Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indian Kashmir camp attacked
BBC ^ | May 19th 11:05 GMT 12:05 UK

Posted on 05/19/2002 4:44:54 AM PDT by maquiladora

Suspected Islamic militants have attacked an army camp in Indian-controlled Kashmir, killing four soldiers and wounding 12 others.

It comes only five days after a major assault on another army camp in Kashmir, which left more than 30 people dead and triggered a new crisis in relations between India and Pakistan.

India accused Pakistani-backed militants of carrying out that attack and ordered the expulsion of the Pakistani High Commissioner in retaliation.

Both countries have massed large numbers of troops along the Line of Control (LOC) in Kashmir, which in recent days has seen renewed heavy shelling.

Pakistan's Information Minister, Nisar Memon, said there were no plans to retaliate on the diplomatic front and Islamabad was hopeful the current crisis could be resolved peacefully.

Indian police said three militants stormed into the camp near Reasi in Udhampur district, some 150 kilometres (90 miles) north of Jammu, throwing grenades and firing indiscriminately.

Three soldiers and one paramilitary policeman died. One of the militants was also killed, but the other two escaped.

Sunday's incident follows a suicide attack on an Indian army camp at Kaluchak in Jammu and Kashmir last Tuesday in which 35 people, including a number of women and children, were killed. In response, India has expelled Pakistan's high commissioner in Delhi, Ashraf Jehangir Qazi, who is to return home later this week.

On Sunday, Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee, who has been facing strong calls in parliament to take action, met opposition leader Sonia Gandhi to discuss the Kashmir crisis.

No details of their discussions were disclosed, but the Congress Party leader has expressed full support for the Pakistani diplomat's expulsion.

Delhi has said the militants who carried out Tuesday's massacre had the backing of Pakistan, and has accused Islamabad of failing to carry out its pledge to clamp down on such groups.

But Pakistan says it has banned extremist Kashmiri groups and rounded up many of their members, alleging that those who carried out the attack in Jammu were indigenous fighters.

Correspondents say that exchanges of fire across the Kashmiri LOC are not rare but, given the current tensions, they have the potential to escalate into a wider conflict.

The two countries have deployed hundreds of thousands of troops along their shared border since a militant attack on the Indian parliament in December.

India withdrew its high commissioner from Pakistan at the time and demanded the extradition of 20 "terrorists" and an end to "cross-border terrorism."

The United States, the country with the most influence in the region, has sent several emissaries to try to lower tensions between the nuclear-armed rivals.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: india; kashmir; pakistan; southasialist; war

1 posted on 05/19/2002 4:44:54 AM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
The Pakis seem to want their own extinction.
2 posted on 05/19/2002 4:45:54 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty
The Pakis seem to want their own extinction.

I'd like that...a lot...

3 posted on 05/19/2002 4:49:01 AM PDT by neutrino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty
Looks to me as if they actually want India to attack them.
4 posted on 05/19/2002 4:53:18 AM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
Well, the Pakis probably have a more effective nuclear force, so perhaps they want the Indians to attack so they can nuke the Indians and distract the Paki people. And get prestige by being the first to use the Islamic Bomb
5 posted on 05/19/2002 5:49:49 AM PDT by CatoRenasci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci
India has at least 80-100 more nukes than Pakistan.
6 posted on 05/19/2002 6:27:12 AM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci
And get prestige by being the first to use the Islamic Bomb...

I wouldn't put it past the demented Islamist minds to perceive this as the ultimate Jehadi accomplishment.

7 posted on 05/19/2002 6:33:41 AM PDT by mikeIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mikeIII
Hmmm...Jehadi...Jedi...???
8 posted on 05/19/2002 8:15:42 AM PDT by Dialup Llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
They are truly crazy jihadis! Musharaff wants to start a war to take attention away from Pakistan's complicity with the jihadists. It put U.S. and Allied Forces in serious danger. Musharaff can no longer be trusted.
9 posted on 05/19/2002 9:00:18 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dialup Llama
They have gone to the Dark Side. Their final destination will be where the sun doesn't shine, and the only light, that of unquenchable fire!
10 posted on 05/19/2002 9:02:24 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: *SouthAsia_list
Check the Bump List folders for articles related to and descriptions of the above topic(s) or for other topics of interest.
11 posted on 05/19/2002 9:51:49 AM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty
A blackhole, maybe?
12 posted on 05/19/2002 10:25:54 AM PDT by mikeIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty
I would disagree with the dangers to US troops who are mainly in Western Pakistan. India's targets would be Islamabad, Lahore, and Karachi. In the East and South of the country. Pakistan wants to go nuclear. It will immeasurably enhance their prestige in the islamic world. BUt even with glowing cities, India has a population of over a billion and Pakistan about 140 million. Calcutta would survive, as would the hitech centers of the South of India.
13 posted on 05/19/2002 10:27:24 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mikeIII
That would be Donna Brazille..
14 posted on 05/20/2002 12:17:28 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
India's targets would be Islamabad, Lahore, and Karachi.

Lahore is only a few miles from Amritsar, (India), site of the Golden Temple

15 posted on 05/20/2002 12:21:10 AM PDT by Nogbad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
Looks to me as if they actually want India to attack them.

Why can't suicide bombers use nuclear weapons too?

16 posted on 05/20/2002 12:23:38 AM PDT by Nogbad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
ping
17 posted on 05/20/2002 12:59:47 AM PDT by Nogbad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nogbad
I mean targets of an tank incursion. Not nuke targets; india's nuclear posture means it will wait for Pakistan to arm or fire its nukes before it retaliates in kind.
18 posted on 05/20/2002 9:05:07 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty
She couldn't find one good thing to say about Reagan on TV once!
19 posted on 05/20/2002 9:06:02 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson