Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RCW2001
After the reason for the letter became moot, Bush was approached by a stock broker regarding a buyer he had for his stock. Since the underlying rationale for him to sell still obtained, AFTER checking with Harken's lawyers, and his lawyers, regarding insider information and Rule 144 issues, and after they gave him the OK to sell, he did. He then waived the attorney client privilege to facilitate the ensuing SEC investigation. This is all set for forth in this article. There really is no there there, and this hit piece doesn't change the compelling exculpatory nature of the underlying facts.
7 posted on 07/15/2002 7:25:06 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Torie
There really is no there there, and this hit piece doesn't change the compelling exculpatory nature of the underlying facts.

Sounds as though that came right out of the "Clinton Playbook"...

15 posted on 07/15/2002 7:32:39 PM PDT by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Torie
"There really is no there there, and this hit piece doesn't change the compelling exculpatory nature of the underlying facts."

The media, however, is not concerned with "underlying facts". Especially, if they are "exculpatory"...

17 posted on 07/15/2002 7:34:52 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Torie
He then waived the attorney client privilege to facilitate the ensuing SEC investigation.

This is the point that should be shouted from the mountain top, given that Clinton attempted even to claim attorney-client privilege on "private matters" discussed with his "White House" counsel.

22 posted on 07/15/2002 7:37:36 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson