Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam Hussein's War Plan
UPI.com | July 10, 2002 | Arnaud de Borchgrave

Posted on 07/11/2002 4:31:37 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen

WASHINGTON -- If President Bush doesn't have a war plan on his desk to unhorse Saddam Hussein -- maybe he doesn't allow the New York Times to touch his desk -- the Iraqi dictator most assuredly has one on his desk.

It will include everything in Iraq's arsenal, according to what Hussein told his inner circle of advisers and two sons during a five-hour meeting last month that was leaked to a Saudi newspaper. "Everything" in this instance means weapons of mass destruction. Iraq is known to possess both chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction.

Hussein made clear to his acolytes he would wait for the United States to throw the first punch -- and then hit back with everything he's got, both on the battlefield and "all other fronts." This presumably means the activation of "sleeper" cells in the United States

The beneficiary of the Iraqi leak was Saudi newspaper Al-Watan-Al-Arabi, which quoted sources close to the ruling family in Baghdad. Present at Hussein's war council were two new officials "who were recently assigned by (Hussein's son) Qusay to organize intelligence cells abroad." It's a safe bet that "intelligence cells" in this instance is Iraqi jargon for "sabotage of U.S. targets of convenience."

Referring to the green light Bush gave the CIA to "assassinate or arrest me," Hussein, according to the leaker, said the U.S. president "has left Iraq no room to be tolerant ... His war on us is now declared and he is publicly leaking information today that he gave orders to use all means and weapons to violate Iraq's sovereignty and international law by assassinating me in Iraq."

Hussein then told the participants he wanted to hear their views and analysis "calmly without getting emotional." That is asking the impossible of people whose culture is hyperbole. So one after another, they emoted from the same sheet, working up to a crescendo to take the war to America.

The first to speak was Ali Hasan al-Majid, a presidential cousin who is widely known as Chemical Ali and is accused of being responsible for the massacres in the south following the 1991 uprising at the end of the Gulf War, "Mr. President, the Iraqi people have tolerated the intolerable from these Americans ... has the time not come to take the fight to their own homes in America? They wanted this to be a war on all fronts, so let it be a war on all fronts and using all weapons and means."

Samples from the others:

-- "The Americans must know that the heroes of Iraq can become human bombs in the thousands, willing to blow up America in particular."

-- "With a simple sign from you, we can make America's people sleepless and frightened to go out in the streets ... I swear upon your head, sir, that if I do not turn their night into day and their day into a living hell, I will ask you to chop off my head before the brothers present."

-- "I am confident that our entire nation will be set aflame (by the Americans) and they must know that the entire region will turn into rubble with Israel at the forefront."

-- "If (Osama) bin Laden truly did carry out the September attacks as they claim, then as God is my witness, we will prove to them that what happened in September is a picnic compared to the wrath of Saddam Hussein."

After five hours of "fiery elocution," all agreed "on the need for a strong response to the now public hostile U.S. plan and the importance for Iraq not to wait or hesitate."

All except Hussein, that is. He said the United States is using "all its dominion and tyranny not just to humiliate Iraq, but ... every Arab in the land of Arabs and every Muslim in the land of Islam ... just as (Bush) rejected (Palestinian Authority President) Yasser Arafat, he will reject Saddam Hussein, and tomorrow (Syrian President) Bashar al-Assad, and after that another Arab leader until U.S. dominion reaches the rights, wealth and destiny of the Arab ... Bush, his gang and his intelligence bodies should know that as soon as they start this battle or we get wind of its beginning, Iraq will turn from reaction to action ... At that moment everything will be handed over to Qusay Saddam Hussein to directly oversee the retaliation plans ... using all the weapons and fronts available."

Hussein's son Uday, according to the leaked minutes in the Saudi paper, still insisted Iraq should launch preemptive attacks against the United States. The dictator reminded him "so far the U.S. has done nothing except take a decision on paper. A number of officials know from experience that implementation will not be easy. (The Americans) have taken many decisions over the past 12 years and we have foiled them all. What's important today is to wait for the U.S. to throw the first punch and then we will not just react, but will act and take actions."

At the very least, concluded an anonymous top security official in a large Arab state -- widely rumored to be Saudi Prince Turki, the retired chief of Saudi intelligence who held the job for 25 years -- what will happen between Bush 43 and Hussein will be larger and more dangerous than what happened between Hussein and Bush 41.

Hopefully the U.S. Senate will get to debate war powers for the commander-in-chief for Gulf War II before the battle of leaks transmogrifies into an alliance between Hussein and bin Laden -- weapons of mass destruction and terrorism in the United States.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 07/11/2002 4:31:37 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Saddam Hussein's War Plan = LOOSE

Badly.

It's worked for him before.

2 posted on 07/11/2002 4:33:29 AM PDT by ChadGore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
what will happen between Bush 43 and Hussein will be larger and more dangerous than what happened between Hussein and Bush 41.

Coming up: "The Mother-in-law of all battles".

3 posted on 07/11/2002 6:21:56 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
Hey Rocky, watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat!
4 posted on 07/11/2002 6:26:29 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Any introduction of WMDs by Iraq will result in our use of tactical nukes - which may not dissuade Hussein, but will surely send a message to others.
We had them in the region during Desert Storm, but Bush the Elder could not pull the trugger - I think W will if he needs to, as it will make potential adversaries much more compliant, and everything else we do that much easier.
5 posted on 07/11/2002 6:26:44 AM PDT by Psalm 73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
"I am confident that our entire nation will be set aflame (by the Americans) and they must know that the entire region will turn into rubble with Israel at the forefront."

Suhweeeeat!

6 posted on 07/11/2002 6:37:25 AM PDT by Palmetto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
I smell blood in the water. It's time to attack.
7 posted on 07/11/2002 6:43:04 AM PDT by TADSLOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
This article provides persuasive evidence that Bush's war plan should consist of one (1) 100-megaton weapon detonated without warning over Baghdad.

Problem solved. Next.

--Boris

8 posted on 07/11/2002 7:38:23 AM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73
Any introduction of WMDs by Iraq will result in our use of tactical nukes

this statement 'rings a bell', but could you give its background 'cause many would label it incendiary.

9 posted on 07/11/2002 7:52:02 AM PDT by 1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 1234
this statement 'rings a bell', but could you give its background 'cause many would label it incendiary.

It was hinted at that prior to the Gulf war, the Iraqis were informed of what our response to WMDs would be, and I work with people who can attest to their availability in the theater during that period.
Hard proof? Certainly not, but I was just giving my humble opinion, I'm not a news reporter.
And I'm not sure what you mean by my statements being "incendiary" - will I get flamed for stating that? Why? It's just an opinion, and I didn't make any derogatory remarks about anyone, nor would it be deemed overly controversial, esp. on this site...

10 posted on 07/11/2002 8:10:58 AM PDT by Psalm 73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 1234
Prior to Desert Storm Sec. Baker met with, I believe Iraqi Foreign Minister Tariq Aziz and I don't remember the quote or paraphrase but the message was if Iraq hits us with any NBC weapons, to expect a devastating repsonse in kind.
11 posted on 07/11/2002 8:15:39 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73
...It's just an opinion, ..., nor would it be deemed overly controversial, esp. on this site...

as an opinion it's not controversial-i failed to see your first post as an opinion....no biggie

12 posted on 07/11/2002 8:24:43 AM PDT by 1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
re. your remembrance of a decade ago event: wouldn't it be nice to have an sumptin enunciated on the topic by BUSH 43, for the current era?
13 posted on 07/11/2002 8:29:11 AM PDT by 1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson