Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Won't Kill Cheney Energy Suits
AP ^ | May 23, 2002, 3:34 PM EDT | PETE YOST

Posted on 05/23/2002 1:27:44 PM PDT by Jean S

WASHINGTON --

A judge on Thursday rebuffed a Bush administration effort to kill lawsuits aimed at revealing the inner workings of Vice President Dick Cheney's energy task force.

U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan said he will allow the private groups Judicial Watch and the Sierra Club to take the first step in delving into the operations of the task force.

Run by Cabinet heads, the Cheney panel directed federal agencies in writing a plan last year that focused on expanding energy production -- a position favored by the industry.

Sullivan said he may require that any material from the Cheney panel be turned over to him instead of to the private groups until he decides whether there is a legal basis for the case to proceed.

The administration maintains that only government employees were members of the task force, which disbanded last year. But the conservative group Judicial Watch alleges that former Enron chairman Ken Lay and lobbyists Mark Racicot, Haley Barbour and Thomas Kuhn were members.

Racicot is now Republican National Committee chairman. The ex-Enron chairman and the three current and former lobbyists are defendants in the Judicial Watch case, with which the Sierra Club lawsuit has been combined.

Outside the courtroom, Alex Levinson of the Sierra Club said that "if Enron wrote part of the White House's energy policy, we want to know about it." The White House has acknowledged half a dozen meetings between Enron and Cheney or his aides on the task force.

Larry Klayman of Judicial Watch said the administration's strategy is to "run out the clock" and to fight disclosing the people the task force met with until the public has moved onto other issues.

The Cheney plan, which favors oil and gas drilling on public land and rejuvenating nuclear power, provided the starting point for wide-ranging energy legislation currently before Congress.

In several tense exchanges with the judge during a three-hour hearing, Justice Department lawyer Shannen Coffin insisted Sullivan had ample basis to throw out the lawsuits. Coffin cited President Bush's written directive saying he was creating the Cheney task force in order to advise him on national energy policy.

Coffin said top aides are entitled to provide advice on a confidential basis to the president. Coffin also said the lawsuits are moot because the task force no longer exists.

Judicial Watch and the Sierra Club maintain that Cheney's panel is subject to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, which is designed to open government panels in the executive branch to public scrutiny. The idea behind the law is that public disclosure would counteract lobbying by special interests.

The judge did knock out one basis for the lawsuits against Cheney and the task force. But the question of whether Cheney and the task force were subject to the advisory committee act remains.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: judicialwatch

1 posted on 05/23/2002 1:27:45 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Judical Watch and the Sierra Club?

Lawsuits certainly make for strange bedfellows.

2 posted on 05/23/2002 1:41:09 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To whom it may concern:

We don't have a tool to add keywords. Sorry.

3 posted on 05/23/2002 1:44:40 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Larry Klayman of Judicial Watch said the administration's strategy is to "run out the clock" and to fight disclosing the people the task force met with until the public has moved onto other issues.

ROFLMAO.

4 posted on 05/23/2002 2:03:30 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
I cannot believe that Judicial Watch is teaming up with the SIERRA CLUB! I suppose that completely kills the idea that Klayman is a conservative.

The question is, is Klayman an equal opportunity government watchdog, or is he merely an opportunist?

5 posted on 05/23/2002 2:05:19 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
Lawsuits certainly make for strange bedfellows.

My, my, my........they certainly do.

I guess old Larry will grab on to anything he thinks will work. This is pathetic.

6 posted on 05/23/2002 2:06:08 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Since this is the best Pete YostTM (DNC) could do, the hearing must have gone very well for the administration.

"The judge did knock out one basis for the lawsuits against Cheney and the task force. "
I wonder what that was Petey.

7 posted on 05/23/2002 2:06:36 PM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Catspaw
Emmet Sullivan; let me guess... a Clinton appointee?
9 posted on 05/23/2002 2:17:33 PM PDT by CPT Clay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2witness
Apparently Cheney also met with the Sierra Club:

Responding to an accusation that the administration's energy plan was fashioned by corporations and business interests the vice president told an interviewer that "11 out of 12" suggestions proffered by the Sierra Club, the liberal environmental activist organization, were accepted by his energy task force.

In recent days, Cheney has also defended keeping private the roster of his task force gatherings by invoking the Sierra Club. They too, met with him and his committee, Cheney said. So why do they complain that Enron received too much access?

For one thing, said David Willett, a Sierra Club spokesperson, these 12 recommendations were really just bullet points on a Web fact sheet — one released, in part, to point out the differences between Sierra's position and the administration's proposal.


10 posted on 05/23/2002 2:24:02 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
Bump
11 posted on 05/23/2002 2:54:18 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
This article needs a new title. If it had Sierra Club and/or JW in the title, it would have 500 comments by now.
12 posted on 05/23/2002 3:23:46 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amelia; Howlin
Yes, the Sierra Club was invited in and that's why I can't figure out why they've enjoined here. Must be (like Klayman) for looks and fundraising purposes.
13 posted on 05/23/2002 3:51:57 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
I want oil.
14 posted on 05/23/2002 7:53:35 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson