Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Dirty Bomb' Suspect Not Cooperating, Wolfowitz Says
Reuters via Yahoo! ^ | 6/11/2002

Posted on 06/11/2002 7:06:16 AM PDT by MississippiMan

'Dirty Bomb' Suspect Not Cooperating, Wolfowitz Says
Tue Jun 11, 8:39 AM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A suspected American al Qaeda operative accused of plotting a radioactive "dirty bomb" attack on the United States has not yet given authorities information on his associates, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz said on Tuesday.

Photos

Reuters Photo
Slideshows
Audio/Video
(Reuters)
Wolfowitz also said Abdullah al Muhajir, a U.S. citizen of Puerto Rican descent, and his accomplices had additional al Qaeda-directed plans to harm Americans.

"He came into this country with the intention, by various means, not just the dirty bomb idea, of killing hundreds and maybe thousands of Americans," he said on CBS' "The Early Show."

Detained by the FBI ( news - web sites) in Chicago on May 8, al Muhajir was declared an "enemy combatant" by President Bush ( news - web sites) over the weekend and transferred to a naval brig in South Carolina.

But Wolfowitz said the former gang member had not provided information to investigators.

"To the best of my knowledge he hasn't cooperated at all so far," Wolfowitz said on NBC's "Today Show."

"He clearly had associates and one of the things we want to ask him about is who those associates were and how we can track them down," he added on CBS.

Wolfowitz said it was clear to investigators, however, that al Muhajir had had "a great deal of contact" with the al Qaeda network of Saudi exile Osama bin Laden ( news - web sites), and that "he was clearly taking a great deal of instruction."

Authorities said on Monday al Muhajir had trained with al Qaeda in Pakistan and Afghanistan ( news - web sites) and was in the planning stages of launching a so-called dirty bomb attack, which combines a conventional bomb with radioactive material, somewhere in the United States.

Washington blames bin Laden's network for the Sept. 11 attacks on New York and Washington that killed about 3,000 people.

Wolfowitz said al Muhajir apparently planned to get radioactive material for the bomb from somewhere within the United States.

"This man actually thought he could get them from places like university labs," he said. "I have no idea how difficult that would be but there is nuclear material around in a lot places."

The New York-born Jose Padilla, 31. who changed his name to Abdullah al Muhajir, was being held by the Defense Department as an "enemy combatant," which under the rules of war allows him to be held until the end of the conflict and questioned without an attorney present.

Civil rights groups like the American Civil Liberties Union ( news - web sites) have criticized the detention and said he should be tried in U.S. court.

"What we're about here is preventing," Wolfowitz said. "Preventing him from doing further acts, preventing those about whom he may have knowledge from doing further acts."

If authorities decide to prosecute al Muhajir he will be transferred back to civil courts, Wolfowitz said.

Yaser Esam Hamdi, an American-born Saudi national detained in Afghanistan, is a second U.S. citizen known to be held by the Defense Department.

John Walker Lindh, another American captured while fighting with the Taliban in Afghanistan, is facing trail in a federal court in Virginia. He is in the custody of the Justice Department ( news - web sites).

Wolfowitz spoke from a spot outside the Pentagon ( news - web sites) where one of the hijacked airliners crashed Sept. 11, to note that workers had almost completed reconstruction efforts.

Poised to lay the final piece of limestone, he said officials planned to also place a time capsule to honor those killed in the attack.

"It's also a way of honoring the incredible determination and resolve of the workers who put this building back together so quickly," he said on CBS.

"I think its symbolic of the resolve of the American people to prevail over people like Abdullah al Muhajir."


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: dirtybombplot; padilla; wolfowitz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-227 next last
To: MississippiMan
"I have no idea how difficult that would be but there is nuclear material around in a lot places."

Seems to me he OUGHT to know how difficult it would be. Or if not, he shouldn't let on that he doesn't know. This statement doesn't inspire a heap of confidence.

21 posted on 06/11/2002 7:36:46 AM PDT by TrappedInLiberalHell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMan
Puerto Rican descent? I would like to know if he is one of the terrorists that the Toon pardoned before he left office.
22 posted on 06/11/2002 7:38:01 AM PDT by lardog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone;howlin;rjaynej
Not all of the enemy are terrorists. Some are bleeding-heart leftists who object to the war on terrorism.

Quote of the year.

23 posted on 06/11/2002 7:38:29 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Carlucci
just a couple weeks ago a story broke that INS allowed numerous illegals into the country, (I think before 9/11) in order to track who they met. Our fine gov't officials promptly lost them and they are still on the loose. Guess they felt it was too dangerous to let this guy go, plus it helps to have a captured terrorist to keep the pressure on the liberal hand wringing socialists.
24 posted on 06/11/2002 7:38:38 AM PDT by tm61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lardog
Someone asked in yesterdays thread if he belonged to FALN.
25 posted on 06/11/2002 7:38:58 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
>Either we forfiet his citizenship FOR him, or we try him for High Treason.

Have you -- has everyone -- here gone mad?

We didn't tear up the Constitution for Timothy McVeigh and he actually did a crime! He still got a lawyer and a trial...

If we are going to be so quick to toss aside a citizen's Constitutional rights, then Richard Jewell would be rotting away in some cell right now...

It's unthinkable that a US citizen would be held without a lawyer and without due process. It's DISGUSTING that this is happening with a republican administration.

Today, this guy is turned into a non-citizen for "plotting" terror. Tomorrow, it will be some poor schmuck accused of "plotting" to picket an abortion clinic that gets tossed into a hole a buried.

Just as a reminder, let's look back some 2,000 years. The Apostle Paul was arrested in Jerusalem by anti-Christian activists. He was about to be tortured and possibly killed.

Acs 22:25-29 --

And as they bound him with thongs, Paul said to the centurion who stood by, "Is it lawful for you to scourge a man who is a Roman, and uncondemned?"

When the centurion heard that, he went and told the commander, saying, "Take care what you do, for this man is a Roman."

Then the commander came and said to him, "Tell me, are you a Roman?"

He said, "Yes."

The commander answered, "With a large sum I obtained this citizenship."

And Paul said, "But I was born a citizen."

Then immediately those who were about to examine him withdrew from him; and the commander was also afraid after he found out that he was a Roman, and because he had bound him.

We have achieved a level of political oppression unheard of even in ancient Rome!

This is what America has become. Citizenship has been tossed aside. Today it's this nut case. Tomorrow it might be you or me.

-- KotS

26 posted on 06/11/2002 7:40:06 AM PDT by KissOfTheSith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer
"… under the rules of war allows him to be held until the end of the conflict and questioned without an attorney present. "

Until the end of the conflict huh? Once he understands that this is a conflict with no end, he'll talk. These people are cowards at their core so he'll talk.

27 posted on 06/11/2002 7:40:10 AM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KissOfTheSith
Fine, then try him for High Treason. If the Feds have got the goods, then he'll hang; if not, then he'll have his fair trial as a American citizen.

This crime -- to plot with Al Qaeda to detonate a 'dirty bomb' -- if true, is certainly High Treason.

28 posted on 06/11/2002 7:44:00 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: section9
They had their ways, a week or two standing up with no sleep, he'd be babbling like a baby.
Maybe salt herring for lunch, no water till the next day.

There is torture, and there is Torture.

"Is it safe?, Is it safe?"

29 posted on 06/11/2002 7:44:09 AM PDT by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lardog
Puerto Rican descent? I would like to know if he is one of the terrorists that the Toon pardoned before he left office.

No. Too young. If this were 30 or 40 years ago he'd be the type.

30 posted on 06/11/2002 7:44:37 AM PDT by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: tm61
Being that he is of Puerto Rican heritage and born in the USA, it would be impossible for him or his forbears to be illegal aliens (PRs have been citizens of the USA since 1917).
31 posted on 06/11/2002 7:45:32 AM PDT by Clemenza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMan
Did you see the thread last night, comparing the picture of this guy to OK City John Doe #2? The likeness is uncanny.
32 posted on 06/11/2002 7:47:23 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KissOfTheSith
"Today, this guy is turned into a non-citizen for "plotting" terror. Tomorrow, it will be some poor schmuck accused of "plotting" to picket an abortion clinic that gets tossed into a hole a buried."

Abortion clinic protestors aren’t a clear and present danger to civilization organized and funded by a foreign paramilitary force that has declared war on us. Your analogy is unthinking. Your judgement is ludicrous.

33 posted on 06/11/2002 7:47:28 AM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: That Subliminal Kid
I realize that it's not a poplular opinion here, but I believe that groups like the ACLU actually strengthen our Constitution, democracy and our Country. We are strong because there are many layers of checks and balances in our system of governance. It means that the decisions made by those in power will not stand without being challenged. Many times the challenges will fail, but because they know of the challenges, those who take office may not excercise power without restraint. I think that's a good thing.
34 posted on 06/11/2002 7:53:25 AM PDT by MrMatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
High Treason in Time of War - isn't that a date with Old Sparky?
35 posted on 06/11/2002 7:55:31 AM PDT by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
Bust out the electrodes!

LOL,LOL, my thoughts exactly. Fire up OlD Sparky.

36 posted on 06/11/2002 7:55:49 AM PDT by Teacup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Either we forfiet his citizenship FOR him, or we try him for High Treason.

Both must be done in an open court of Law.

37 posted on 06/11/2002 7:57:04 AM PDT by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Eva
I didn't see that thread. Could you provide a link or the title? Thanks in advance. What a spooky thought!
38 posted on 06/11/2002 7:58:14 AM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MrMatt
"I believe that groups like the ACLU actually strengthen our Constitution"

I respect much of the results of their work. Overall, they may actually be good for the country. And If they spent half as much time standing up for the second amendment as the first in the name of civil liberties, I'd come closer to respect their judgment.

39 posted on 06/11/2002 8:00:48 AM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: DAnconia55
Both must be done in an open court of Law.

Absolutely. Perhaps part of the evidence might need to be kept off the air, since it would compromise HUMINT resources or ELINT techniques, but besides those censored portions, the balance of the trial or proceeding must be public.

40 posted on 06/11/2002 8:01:06 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-227 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson