[liberalism=failure]

You can try and scapegoat this one off if you want to, but the truth is--The only one inducing apathy by dissilusion is George W Himself, who has enacted more liberalism than Ted Kennedy, Jesse Jackson and Hillary Clinton combined.

And all this reaching out is supposed to get us a repub senate, well guess what, republican polsters all over the place are saying that local issues are what the votes will be about. SO it looks to me like for all this "reaching out" we may not even get a republican senate. SOunds good huh? We get all this liberalism and a good chance of nothing to show for it.

Nonetheless, I intend to vote on November, but if the strategerie doesn't change after that, I'm not going to the polls in '04.

[Dane]

You can try and scapegoat this one off if you want to, but the truth is--The only one inducing apathy by dissilusion is George W Himself, who has enacted more liberalism than Ted Kennedy, Jesse Jackson and Hillary Clinton combined

Yeah right. Hillary, Ted, and Jesse would push through a tax cut, give the UN the finger on global taxation, and say that the 2nd amendment is an individual right.

Your beating the chains on your back self-flagellation act gets tiresome.

[Catholicguy]

Nonetheless, I intend to vote on November, but if the strategerie doesn't change after that, I'm not going to the polls in '04

There will always be enough voters that will take this approach. Remember the "Reagan Revolution?" Open up an Almanac and check out the "Budget." Look at where it was when Reagan was elected and look where it is now.

How many more "victories" can conservatives afford?