Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We won't give Omar to US: Musharraf
TIMES NEWS NETWORK via The Times of India ^ | March 28 2002 | CHIDANAND RAJGHATTA

Posted on 03/28/2002 1:11:38 PM PST by knighthawk

WASHINGTON: Pakistan's military ruler Pervez Musharraf reportedly told the US ambassador in Islamabad that he would rather hang Sheikh Omar Sayeed, key accused in the Daniel Pearl murder, himself rather than extradite him, one of many instances of backsliding that has called into question Pakistan's credibility as a frontline state in the war against terrorism.

Pakistan's intelligence service has also resumed helping both the al-Qaeda and Taliban forces in the west and Kashmiri insurgents in the east, according to accounts from Afghan and US sources. It has also begun to release hundreds of militants arrested in the aftermath of 9/11 on the mere promise that they will "behave" in the future.

Although the Bush administration continues to certify that Islamabad is being cooperative, its actions – or lack of it – is beginning to raise serious questions in Washington about its intentions.

Musharraf's comment on the danger (to Pakistan) in extraditing Saeed was reportedly made to US Ambassador Wendy Chamberlain, who conveyed it back to Washington, according to Washington Post columnist Jim Hoagland. Behind the refusal to extradite Saeed lie fears that he may expose the deep ties between Pakistani intelligence services and terrorist organisations.

Despite such brazen statements, the Bush administration continues to coddle Pakistan, a policy that is coming in for blistering attack in the US media.

"Washington now allows Musharraf to make expediency the guiding principle of the relationship. The argument that Musharraf's survival, and Pakistan's interests, must take precedence for the time being over hunting down al-Qaeda and halting cross-border terrorism has strong support within Powell's State Department," Hoagland wrote on Thursday.

"But Musharraf is now managing Washington, which has turned its attention to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Iraq and other matters. He has steadily backed away from his January boldness even as Pakistan rakes in hundreds of millions of U.S. dollars in aid. Powell has said nothing as the backsliding has become more flagrant and more harmful to Bush's global cause," he said.

US officials continue to maintain that Pakistan is doing everything it is asked too, while avoiding throwing any light on the tussle between the two sides over Saeed's extradition.

The two sides have also differed sharply over the US decision to recall all American diplomatic personnel, except those dealing with emergency services, following the bomb attack on a church in Islamabad resulting in the death of a US diplomat and her daughter.

More than 200 US nationals have returned to Washington over the past week, leaving behind a skeletal staff to man basic operations. Dozens of diplomatic personnel are now having to be accommodated in newly created positions in the state department.

Pakistan itself has now become an avoidable posting for most state department mandarins. The latest recall is the fourth in the last decade and the second within six months. US personnel were first recalled from Pakistan in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, but were sent back in January when the situation appeared to improve.

The Pearl murder and the church bombing showed otherwise and they were pulled out again last week. The frequent movement has thrown the lives of many diplomats out of gear.

However, the US move has not been well received by Pakistan, which sees the exit as playing into the hands of terrorists. The pull-out is also certain to hurt Pakistan's economy since US investors and businesses will be reluctant to go where they lack diplomatic support.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: danielpearl; musharraf; omar; pakistan; southasialist; terrorwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 03/28/2002 1:11:38 PM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: golitely; rebdov; Nix 2; viadexter; green lantern; BeOSUser; itsahoot; Brad's Gramma; Barset...
Ping (and watch me getting flamed for posting from Indian sources!)
2 posted on 03/28/2002 1:12:41 PM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Hang his sorry ass then ... but let's get on with it.
3 posted on 03/28/2002 1:14:10 PM PST by mgc1122
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
You got India on one side and Afghanistan on the other both saying that Pakistan's 'contribution' to regional stability is not welcome. At some point, this has to sink in and the Pakis will need to figure out something constructive to do.
4 posted on 03/28/2002 1:15:28 PM PST by Dialup Llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dialup Llama
I think somehow Musharraf wants to, but he is facing a lot of people who are against that. But everytime you think he is serious tackling the radicals, there is something that points the other way.
5 posted on 03/28/2002 1:17:43 PM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
poor musharraf...
6 posted on 03/28/2002 1:34:01 PM PST by krodriguesdc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
If they hang him, and document it indisputably, I'll be satisfied.
7 posted on 03/28/2002 1:39:11 PM PST by ihatemyalarmclock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: knighthawk
Just do it!! But make sure we have a rep. to witness!! Can't trust these folks.
9 posted on 03/28/2002 1:43:58 PM PST by whadizit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Just do it!! But make sure we have a rep. to witness!! Can't trust these folks.
10 posted on 03/28/2002 1:45:21 PM PST by whadizit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *TerrorWar;*SouthAsia_list
Check the Bump List folders for articles related to and descriptions of the above topic(s) or for other topics of interest.
11 posted on 03/28/2002 1:49:08 PM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Pakistan's military ruler Pervez Musharraf reportedly told the US ambassador in Islamabad that he would rather hang Sheikh Omar Sayeed, key accused in the Daniel Pearl murder, himself rather than extradite him, one of many instances of backsliding that has called into question Pakistan's credibility as a frontline state in the war against terrorism.

This is backsliding? Hanging sounds perfect - It's gotta be more painful than the lethal injection he'd get here - And a lot more certain outcome, too.

12 posted on 03/28/2002 1:49:10 PM PST by LouD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
I have absolutely NO problem with Pakistan hanging him. It makes no difference whether he's tried here or there as long as he ends up dead.
13 posted on 03/28/2002 1:53:24 PM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Ping (and watch me getting flamed for posting from Indian sources!)

From the Washington Post

Pakistan: Pretense of an Ally

By Jim Hoagland Thursday, March 28, 2002; Page A29

Why the delay? One possible reason is that Saeed did not turn himself in but was contacting the intelligence service as part of a longstanding relationship similar to the one Pakistani intelligence had established with the Taliban, Osama bin Laden and the Kashmiri terror groups that Musharraf promises to shut down. Something triggered an arrest and a week-long pause in deciding what to do with Saeed.

The intelligence service is a house of horrors waiting to break open. Saeed has tales to tell. And that may explain a comment from Musharraf that U.S. Ambassador Wendy Chamberlin reported back to Washington: "I'd rather hang him myself" than extradite Saeed, the Pakistani president reportedly said in their conversation.


14 posted on 03/28/2002 1:53:31 PM PST by milestogo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LouD
It is backsliding because they will not hang him! They will eventually let him go along with all his other associates at the ISI (Paki CIA).

India will finish this job for us, Thank God. See this thread.

15 posted on 03/28/2002 2:00:42 PM PST by BullDog108
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: milestogo
Thanks!
16 posted on 03/28/2002 2:04:24 PM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
I object to hanging. His head should be sawed off, just like Danny Pearl's. And then it should be fed to the pigs.
17 posted on 03/28/2002 2:12:20 PM PST by tomahawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
This is a "so what?" article.

For weeks on FR I posted that Omar and his key associates would be tried in an anti-terrorism court that has the death penalty, and no appeal. Meanwhile, others were saying that he would walk.

Omar is now in that anti-terrorism court. Trial starts tomorrow. Figure 10 days or less for the trial and 48 hours after that for the hanging. If the US wants Omar's body at that point, they can ask. Most likely the US will announce that it is "satisfied."

Looks like my estimate of about 20 hangings was a bit high. 11 looks to be the number, with upwards of 250 arrests and jail time for the small fry. Unless the round-up today in Pakistan adds to the candidates for the rope.

Congressman Billybob

Click here to fight Shays-Meehan.

Click for latest column: "Does Anybody READ the Constitution?"

18 posted on 03/28/2002 3:01:35 PM PST by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
I hope you are right. In the US a trail would be very long and he might still walk free. If he is hanged for his crime, or he is hanged by Musharraf himself, the result is the same.
19 posted on 03/28/2002 3:07:05 PM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
If they hang his sorry ass, I don't mind. After all, the murder took place in Pakistan, Pakistan has the death penalty, etc.

Extraditing him to the U.S. would just stir up the loonies that have been recently been quiet in the aftermath of the ass-kicking they took in Afghanistan.

Musharraf has to balance things carefully. If he cracks down too hard on the militants, he risks provoking the rogue elements of Pakistani intelligence into either taking him all the way out or supporting a coup. If he is too lenient, they get over-confident and try anyhow.

20 posted on 03/28/2002 3:25:46 PM PST by Ronin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson