Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pakistan "ready for full-fledged war" / US fears Indian attack on PoK camps
UNI, PTI ^ | 19th May 2002

Posted on 05/19/2002 6:39:42 AM PDT by maquiladora

Pakistan "ready for full-fledged war"

Islamabad, May 19. (UNI, PTI): Pakistan has said that its defence preparation equals India's and is ready for a full-fledged war if attacked, Pakistan's Defence spokesman Maj. Gen. Rashid Qureshi was quoted as saying by leading newspaper The Nation today.

Observing that retaliatory action in Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK) or a limited war could take the shape of a total war, Qureshi said, "We are ready to face all sorts of situations and India is also well aware of the results."

Regarding the possibility of conflict in PoK, Qureshi claimed such a war would be fought from the heights and India would not be in a position to gain anything from the "superiority" of its air and mechanised forces.

Referring to the continuing skirmishes on the LoC and expulsion of Pakistan's High Commissioner from India, he charged India with trying to destabilise Pakistan before the General Elections in October.

He also accused India of aggravating the situation by asking Islamabad to withdraw its High Commissioner to New Delhi, and said that he believed India might not launch a full-scale war against it but could attack Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK).

"I think India will not launch a full-scale war but there is a danger of an Indian attack" on PoK and the "Working Boundary" Qureshi told editors and senior journalist in Lahore yesterday.

Qureshi, also Press Secretary to President Pervez Musharraf, however, said he was not ruling out the possibility and probabil ity of a full-scale war.

US fears Indian attack on PoK camps

New York, May 19. (PTI): As tensions mount on the Indo-Pak bor der, American officials are increasingly worried that India might carry out an air or commando strike on training camps for mili tants in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), a media report said today.

More than 70 camps have recently sprung up, staffed by groups that Pakistan ostensibly banned, but they have regrouped under different names, the New York Times reported.

Describing the Indian government decision asking Pakistan High Commissioner Ashraf Jehangir Qazi to leave the country as a "diplomatic slap" to Pakistan, it quoted a senior Indian official as saying that this was just a preliminary step with more weighty decisions yet to come.

"This is a signal to both Pakistan and the West that India is serious about doing whatever it takes to bring this menace to an end," he said.

Such talk, the Times said, is stoking fears among American offi cials that war may be looming between India and Pakistan, both of which have nuclear weapons.

Noting mobilisation of troops on the border, the paper said "India now seems to be taking the steps needed to go to war."

It quoted experts as saying that an armed conflict between India and Pakistan could endanger American forces searching for Al Qaeda and Taliban operatives in Pakistan and spiral into a full- scale war between the two countries.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: india; kashmir; pakistan; southasialist; terror; war

1 posted on 05/19/2002 6:39:42 AM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
I wonder why all the news outlets on TV aren't covering the India/Pakistan conflict. Haven't seen anything all weekend on it. You have the Pearle murder, 9/11 security and the new Israel bombing but nothing about nuclear war on the Sub-Contintent.
2 posted on 05/19/2002 7:33:14 AM PDT by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
I doubt there is a soul in the U.S. worried about India's attack on terrorist training camps in Pak. Pak reportedly airlifted several thousand Pak and allied groups out of N. Afghanistan with our cooperation last winter. They relocated them in these training camps in order to support the jihad against India. Well guess what. India has a right to self protection too. Short of nuclear war, I don't think the U.S. really will interfere. Pak cooperation on the frontier with Afghanistan has only been half-hearted and we know it.
3 posted on 05/19/2002 8:09:39 AM PDT by Ranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
Pakistan needs to be cleaned out of these Islamic animals. Why not let India do it, they seem to have the 'fire' for it.
4 posted on 05/19/2002 8:16:02 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring
Well, it's top of the news on Google.
5 posted on 05/19/2002 8:54:42 AM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
The best that could happen as I have quoted in prior clips that it would be better for us to pull out and let them have at it with each and then Back the one who comes out of the Dust afterwards, if their is any Part of the Middle East Left.

In Terms that is easier to understand is that the World would Not have to support <>1.9 Billion two legged A*s Backward Animals anymore...

6 posted on 05/19/2002 9:09:11 AM PDT by Wave Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
Pak reportedly airlifted several thousand Pak and allied groups out of N. Afghanistan with our cooperation last winter.

Thoroughly debunked here many times.

The problem with the hardass Indian position is that it's going to be ultimately unsuccessful, and counterproductive. A conventional war between two countries with nuclear weapons has never been fought, and this isn't the place to see how that will turn out.

A better approach might be to have some confidence-building measures between India and Pakistan. Take Musharraf's pledge to root out terrorists at face value and offer assistance. Put Musharraf to the test.

Instead, India is threatening the Pakistan armed forces and cutting diplomatic ties. If an Indian invasion could solve anything, I'd be for it. But it has the potential to make both sides losers, with only the terrorists coming out ahead. India should not play into their hands.

7 posted on 05/19/2002 9:16:39 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I am not aware of any debunking of the pakistani airlift out of northern afghanistan. If it has, please show it to me.

What is India supposed to do? Last week the families of their army officers were murdered on a bus. In December its parliament was attacked. Pakistan's ISI has been sponsoring surrogate attacks in India for years. I would like to say that Pakistan has the power or will to reign them in but so far there is very little evidence to support that position even if their usefulness to Pakistan has passed on since Pakistan is now being held accountable for their surrogates' actions. Islamic extremists in Pakistan have reasons to inflame the situation and stir up trouble with India. For one thing it is a productive use of time for many hotheads who have been kicked out of Afghanistan. It also keeps Paki troops tied up on the Indian border instaed of chasing terrorists on the Afghan border.

I do agree that this conflict is likely to be much bloodier than either supposes and both overestimate the U.S.'s ability and willingness to influence the other parties. This is probably a good opportunity for the U.N. to take an active role as I think both parties are prepared to support a U.N. negotiated resolution or at least a management of the process.

8 posted on 05/19/2002 10:00:18 AM PDT by Ranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: *southAsia_list
Check the Bump List folders for articles related to and descriptions of the above topic(s) or for other topics of interest.
9 posted on 05/19/2002 10:04:35 AM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone; Ranger
A conventional war between two countries with nuclear weapons has never been fought, and this isn't the place to see how that will turn out.

While strictly true, both the Korean War and the Vietnam War were fought between the US and proxies of the Soviet Union. Conventional war between nuclear powers is possible, so long as it is understood by both to be fought for limited gains with limited means. India and Pakistan have already fought a number of wars whose conclusions did not result in complete victory for one or the other.

10 posted on 05/19/2002 10:11:31 AM PDT by Lessismore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Let loose the dogs of war! Why is it that only the US has the right to retaliate? If INdia does not strike hard, it faces constant 'humiliation' to use a favorite term of the jihadis.
11 posted on 05/19/2002 10:29:18 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
It was called the Kunduz airlift. Presented as a diplomatic demarche by India to the US. It's a fact. Inc exchange for Pakistani 'cooperation', the US allowed the Pakistani Army regulars assigned to the TalibanBrigade55 (remember them) to be airlifted out of Kunduz. Rmember the big battle for Kunduz that never happened. That's because all the Pakistanis got out.
12 posted on 05/19/2002 10:31:51 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Your attitude stinks of appeasement and sacrifices lives of innocent men, women and children on the altar of US 'cooperation' with Pakistan.
13 posted on 05/19/2002 10:33:11 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
I give up. It is impossible to discuss South Asian politics with partisans to the conflict. I don't need the abuse, and the chances of influencing your opinion are zero.

It cracks me up that people are disdainful of whatever the American press says, but lap at the trough of the Hindustan Times, as if that publication isn't biased.

14 posted on 05/19/2002 12:14:42 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
The ‘airlift of evil’
Author: Michael Moran Publication: MSNBC Date: November 29, 2001
URL: http://www.msnbc.com/news/664935.asp
Why did we let Pakistan pull ‘volunteers’ out of Kunduz?

A convoy of several hundred Taliban soldiers evacuate their northern foothold of Kunduz to surrender to opposing Northern Alliance forces earlier this week. NEW YORK, Nov. 29 — The United States took the unprecedented step this week of demanding that foreign airlines provide information on passengers boarding planes for America. Yet in the past week, a half dozen or more Pakistani air force cargo planes landed in the Taliban-held city of Kunduz and evacuated to Pakistan hundreds of non-Afghan soldiers who fought alongside the Taliban and even al-Qaida against the United States. What’s wrong with this picture?

THE PENTAGON, whose satellites and drones are able to detect sleeping guerrillas in subterranean caverns, claims it knows nothing of these flights. When asked about the mysterious airlift at a recent Pentagon briefing, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and Gen. Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, denied knowledge of such flights. Myers backpedaled a bit, saying that, given the severe geography of the country, it might be possible to duck in and out of mountain valleys and conduct such an airlift undetected.

But Rumsfeld intervened. With his talent for being blunt and ambiguous at the same time, he said: “I have received absolutely no information that would verify or validate statements about airplanes moving in or out. I doubt them.”

SEE NO EVIL Western reporters actually in Kunduz in the days after it fell this week found much to dispel that doubt. Reports first appeared in the Indian press, quoting intelligence sources who cited unusual radar contacts and an airlift of Pakistani troops out of the city. Their presence among the “enemy” may shock some readers, but not those who have paid attention to Afghanistan. Pakistan had hundreds of military advisers in Afghanistan before Sept. 11 helping the Taliban fight the Northern Alliance. Hundreds more former soldiers actively joined Taliban regiments, and many Pakistani volunteers were among the non-Afghan legions of al-Qaida.

Last Saturday, The New York Times picked up the scent, quoting Northern Alliance soldiers in a Page 1 story describing a two-day airlift by Pakistani aircraft, complete with witnesses describing groups of armed men awaiting evacuation at the airfield, then still in Taliban hands.

Another report, this in the Times of London, quotes an alliance soldier angrily denouncing the flights, which he reasonably assumed were conducted with America’s blessing.

“We had decided to kill all of them, and we are not happy with America for letting the planes come,” said the soldier, Mahmud Shah.

IN DENIAL

The credibility gap between these reports from the field and the “no comments” from the U.S. administration are large enough to drive a Marine Expeditionary Unit through. Calls by MSNBC.com and NBC News to U.S. military and intelligence officials shed no light on the evacuation reports, though they clearly were a hot topic of conversation. “Oh, you mean ‘Operation Evil Airlift’?” one military source joked. “Look, I can’t confirm anything about those reports. As far as I know, they just aren’t happening.” Three other military and defense sources simply denied any knowledge.

Something is up. It certainly appears to any reasonable observer that aircraft of some kind or another were taking off and landing in Kunduz’s final hours in Taliban hands. Among the many questions that grow out of this reality:

* Was the passenger manifest on these aircraft limited to Pakistani military and intelligence men, or did it include some of the more prominent zealots Pakistan contributed to the ranks of the Taliban and al-Qaida?

* What kind of deal was struck between the United States and Pakistan to allow this?

* What safeguards did the United States demand to ensure the evacuated Pakistanis did not include men who will come back to haunt us?

* What was done with the civilian volunteers once they arrived home in Pakistan? Where they arrested? Debriefed? Taken to safe houses? Or a state banquet?

WHY NOT ADMIT IT The answers remain elusive. If the passengers were simply Pakistani military and intelligence men, and not civilian extremists, what possible motive is there for concealing the truth about their evacuation? Pakistan may believe that no one has noticed the warmth of its intelligence ties to the Taliban and even al-Qaida, but surely the Pentagon isn’t operating under this illusion, is it? This news organization has quoted U.S. intelligence sources as far back as 1997 as saying that ties between Pakistan’s intelligence service and al-Qaida, and links to the Taliban — a movement nurtured by Pakistan — are undeniable.

KunduzAirlift

New Yorker article

Sky News UK

15 posted on 05/19/2002 2:17:04 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring
I wonder why all the news outlets on TV aren't covering the India/Pakistan conflict

True, there is a total ignoring of the region. Foreign news doesn't get much coverage anyway except for Israel, the 6th Borough of New York.

16 posted on 05/19/2002 2:28:39 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
There sure has been. The attack on India's parliament took place the same newsday when the BinLaden 'bootleg' tape of his meeting with the bigwig from Saudi was released. That's what so great about having the net.
17 posted on 05/19/2002 3:01:19 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
Look, I'm not going to argue it with you. The report never made practical sense, and Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld denied it happened.

That settles it for me.

18 posted on 05/19/2002 7:12:29 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I would take the Hindustan Times for truth anyday, over this biased left-wing anti-American, anti-Western, anti-white press we have in the USA! The most important stories, they will not even cover!

For truth, India, and for ideology and a pep rally, ISRAEL! Debka, Ha-aretz, Arutz-sheva all rock!

19 posted on 05/19/2002 7:22:47 PM PDT by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson