Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FBI given broad authority to monitor churches, libraries, Internet, political parties
Associated Press / SFGate

Posted on 05/30/2002 12:03:20 PM PDT by RCW2001

TED BRIDIS, Associated Press Writer
Thursday, May 30, 2002
©2002 Associated Press

URL: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2002/05/30/national1450EDT0662.DTL

(05-30) 11:50 PDT WASHINGTON (AP) --

The Justice Department sharply eased restrictions on domestic spying Thursday, handing the FBI broad, new authority to monitor Internet sites, libraries, churches and political organizations for clues to terrorist plots.

The changes were announced by Attorney General John Ashcroft and FBI Director Robert Mueller.

Ashcroft, claiming FBI agents in the field have been hampered by a range of bureaucratic restrictions, said the new guidelines would help them to do their jobs.

"These restrictions are a competitive advantage for terrorists," Ashcroft said of existing rules.

He said, for instance, that under present guidelines, FBI agents "cannot surf the Web, the way you and I can," and cannot simply walk into public events to observe people and activities.

The new guidelines give FBI agents more freedom to investigate terrorism even when they are not pursuing a particular case.

©2002 Associated Press  


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: espionagelist; privacylist; terrorwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

1 posted on 05/30/2002 12:03:20 PM PDT by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
And the terrorist win another round.
2 posted on 05/30/2002 12:05:52 PM PDT by eFudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
More...

05-30) 12:04 PDT (AP) --

Asked whether the change would lead to a rollback of hard-won civil-liberties protections, Ashcroft said the powers would be used only "for the purpose of detecting and preventing terrorism."

"It's not to be abused for other purposes," he said.

Ashcroft said nothing in the guidelines would permit the FBI to routinely build files on people or organizations.

"The abuses that have been alleged about the FBI decades ago ... would not be allowed," he said, referring to the practice of keeping files and records on prominent figures.

The new rules allow agents to conduct "general topical research" and "pure surfing" designed to find Web sites, chat rooms or Internet bulletin boards with information about terror, bomb-making instructions, child pornography or stolen credit cards.

©2002 Associated Press  

3 posted on 05/30/2002 12:07:45 PM PDT by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Ashcroft, claiming FBI agents in the field have been hampered by a range of bureaucratic restrictions, said the new guidelines would help them to do their jobs

It's only a partial solution. The career bureacrats in the DC office need to be replaced as well with some fresh faces from the field with energy and fresh ideas.

4 posted on 05/30/2002 12:08:52 PM PDT by TADSLOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
...and MOSQUES???? ...hint, hint...
5 posted on 05/30/2002 12:09:21 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
"Churches" means "mosques." Already, the usual suspects, including John Conyers who represents a Muslim constituency, are squealing like stuck pigs.
6 posted on 05/30/2002 12:09:25 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
"Churches" means "mosques." Already, the usual suspects, including John Conyers who represents a Muslim constituency, are squealing like stuck pigs.
7 posted on 05/30/2002 12:09:25 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eFudd
And the terrorist win another round.

Funny, I don't think the terrorists would agree with you.

8 posted on 05/30/2002 12:10:18 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Yes, they would never abuse this authority. You can trust the FBI.
9 posted on 05/30/2002 12:10:22 PM PDT by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
COINTELPRO
10 posted on 05/30/2002 12:12:23 PM PDT by freeeee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Of course I'm sure we could spare an agenda or two to do 'pedophile watch' at a few of our Catholic institutions or 'anti-abortion terrorist watch' at some of our finer Baptist congregations...
11 posted on 05/30/2002 12:15:12 PM PDT by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
In Phoenix, We're Terrorists
12 posted on 05/30/2002 12:17:43 PM PDT by Native American Female Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
No Shi'ite!
13 posted on 05/30/2002 12:18:26 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
I feel safer already.(/sarcasm)

I can't wait for these new procedures to fall into the hands of the future Hillary Clinton administration.

14 posted on 05/30/2002 12:19:29 PM PDT by Snake65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: sinkspur
I fail to see why the FBI would not be allowed to monitor Internet sites--such sites are publicly available information and have no expectation of privacy.
16 posted on 05/30/2002 12:20:00 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Snake65
Already did. Remember the 900 FBI files ?
17 posted on 05/30/2002 12:21:03 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
A cursory review of the Bill of Rights would reveal that such "authority" is not the DOJ's to give.....
18 posted on 05/30/2002 12:22:59 PM PDT by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Oh that. Well they were in the experienced hands of Craig Livingstone, I presume. Don't worry, be happy.
19 posted on 05/30/2002 12:23:21 PM PDT by Snake65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: freeeee
COINTELPRO

Isn't it funny how everything from the 60s & 70s makes a comeback?

20 posted on 05/30/2002 12:24:32 PM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson