Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
We have always had the right to bear automatic weapons. -- It was infringed by unconstitutional 'regulations'.
6 posted on 05/11/2002 11:03:48 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: tpaine
We still have some right to bear automatic weapons. Federal law permits ownership of fully automatic weapons and silencers if you pay a 200 dollar tax and don't live in one of the 15 states or so that prohibit such ownership. Unfortunately, no new machine guns can be sold to civilians, no thanks to Ronald Reagan who signed the act in 1986 prohibiting transfer of newly manufactured machine guns to civilians.

Suppressors are no problem...in fact, if liberals were as concerned about the health effects of gun ownership as they purport to be, they would make suppressors widely available to cut down on noise, just as is the case in some countries in Europe.

The National Firearms Act was passed in 1938. My understanding is that the meaning of the Second Amendment was quite clear to the Federal government and that Congress recognized it could not ban automatic weapons. So it just put a tax on their ownership which, thankfully, has not been increased since then. Of course, the price of machine guns has skyrocketed since the pool of available weapons is relatively fixed. I say relatively, because every so often a few new machine guns enter the market...Vector Arms in Utah is selling newly manufactured UZI subguns, because they bought several thousand blank pieces of sheet metal which were registered as machine gun receivers before 1986, and they have finished milling them and building new guns.

52 posted on 05/11/2002 8:03:20 PM PDT by Jesse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson