Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN Treaty on Women - ACTION ALERT
C-Fam ^ | June 5, 2002 | Austin Ruse

Posted on 06/05/2002 12:54:41 PM PDT by madfly

From email:

Dear Colleague,

If you have not done so yet, call the White House right now and tell them to "Un-Sign CEDAW."
(pronounced See-Daw, rhymes with Hee-Haw).

CEDAW (Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women) is the most dangerous treaty the US has ever considered ratifying. Some call it the ERA on steroids, or the ERA with a vengeance. CEDAW seeks to drive women from the home and to drive children into day care.
CEDAW seeks to eliminate Mother's Day.
Sounds crazy, but its true.

The CEDAW committee has

Pressured China to legalize prostitution
Pressured Kyrgyzstan to legalize lesbianism
Criticized Ireland for being too Catholic
Pressured Ireland to legalize abortion
Pressued Belarus to cancel Mother's Day
Pressured Libya to reinterpret the Koran to fall within CEDAW guidelines

Some in the US government are attempting to get us to ratify this treaty.
This must be stopped.

Right now, as we speak, the Bush Administration is determining its position on CEDAW. You can affect that position by calling the White House and saying, "Un-Sign CEDAW." (Rhymes with Hee-Haw). The number is
202-456-1111. They are waiting for your call.
Do it now!

And for added impact, email Secretary of State Colin Powell at
secretary@state.gov
and write, "Mr. Secretary, Un-Sign CEDAW."

Do these things right now.
THEY are deciding.
WE can stop the radicals right in their tracks.
Do it.

Call the White House at 202-456-1111 and email the Secretary of State at secretary@state.gov and tell them "Un-Sign CEDAW."

And tell all your friends. SPREAD THE WORD.

Yours sincerely,

Austin Ruse
President
C-FAM



TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catholicism; cedaw; genderneutrality; homosexuality; koran; mothersday; prostitution; terrorwar; womensrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: LibertyGirl77
Bump. Thanks for those facts.
41 posted on 06/05/2002 3:38:59 PM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
We're overstepping our boundries. Who are we to tell others what rights they should have or not? This bothers me.

By using the word "WE" are you saying you belong to a UN or UN NGO group?

42 posted on 06/05/2002 3:42:39 PM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ME4W
bump
43 posted on 06/05/2002 3:43:23 PM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: madfly
And I bet the UN's favorite n'er do wells, the muslimes, are really big on this. LOL!
44 posted on 06/05/2002 3:53:07 PM PDT by liberalism=failure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harrison Bergeron
In effect, masculinity becomes a rhetorical currency by which opposition to global integration, state centralization and increasing ethnic heterogeneity can be mobilized.

It's been clear for some time now that the global socialist matriarchy, envisioned by those seriously radical feminists who swarm around the UN, doesn't have any men in it. The precise method by which men are eliminated is never discussed, but "masculinity" always seems to have disappeared. Those women are really creepy.


45 posted on 06/05/2002 3:57:57 PM PDT by Nick Danger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie; isom35;Kentucky Woman;Lazamataz;RFP;Nick Danger;concerned about politics; twigs...
From an earlier thread on CEDAW.

Posted on 5/23/02 5:48 PM Pacific by Asmodeus

Rumblings are leaking out of Washington that Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Joseph Biden (D-DE) and the Clinton holdovers in the State Department are conspiring to resuscitate the long-moribund United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW). A hearing was scheduled for May 15 and then postponed, but the State Department has placed it on a list of acceptable treaties.

CEDAW is not acceptable, and George W. Bush's entire constituency is up in arms against it. It was signed by President Jimmy Carter in 1980 and Bill Clinton made an attempt to get it ratified in 1996, but no one rallied to support it except the Clintonista feminists.

The notion is downright ridiculous that American women (the most fortunate class of people who ever lived) should submit to a treaty that dictates uniform rules for 130 other nations (all of which treat women worse than the United States). But the whining feminists induce some men to do foolish things, and endorsing this terrible treaty is one of the most foolish.

Ratification of CEDAW would be craven kowtowing to the radical feminists, exceeded only by the treaty's unlimited capacity for legal mischief. It would be a massive interference with U.S. laws as well as with our federal-state balance of powers.

Even Edmund S. Muskie, when he was Secretary of State, admitted that this treaty applies "to private organizations and areas of personal conduct not covered by U.S. law."
His memo said that the treaty completely fails to take into account "the division of authority between the state and federal governments in the United States."

Article 1 purports to abolish discrimination against women "in the political, economic, social, cultural, civil or any other field." "Other fields"? Private relationships should be none of our government's business, much less the business of the United Nations.


46 posted on 06/05/2002 4:08:41 PM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
Be afraid. Be very afraid!

lol

47 posted on 06/05/2002 4:13:16 PM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Snowbunny
ping
48 posted on 06/05/2002 4:23:28 PM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: madfly; LadyX; Billie; Snow Bunny; whoever; daisyscarlett; Liz
This is not a bad treaty, it is some sort of idea to take women not back in time, but to the ozone. It is absolutely surreal.

I immediately emailed Powell, and within seconds I got a canned response.

Thank you so much for the alert, madfly. I shall now follow through with my reps.

49 posted on 06/05/2002 4:28:07 PM PDT by Angelique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuzieQ
I got this in email just now:

A colleague from Massachusettes emailed to say she called the White House and told the operator she was calling about CEDAW. The operator said, "You want it unsigned, right?" I would say, gentle reader, that our message is getting through. Keep calling the White House (202-456-1111) and tell them "Unsign CEDAW."

50 posted on 06/05/2002 4:29:47 PM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Angelique
Bravo! to you
51 posted on 06/05/2002 4:31:20 PM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
You made a mistake. Masculinity didn't disappear. It is in those you know whats, except they are all plug-ugly, as my brother would say. I think they are asexual.
52 posted on 06/05/2002 4:35:45 PM PDT by Angelique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

Fellow Freeper Gals! Please ping your friends to this thread. I don't get to but 3 or 4% of the dicussions here.

Let's have a Freeper-Ya-Ya-Sisterhood Campaign to blast the phones in DC to UNSIGN CEDAW.

We must do what we can so that little girls who want to be little girls can play dress-up and mommy like a lot of us did. Just as little tomboys can rough and tumble and do their thing, all being free from the Feminazi's and their plans for the innocent ones.

Faxes and emails too.

53 posted on 06/05/2002 4:46:03 PM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: madfly
"Where had you heard about this when you wrote him.?"

This was a www.sixtysecondactivist.com action item a couple of weeks ago. If y'all don't already subscribe, you should. They have pre-written responses on many conservative issues ready for email subscribers to edit or send as is. It is directly linked to congressional emails so they can be sent at the click of a button (just enter your ZIP code), or the letters can be printed out for snail mail.

I always email Byrd and Rockef***er which always burdens their office to reply. Usually I get canned response hard copy letters which waffle and don't identify a position. But, this time I was pleased to get John Boy's position on this horrible CEDAW UN POS for use as ammo for his challenger, Jay Wolfe. "Jay Wolfe - Our Values. Our Senator." "Retire Rockefeller. Give him his pink slip!"

54 posted on 06/05/2002 7:47:05 PM PDT by RFP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Angelique
The UN women's groups are radical liberals.
55 posted on 06/05/2002 8:22:18 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Annotated CEDAW Bibliography

"I call on the Senate, again, to ratify the United Nations Convention on the elimination of all forms ofdiscrimination against women ... it is, to say the least, an embarrassment that the United States has not done this...

President Bill Clinton
Human Rights Day, December 10, 1996

"...it is long past time for America to become party to the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women.

Secretary of State Madeleine Albright
March 12, 1997

"Violence and discrimination against women don't just victimize individuals; they hold back wholesocieties ... Guaranteeing human rights is a moral imperative with respect to both women and men. It isalso an investment in making whole nations stronger, fairer, and better. "

From the official U.S. Government statement to the World
Conference on Human Rights, Vienna, Austria, 1993

UNIFEM

Earth Summit 2002 Toolkit

CEDAW 27th Session - 3 - 21 June 2002

56 posted on 06/06/2002 12:35:03 AM PDT by hammerdown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Local Implementation of CEDAW

On April 14, 1998, San Francisco became the first city in the United States to adopt and pass legislation implementing the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW). This is a quick guide for those considering implementing CEDAW in your own city or county.

57 posted on 06/06/2002 1:20:47 AM PDT by hammerdown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

Completed City & County of San Francisco department gender analyses, including the Adult Probation Department, Department of Public Works, Juvenile Probation Department, Arts Commission, Rent Board, Department on the Environment.
58 posted on 06/06/2002 1:31:29 AM PDT by hammerdown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Bump, for Mother's.

The most important job in the world.

59 posted on 06/06/2002 4:41:32 AM PDT by Eustace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HAMMERDOWN
This is like the Smart Growth Crap. It starts at the top and if it's not approved by the state, then it goes to the County, the to the cities. Is this how it is supposed to work? Just pick one, Country, State, County or City? And with smart growth, we'll have the village rule!. I am so sick of the UN in our lives.

time for coffee

60 posted on 06/06/2002 6:40:25 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson