Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texas_Jarhead
Yes, you did. The main reason I posted this was because I had also seen the same article, and thought it would therefore be relevant to post a contrary opinion. Given the facts presented, and the reputations of the sources, I tend to favor the 'map is authentic' theory.
4 posted on 07/30/2002 11:26:49 AM PDT by sourcery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: crystalk
Another interesting article I thought you'd like to see.
5 posted on 07/30/2002 11:30:58 AM PDT by Free Trapper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: sourcery
Couldn't the parchment be old, but the map a forgery?
6 posted on 07/30/2002 11:43:07 AM PDT by billybudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: sourcery
The parchament is old. The ink dates from the 1920s.

You do the math.

32 posted on 07/30/2002 8:03:58 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson