To: Texas_Jarhead
Yes, you did. The main reason I posted this was because I had also seen the same article, and thought it would therefore be relevant to post a contrary opinion. Given the facts presented, and the reputations of the sources, I tend to favor the 'map is authentic' theory.
4 posted on
07/30/2002 11:26:49 AM PDT by
sourcery
To: crystalk
Another interesting article I thought you'd like to see.
To: sourcery
Couldn't the parchment be old, but the map a forgery?
6 posted on
07/30/2002 11:43:07 AM PDT by
billybudd
To: sourcery
The parchament is old. The ink dates from the 1920s.
You do the math.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson