Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cachelot
First, you argued that UPI story was bogus and not actually published by the UPI. Now....you seem to concede that it is legit but are dismissing the source as not credible. It is obvious that you simply don't care whether or not Israel is supporting Hamas. This is a perfectly legitimate view but why not just admit it?
87 posted on 07/01/2002 12:59:50 PM PDT by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: Austin Willard Wright
First, you argued that UPI story was bogus

Err.. I think that if you take the time to read (you CAN read?) you'll see that I'm saying that it doesn't appear to be on any reputable news outlets. I really don't care much if it has ot one time appeared with UPI, or if it does today.

you seem to concede that it is legit

You seem to be somewhat slow. Let's take this slowly :).

Sale, the reporter and sole source basically says this happened. There is no corroborating evidence - Cordesman, another appendage to the jihad-infested washington-report, offers his speculation and Sale refers vaguely to various sources (anonymous official 1, 2, whatever). There is nothing whatsoever verifiable, and if there had been the other news-agencies would probably have picked it up in February 2001. Instead we see a campaign coming up to spam it around in 2002. Strange.

Now, of course I don't for a moment actually think that you are as bizarrely stupid as you're playing at :)). I do note, however, that you seem to be another one of these strange critters registered in '98,'99 who suddenly pops out of the woodwork when the ranks of "pinlighters" wear thin.

95 posted on 07/01/2002 2:49:38 PM PDT by Cachelot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson