Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PURER POLITICS (Constitution guaranteeing freedom of speech had to be sacrificed)
rushlimbaugh ^ | 3/22/2002 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 03/24/2002 11:10:34 AM PST by TLBSHOW

PURER POLITICS

Did you notice anything special yesterday? Of course you did! The air was finally cleared and American politicians enjoyed their first full day of purity. We can blame, er thank, Senators John McCain, Russ Feingold, Representatives Chris Shays and Marty Meehan, and Enron's Ken Lay by the way, for liberating our fearless politicians from their own base instincts. The campaign finance bill wouldn't have passed without them.

At long last, money has been eliminated from the political process. Big money, special interest money and at the root of all evil, soft money is finally outlawed. And now that the money has been taken out of politics, so has corruption. Politicians will no longer be forced to corrupt themselves, to be influenced by donors because there will be no more donors! We finally have controlling legal authority in Washington D.C.

Of course, with the good comes the bad. In this case, the First Amendment to the Constitution guaranteeing freedom of speech written specifically to protect political speech had to be sacrificed. Ah, who cares - the ends justified the means. In the end we have a system that provides incumbents job security. As for the special interests, those pesky little citizens or groups used to have a right to petition their government, ah, they were a pain in the neck anyway. Good riddance - sayonara.

As of yesterday, American politics is now pure as the wind-driven snow. And our brave political warriors are now elevated to sainthood having won the good fight against us, we the people, and our money. Oh, happy day.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: constitution; speech

1 posted on 03/24/2002 11:10:34 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
as usual rush says it best
2 posted on 03/24/2002 11:18:44 AM PST by jtmckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jtmckee
Unlike some here that could care less.
3 posted on 03/24/2002 11:19:48 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
our brave political warriors are now elevated to sainthood having won the good fight against us, we the people, and our money. Oh, happy day.
We-the-people are to be fobidden to criticize our betters on a paid ad, but journalists are to be free as birds to say what they want for pay. That is only right, because journalists are objective. We know they are objective, because that's just what they tell us.

Logical.

- - - - - - -

The origins of the present contretemps trace back to the start of mass marketing in the 1830s, when mass production of newspapers made it necessary to position your newspaper as being "objective" rather than trying to market only to people who agreed with your editorials. But journalism was limited to newsprint, and was unambiguously "the press". Part of it, of course--magazines and books are printed, too . . .

But the real subversion of the First Amendment occured with the institution of broadcasting. Wireless communication is a technology created by we-the-people, but broadcasting was created by the FCC when it granted exclusive high-power transmitting rights to the few and censored transmitting by the many. What was merely cute when radio was in the "early adopter" phase has, now that TV is the undisputed center of political discourse, produced a constitutional morass.

Broadcast journalism is not the free press but de facto an arm of the government--and broadcast political advertisements are effective but hugely expensive. Broadcasting is the entire reason "campaign finance reform" has any political appeal at all. Eliminating politics from broadcasting is not just acceptable but very desirable, even necessary. But journalism is politics--and we need not hold our breath waiting for that to be admitted by journalists.

Why Broadcast Journalism is Unnecessary and Illegitimate

4 posted on 03/24/2002 12:46:13 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Radio FR AND Rush would not be effected by this. The constitution and free speech will.
5 posted on 03/24/2002 12:51:33 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Get the jerks who reformed the First Amendment Bump!
6 posted on 03/24/2002 12:54:24 PM PST by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW;all
Silence, America!:

Silence, America!: for Silence, America!. 

Other Bump Lists at: Free Republic Bump List Register



Here's a Note to Activists:

Want to do something? Go here:

Ignorance Making You Ill? Cure It!

for links, tools, & instructions about how to contact a pile of different people, and how to send a link to this story right here ( or anywhere else ) to a "mass email" using Outlook Express.



7 posted on 03/24/2002 12:58:45 PM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
bump
8 posted on 03/24/2002 1:20:12 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson