phase extended through 1980, when the U.S. Army assigned Raytheon to produce the first five fire units and 155 missiles. The Army activated the first U.S. Patriot missile battalion in 1982. Three years later, a Patriot unit was deployed to Germany to protect NATO forces from hostile aircraft. Today the system remains the cornerstone of the U.S. Army and European Contingency Force integrated air defense system.

In 1988, Raytheon fielded the first anti-tactical missile variant of the original Patriot system to counter short-range Warsaw Pact missiles. This version was called PAC-1 (for Patriot Advanced Capability). The PAC-2 version subsequently upgraded the system to protect against tactical ballistic missiles over a small area near a Patriot battery. This version was not intended to defend country or city-sized areas.

When Iraq invaded Kuwait in August 1990, there were only three PAC-2 test missiles in existence. Raytheon employees worked for months around the clock, including weekends and holidays, to deliver an inventory of more than 500 missiles before hostilities began in January 1991. Deployed against Iraqi SCUDS in early 1991, Patriot captured immediate worldwide attention and produced significant strategic and tactical results. Patriot's presence helped dissuade Israel from assuming an aggressive role in the conflict. The system enjoyed unusual success against the idiosyncratic SCUDS, which broke up in flight and presented multiple targets on almost every occasion. This phenomenon is one of the issues resolved by the upgrade program.

Summing Up

Raytheon has delivered more than 150 Patriot fire units and more than 7,000 missiles to the U.S. Army and U.S. allies, including Saudi Arabia, Israel, Germany, Japan, and The Netherlands. Deliveries to Kuwait are scheduled to begin in early 1995. A modified air defense system based on Patriot was also sold recently to Taiwan.

The improved Patriot system will:

defend an area considerably larger than it protected during the Gulf War;

intercept tactical ballistic missiles at higher altitude than those engaged in Desert Storm;

engage and destroy modern, low-flying cruise missiles;

remain effective in the face of all known electronic countermeasures;

more effectively discriminate fragments and decoys from missile warhead sections;

utilize these improved capabilities with minimal impact on training and logistics.

Patriot soldiers match the excellence of their weapon systems. The routine rotation of Patriot task forces to Southwest Asia since the end of the Gulf War in 1991 has made the Patriot air and missile defense force one of the Army's best trained and best prepared combat components.

9 posted on 07/30/2002 7:50:02 PM PDT by PhilDragoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PoisedWoman
Both Turkey and the United States have benefited immensely from an unusual alliance over the past sixty odd years. We owe Turkey as much as they will ever owe us.
10 posted on 07/30/2002 7:55:14 PM PDT by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PoisedWoman
"Won't Turkey benefit immensely from cooperating with USA?"

That all depends on what Bush and his people want to do in Iraq after Hussein is given the heave-ho. Unless a solid governing apparatus replaces the old regime, there will be nothing but serious grief for the entire region, rather like pouring gasoline on a fire.

11 posted on 07/30/2002 8:13:57 PM PDT by Mortimer Snavely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mortimer Snavely
Previous Turkish cooperation with the US against Iraq caused extreme financial distress. The day after the invasion of Kuwait, before anyone else said or did anything about Hussein, Turkey closed the border with Iraq and lost a main trading partner. Turkey took a couple of financial body blows at the time, and she hasn't really caught her breath back yet.
12 posted on 07/30/2002 8:21:04 PM PDT by Mortimer Snavely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: a_Turk
Very interesting.
13 posted on 07/30/2002 8:21:43 PM PDT by EternalHope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoisedWoman
Won't Turkey benefit immensely from cooperating with USA?
Our politicians still haven't learned one simple lesson. In international politics the world is like a mens prison. Get soap on a rope, and never say "after you."
14 posted on 07/30/2002 8:22:57 PM PDT by a_Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: a_Turk
Have you ever heard of a more publicized attack in advance? Lord God, either do it or shut up. If this is psychological warfare, it is failing miserably.

But then, I remember the long months before Desert Storm when Pat Buchanan among others were predicting all the 20,000 American body bags. The Iraqi people will probably dance in the streets when Saddam is gone.

15 posted on 07/30/2002 8:34:20 PM PDT by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xJones
"Have you ever heard of a more publicized attack in advance? Lord God, either do it or shut up. If this is psychological warfare, it is failing miserably. "

All that's left to devulge is the Date & Time!!

16 posted on 07/30/2002 9:36:53 PM PDT by blondee123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: a_Turk
A toast to the future independent nation of Kurdistan that will arise from of America's actions against Iraq.
17 posted on 07/30/2002 10:16:23 PM PDT by Destro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro
And who will protect such a runt? Who will draft their constitution? Who will they depend on to bring their wares to market? There is a whole list of questions such as these, sadly, none of which can be answered favorably at this time.
18 posted on 07/31/2002 9:55:41 AM PDT by a_Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: a_Turk
With all that oil in Iraqi and Turkish Kurdistan I am sure they can buy support (and you know that this is exactly the fear of the Turkish Pashas).
19 posted on 07/31/2002 10:21:04 AM PDT by Destro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Destro
I am sure they can buy support
They'll buy our support.. No problem.
20 posted on 07/31/2002 10:23:15 AM PDT by a_Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson