Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Pledge" Judge is a Nixon Appointee
Federal Judicial Center Homepage on the Internet ^

Posted on 06/26/2002 3:07:08 PM PDT by Vladiator

Just FYI:

The opinion declaring the Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional was written by an almost 80-year old, white male Army Veteran Nixon appointee, Alfred T. Goodwin.

Goodwin, Alfred Theodore Born 1923 in Bellingham, WA

Federal Judicial Service: U. S. District Court, District of Oregon Nominated by Richard M. Nixon on September 22, 1969, to a seat vacated by John Francis Kilkenny; Confirmed by the Senate on December 10, 1969, and received commission on December 11, 1969. Service terminated on December 17, 1971, due to appointment to another judicial position.

U. S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Nominated by Richard M. Nixon on November 3, 1971, to a seat vacated by John F. Kilkenny; Confirmed by the Senate on November 23, 1971, and received commission on November 30, 1971. Served as chief judge, 1988-1991. Assumed senior status on January 31, 1991.

Education: University of Oregon, B.A., 1947

University of Oregon Law School, J.D., 1951

Professional Career: U.S. Army Captain, 1943-1946 U.S. Army Reserve Lieutenant Colonel, JAG Corps, 1960-1969 Private practice, Eugene, Oregon, 1951-1955 Judge, Circuit Court of the State of Oregon, 1955-1960 Judge, Supreme Court of the State of Oregon, 1960-1969

Race or Ethnicity: White

Gender: Male

You can search here: http://air.fjc.gov/history/judges_frm.html


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: nixonappointee; pledge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 06/26/2002 3:07:08 PM PDT by Vladiator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Vladiator
14 out the 24 active judges on the 9th Circuit are Clinton appointees; this court is more or less "Commie Central" among the Federal Appeals Courts.

ACTIVE JUDGES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Schroeder, Mary M., Chief Judge Phoenix 12/04/40 09/25/79 Carter

Pregerson, Harry Los Angeles 10/13/23 10/31/79 Carter

Reinhardt, Stephen Los Angeles 03/27/31 09/11/80 Carter

Kozinski, Alex Pasadena 07/23/50 11/07/85 Reagan

O'Scannlain, Diarmuid F. Portland 03/28/37 09/26/86 Reagan

Trott, Stephen Boise 12/12/39 03/25/88 Reagan

Fernandez, Ferdinand F. Pasadena 05/29/37 05/22/89 Bush

Rymer, Pamela Ann Pasadena 01/16/41 05/22/89 Bush

Nelson, Thomas G. Boise 11/14/36 10/17/90 Bush

Kleinfeld, Andrew J. Fairbanks 06/12/45 09/16/91 Bush

Hawkins, Michael Daly Phoenix 02/12/45 09/15/94 Clinton

Tashima, A. Wallace Pasadena 06/24/34 01/04/96 Clinton

Thomas, Sidney R. Billings 08/14/53 01/04/96 Clinton

Silverman, Barry G. Phoenix 10/11/51 02/04/98 Clinton

Graber, Susan P. Portland 07/05/49 03/19/98 Clinton

McKeown, M. Margaret Seattle 05/11/51 04/08/98 Clinton

Wardlaw, Kim McLane Pasadena 07/02/54 07/31/98 Clinton

Fletcher, William A. San Francisco 06/06/45 10/09/98 Clinton

Fisher, Raymond C. Pasadena 7/12/39 10/12/99 Clinton

Gould, Ronald M. Seattle 10/17/46 11/17/99 Clinton

Paez, Richard A. Pasadena 05/05/47 3/9/00 Clinton

Berzon, Marsha S. San Francisco 4/17/45 3/9/00 Clinton

Tallman, Richard C. Seattle 03/03/53 5/25/00 Clinton

Rawlinson, Johnnie Las Vegas 12/16/52 7/26/00 Clinton

2 posted on 06/26/2002 3:18:40 PM PDT by 45Auto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vladiator
I'll get flamed for saying this...I really don't care, but Nixon really wasn't that conservative. In fact, his opening of China angered many Reps. He was rather on the liberal end of the Republican Party. Had Watergate not occurred his presidency would've been as forgettable as Carter's.
3 posted on 06/26/2002 3:19:09 PM PDT by paltz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vladiator
He may be a Nixon appointee, but he's apparently suffering from senility in his old age and should be put out to pasture.
4 posted on 06/26/2002 3:20:20 PM PDT by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vladiator
The three Judges involved in the ruling....

The Senate make up at the time of the Nixon appointment was as follows........


5 posted on 06/26/2002 3:20:35 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport
How can this be? After 200 over years we are finally finding out that the Pledge is unconstitutional? Maybe we have been lacking for enlightened judges.
6 posted on 06/26/2002 3:22:14 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

at 6:00 p.m. pdt, the Freeper FRiva Feva contest will begin
join the contest to win your registration fees to the FRiva Las Vegas Conference
it's easy, just follow the directions - shouldn't take more than 10 - 15 minutes per night


7 posted on 06/26/2002 3:22:39 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vladiator
Nominated by Richard M. Nixon on November 3, 1971, to a seat vacated by John F. Kilkenny; Confirmed by the Senate on November 23, 1971, and received commission on November 30, 1971.

Four weeks from nomination to confirmation. When was the last time that happened? Certainly not under the last four presidents.

8 posted on 06/26/2002 3:24:46 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vladiator
Court of Appeals with Four Vacancies District Courts with Fourteen Vacancies

As of March 1, 2002, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit had four vacancies on the 28-judge court. For most of the past five years the court has had between five and ten vacancies that need to be filled by presidential nomination and Senate confirmation. The President has nominated individuals for two of the four positions.

As of March 1, 2002, there were 14 unfilled vacancies on the district court bench. The vacancies exist in the following districts: Alaska (one), Arizona (one), the Central District of California (six), the Eastern District of California (one), the Northern District of California (one), Hawaii (one), Nevada (one), Oregon (one), and the Western District of Washington (one).

So, the Senate should get off its collective commie ass and vote to confirm some of Pres. Bush's nominees.

9 posted on 06/26/2002 3:25:47 PM PDT by 45Auto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vladiator; deport
Also, Judge Fernandez dissented from the other two. He said that it was NOT unconstitutional.
10 posted on 06/26/2002 3:26:01 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vladiator
Henry Blackmun was a Nixon appointee also.
11 posted on 06/26/2002 3:26:03 PM PDT by Batrachian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz
but Nixon really wasn't that conservative

Can you say OSHA and EPA? A total liberal, IMO, but the libs couldn't forgive him for being right about Alger Hiss and Communism.

12 posted on 06/26/2002 3:26:39 PM PDT by Virginia-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

Really?.. You are getting something out of the ruling no one else is getting.

13 posted on 06/26/2002 3:27:19 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Vladiator
Call Federal Judge Alfred Goodwin and demand
that he immediately resign... (415) 556-9800
14 posted on 06/26/2002 3:31:13 PM PDT by WakeUpChristian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie
After 200 over years we are finally finding out that the Pledge is unconstitutional?

I'm not a lawyer, but I think the real bone of contention is the "under G-d"
which was added to The Pledge during the Cold War (during Eisenhower's Administration).
15 posted on 06/26/2002 3:32:38 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie
Actually, the Pledge only dates back to the mid to late 19th century, and the "under God" language was added in the 1950s.
16 posted on 06/26/2002 3:39:36 PM PDT by blau993
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Vladiator
First, Nixon was a very liberal president in many areas.

Second, federal judges are notorious for having their general political ideologies switch from one side of the spectrum to the other during their decades on the bench. This is why it's so crucial we get STRICT constructionists on the SCOTUS, not just "middle-of-the-road" wishy-washy sort-of constructionists, because you never know which way the latter types will end up going after getting appointed.
17 posted on 06/26/2002 3:44:46 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: paltz
but Nixon really wasn't that conservative

how about wage/price controls?
19 posted on 06/26/2002 3:47:20 PM PDT by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blau993
Actually, the Pledge only dates back to the mid to late 19th century, and the "under God" language was added in the 1950s.

That is true. Though I can't help but wonder if the Carter appointee wasn't even more offended by the phrase, ">>>and to the Republic for which it stands..."

20 posted on 06/26/2002 3:51:37 PM PDT by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson