Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WOULD CONDI RICE AND COLIN POWELL BE "PRO-CHOICE" ON SLAVERY?
Issues & Strategy Bulletin ^ | February 28, 2001 | Howard Phillips

Posted on 03/23/2002 4:54:02 PM PST by Diago

Excerpted from Howard Phillips Issues & Strategy Bulletin of February 28, 2001

WOULD CONDI RICE AND COLIN POWELL BE "PRO-CHOICE" ON SLAVERY?

"Condoleeza Rice, Bush's much-expected pick as national security adviser, has described herself as ‘reluctantly pro-choice.’

" ‘What if I described myself as reluctantly pro-slavery?’ [Douglas] Scott [President of Life Decisions International] retorted. ‘I mean, we are all reluctant to make hard choices.’ ...



TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: condi; powell; proabort; rice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
Pro-lifers need to start organizing now against a possible bait and switch with the vice-presidency. Ridge, Rice and Powell are all being kicked around as possbile VP's. They would then become front runners for the Presidency dealing a severe blow to the pro-life movement and certainly leading to even more millions being killed.
1 posted on 03/23/2002 4:54:02 PM PST by Diago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pollwatcher; 3catsanadog; mdittmar; verboten; braD’S GRAMMA; IM2PHAT4U; LARRYLIED; CAGEY...
I noticed that not a few people on this forum were beginning to deny that Rice was a pro-abort. This was the only documentation I could find. Perhaps I'll e-mail howard Phillips for documentation on this rather bizzarre "reluctantly pro-choice" quote of Rice to for documentation on its origin.

I am always amazed at how quickly otherwise sound Conservatives will waive all their standards and engage in affirmative action when it comes to black RINO's. White guilt is alive and well in the GOP.

2 posted on 03/23/2002 5:04:43 PM PST by Diago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diago
Pro-lifers need to start organizing now against a possible bait and switch with the vice-presidency. Ridge, Rice and Powell are all being kicked around as possbile VP's.

Can someone point me to a reasonable source indicating one of these three are being considered as VEEP material in '04? Please?

3 posted on 03/23/2002 5:07:25 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diago
If Condi Rice is indeed "reluctantly" pro-abortion, I am "reluctantly" anti-Condi Rice for Veep.
4 posted on 03/23/2002 5:16:02 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Diago
As National Security Advisor Condi Rice's position on abortion isn't important. But as Vice President she would be a heart beat away from supporting further pro-choice measures, that would lead to more deaths of unborn children. There's been 40,000,000 abortion deaths since 1973, we don't need someone who supports abortion rights to become the next VPOTUS. Not now, not ever! I don't believe Colin POwell wants to be VPOTUS. I believe Tom Ridge wants to be POTUS some day and a good stepping stone is to be a VPOTUS first. I don't believe Bush would pick Ridge or Rice to replace Cheney. If he did, he would lose significant conservative support.
5 posted on 03/23/2002 5:29:27 PM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diago
Bump

Let's pray for Condi Rice's eyes to be opened to the truth about the holocaust of abortion -- and Colin Powell's too.

6 posted on 03/23/2002 5:30:34 PM PST by father_elijah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Diago
WOULD CONDI RICE AND COLIN POWELL BE "PRO-CHOICE" ON SLAVERY?

If they support income taxes, they support my being enslaved for about 7 months of the year. That includes state, local, federal, and user fees (parks, licenses, etc.) that most won't count as taxes... anyway...

7 posted on 03/23/2002 5:50:00 PM PST by thatsnotnice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
It isn't just the job a person is in. Being pro-choice reveals that a person is EVIL. And evil people do not belong in ANY position of authority or power.
8 posted on 03/23/2002 6:04:43 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
It isn't just the job a person is in. Being pro-choice reveals that a person is EVIL. And evil people do not belong in ANY position of authority or power.

Exactly!

9 posted on 03/23/2002 6:08:40 PM PST by Diago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: father_elijah
Condoleeza Rice received her Masters degree in political science from Notre Dame in 1975. She spoke there in 1995 when she was awarded an honorary doctorate and described herself as pro-life.
10 posted on 03/23/2002 6:12:34 PM PST by Cato the Censor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Diago
Great to see that people are reading the I&SB!
11 posted on 03/23/2002 6:12:50 PM PST by Scholastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
Bravo! Precisely the point!
12 posted on 03/23/2002 6:28:05 PM PST by father_elijah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Diago
This seems really important at this point in history! </sarcasm off>

Condi Rice is the NSA, how or where abortion plays into this is beyond me!

Her job is to help determine whose ass we should kick with what means and when.

13 posted on 03/23/2002 6:29:25 PM PST by TD911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cato the Censor
I pray she has not changed her position or waffled. She needds to make her position plain.
14 posted on 03/23/2002 6:29:37 PM PST by father_elijah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Diago
Would you care to give me your opinion on the job Rudy Guiliani did as Mayor of New York. Before, during, and afer September 11, 2001?
15 posted on 03/23/2002 6:32:24 PM PST by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cato the Censor
Well, she's changed her mind. She probably realized that being pro-life, or saying that one is pro-life, is a liability.
16 posted on 03/23/2002 6:57:51 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Diago; Cato the Censor; father_elijah
From a 1999 National Review article:


17 posted on 03/23/2002 7:45:47 PM PST by Artist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Diago
It's already bad enough with Bush approving fetal stem cell research the way he did ----too many "compromises" and we're seeing no progress at all.
18 posted on 03/23/2002 7:50:12 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: TD911
This seems really important at this point in history! </sarcasm off>

40 million babies have been killed by abortion since Roe v Wade. So, actually, it is somewhat important.

20 posted on 03/24/2002 5:09:35 AM PST by Diago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson