Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pulitzer Committee Snubs Politically Incorrect 'Flag Raising' Photo
NEWSMAX ^ | 4/9/02 | Limbacher

Posted on 04/09/2002 6:04:21 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection

The Pulitzer committee decided yesterday not to award its prize for last year's best spot news photo to the famed photograph of three firefighters raising the American flag at Ground Zero, raising questions about whether the judges were put off by the picture's politically incorrect content.

Instead the committee handed the award to a run-of-the-mill photograph of the collapse of the World Trade Center taken by the New York Times, one of dozens of similarly dramatic but virtually indistinguishable shots of the event.

"The Flag Raising at Ground Zero," as the widely celebrated photo is known, appeared on the front page of most American newspapers the day after the 9/11 attacks and has been compared to the famous Pulitzer Prize winning 1945 photo of the flag raising on Iwo Jima.

Taken by The Record of North Jersey's Thomas Franklin, the photo was instantly heralded as the most inspirational and dramatic depiction of the Sept. 11 attacks, and was cited last month by former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani as the pre-eminent symbol of American resolve and a sign that the U.S. would prevail in the war on terrorism.

But in December "Flag Raising at Ground Zero" became the subject of controversy, when New York City officials decided to commemorate the event with a statue modeled after Franklin's photo in every respect but one - the races three white firefighters would be changed in the name of ethnic diversity.

The racially charged decision went largely ignored until NewsMax.com broke the media's embargo on the development on Jan. 8, after receiving an e-mail from retired New York City firefighter Kevin O'Kane complaining that the plan had prompted of widespread discontent among the FDNY's rank and file. (See: Racial Changes Made in Ground Zero Firefighter Tribute)

The resulting firestorm of public protest forced the FDNY to scrap plans for the politically correct tribute.

The three firefighters, George Johnson, Billy Eisengrein and Dan McWilliams; along with photographer Franklin, were invited to the White House last month after President Bush personally selected "Flag Raising" for a special issue U.S. postage stamp.

Franklin took the Pulitzer snub in stride yesterday, telling the New York Post, "I'm disappointed but what are you going to do."


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: flagraisingreject
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

1 posted on 04/09/2002 6:04:21 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"what are you going to do"?

Ignore the opinions of the Pulizer committee--that's what--just like you do the Academy Awards. Remember when Talk to the Animals was named the best music of the year or something like that? It's the same thing. Consider the source.

3 posted on 04/09/2002 6:13:49 AM PDT by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
If I were the photographer, I'd feel honored by the omission.
4 posted on 04/09/2002 6:15:50 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
What else is to be expected from liberal pressitutes? They need a good bullet in their camera --- I mean the kind that takes politically correct photos. F**k the Pulitzer Committee panel and the camels they came riding in on.
5 posted on 04/09/2002 6:16:05 AM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
The Pulitzer committee decided

Every since I learned that the pulitzer committee, and therefore the pulitzer award, can be manipulated it has been a non-event for me.

6 posted on 04/09/2002 6:16:10 AM PDT by MosesKnows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mortsahl
Yes.
7 posted on 04/09/2002 6:17:07 AM PDT by tal hajus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Last years breaking news winner

seizure of Elian Gonzalez

8 posted on 04/09/2002 6:18:08 AM PDT by alisasny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Seriously, who cares? This just shows what an irrelevant piece of sh!t the Pukelitzer Prize is. Just as irrelevant as the Nobel Peace Prize, which was once awarded to the terrorist Arafart.
9 posted on 04/09/2002 6:19:25 AM PDT by billybudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
This years winner

NY Times photo

BREAKING NEWS PHOTOGRAPHY

The New York Times Staff

This photograph (published September 12, 2001) by Kelly Guenther shows the terrorist attack on New York City as the second airplane approaches the World Trade Center towers on September 11, 2001. The photograph is an example of the work of The New York Times Photo Staff, winner of the 2002 Pulitzer Prize for Breaking News Photography, awarded by Columbia University on the recommendation of the Pulitzer Prize Board.

10 posted on 04/09/2002 6:20:53 AM PDT by alisasny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I don't understand what is politically incorrect about the photo. Could it be that someone is projecting this "politically incorrect" label?
11 posted on 04/09/2002 6:21:28 AM PDT by MissMillie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
The theory on the Pulitzer Prize Committee seems to be this: "When in doubt, give the prize to the New York Times. They're OUR kind of people whi print OUR kind of news."

BFD. By the way, is that plagiarist, Doris Kearns Godwin srill on the Pulitzer Committee? Would seem appropriate, dontcha think?

Congressman Billybob

Click here to fight Shays-Meehan.

Click here for latest: "This Column is About Truth."

12 posted on 04/09/2002 6:25:13 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"...whether the judges were put off by the picture's politically incorrect content. "

How can reality be politically incorrect. Political correctness is blurred reality. That is, it distorts reality by making things different than they really are. Photos can hardly be politically incorrect. Only the warped concepts of the viewer can alter the politics of reality!

16 posted on 04/09/2002 6:31:54 AM PDT by lawdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection;EOD GUY;alamo-girl;amom;Michigander;Jeff Head;Mercuria;Rowdee;AnnaZ;brat...
Now this is it. This takes the cake.I am outraged.The pulitzer committee and the pulitzer prize is now less than a pile of crap of worth.
17 posted on 04/09/2002 6:35:10 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlexanderTheGreat
So what? Breaking news photography? Breaking News of a turd? Post facts of refute instead of bashing Newsmax. If you feel this is inaccurate in any way post your facts.
18 posted on 04/09/2002 6:38:33 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
Ignore the opinions of the Pulizer committee--that's what--just like you do the Academy Awards.

I disagree. The reason political correctness, multiculturalism, affirmative action, etc are foisted upon us, is because we have not spoken out! We need to protest injustices such as this loudly and clearly. Time to call a few talk shows and write to a few newspapers.

19 posted on 04/09/2002 6:42:10 AM PDT by Attillathehon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MissMillie
I don't understand what is politically incorrect about the photo...

It features an American flag and three white firemen. 'Nuff said???

20 posted on 04/09/2002 6:43:01 AM PDT by Morgan's Raider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson