Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawsuit claims Iraq behind OKC bombing
The Dallas Morning News ^ | 03/15/2002 | By BYRON HARRIS / WFAA-TV News

Posted on 03/18/2002 2:54:42 AM PST by SharpEye

Lawsuit claims Iraq behind OKC bombing

For more than six years, the federal government has maintained that Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols acted alone in bombing the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City.

But now, a lawsuit charges that agents of Iraq in whole or in part 'orchestrated, assisted and aided' in the plot to blow up the building.

Officially, McVeigh and Nichols are held responsible. But an Oklahoma City lawyer alleges that a master terrorist workng for Iraq was behind the bombing. His name is Ramzi Youssef.

"They planned to send him out on a campaign of international terror," attorney Michael Johnston said.

There is no doubt Ramzi Youssef is a master bomber. He was convicted for his involvement in the first bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993. He also blew up a 747 in the Philippines in 1995, killing one man.

Youssef is now serving 240 years in prison. His sidekick, Abdul Murad, is also serving a prison sentence. On the day of the Oklahoma City bombing, Murad claimed responsiblity, saying the Liberation Army had done it. An FBI report shows he made the statement to an FBI agent.

Former CIA official Vince Cannistraro received a warning about the attack, the FBI report shows. Cannistraro got a call from a Saudi counter-terrorism expert before the bombing, who said there was a squad of people currently in the United States, very possibly Iraqis, who had been tasked with carrying out terrorist acts aginst the country. First on the list was the federal building in Oklahoma City.

The connection between Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols, Ramzi Youssef and Abdul Murad is the Phillippines. Nichols had a Phillipine wife. He traveled there often. And there, lawyer Michael Johnston says, under the instruction of Ramzi Youssef, Nichols learned to make a bomb like Youssef had made in New York.

"They were both large fertilizer bombs," Johnston said. "They were both delivered to the scene by Ryder trucks that were rented in adjoining states. And, they were both positioned in such a way to bring down the buildings that were the targets of the attack."

Terry Nichols' passport records, obtained by News 8, show he was in the Philippines at the same time as Youssef. Another report, from a high-ranking Philippine official, notes that in 1996, Philippine officials thought Terry Nichols was a Pakistani, Arab, or U.S. National.

The suit was filed by the conservative Washington-based legal group Judicial Watch. It has filed a number of lawsuits alleging wrongdoing in the Clinton and Bush administrations. One of the goals of the lawsuit is to obtain evidence that's been under seal in Federal Court in Denver, Colo. Another goal of the suit is compensation: the victims are asking for $1.4 billion in punitive damages from the Republic of Iraq.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nichols; okcbombing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: mewzilla
Sorry, missed the EST. It's late.
41 posted on 03/18/2002 10:59:12 PM PST by glorygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: thinden
"this guy sounds like the 2nd coming of....NDCORUP, no?"

Never did like that guy.

42 posted on 03/19/2002 3:32:42 AM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84
OKCBomb, Ruby Ridge, Flt. 800 have become clarion calls. It would go better for them to have the truth come out now and MAYBE they would have time to repent. If I were them, I would choose justice now rather than later!
43 posted on 03/19/2002 6:15:18 AM PST by mancini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: thinden
this guy sounds like the 2nd coming of....NDCORUP, no?

Now that you mention it, he does! We're doomed!

44 posted on 03/19/2002 6:17:11 AM PST by mancini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SharpEye
bump
45 posted on 03/19/2002 6:22:26 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
Just got home during the last couple of minutes of Johnson'a appearance, but I taped the program. I'll post the main points after dinner. They've got a name and pic of the Iraqi guy ID'ed as John Doe #2. Anyone know if Gibson's program is aired again later tonight?
46 posted on 03/19/2002 1:40:20 PM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
According to Johnson there's security tape footage of this Iraqi guy with Tim McVeigh. I'll go back after dinner and get what Johnson said and post it verbatim. The bit I saw was incredible.
47 posted on 03/19/2002 1:42:10 PM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz, rdavis84, OKCSubmariner, glorygirl, VOA, thinden
Okay, here are the highlights. First some backround on Larry Johnson, who is a former CIA officer and Dep. Dir. of the State Dept.'s Office of Counterterrorism.

Johnson said this info comes from a local reporter named Jana Davis (sp?). She found numerous people who had seen John Doe #2, who was id'ed as Hussain Hashem Al-Hussani, a forner Iraqi Gulf War soldier, who was paroled into the US after the Gulf War. (Wish I had the capability of downloading this guy's pic off the telecast. Hussani looks exactly like the artist's sketch.)

Anyway, Davis found at least 23 witnesses who have put Hussani with McVeigh.

2 people id'ed Hussani and McVeigh in a bar Apr. 15.

3 people id Hussani running from in front of the Murrah Building at 5:30 am that morning, as if he were practicing timing something.

2 witnesses put Hussani with McVeigh in the Ryder truck (I didn't catch when).

1 witness in the Murrah Building id's Hussani getting out of the Ryder truck.

Other individuals as well as Hussani have been id'ed (I took that to mean Iraqis).

There is also a videotape of Hussani getting out of a vehicle (don't know if Johnson meant the Ryder truck) at the Murrah Building.

The Feds have had all this info. They still haven't given the info to the defense teams (not that they'd want it, but the public sure as Hades would).

One other bit of info: the individual that Hussani worked for is linked to a brown pick-up truck that had an APB put out on it the day of the bombing. This particular individual was also seen at a Las Vegas topless club that McVeigh and Nichols frequented.

48 posted on 03/19/2002 2:41:31 PM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Ping.

I want to know two things in particular: Who gave the feebs the order not to pursue this info (according to Johnson the Feds have had it and something called the 302's since Jan. 29, 1999)? And why were those orders given?

If you want my suspicion, FWIW, Bubba didn't want to go after Saddam (blackmail?), and the right-wing militia movement made a very useful bogeyman.

49 posted on 03/19/2002 2:55:21 PM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Destructor
"Waco Junkie- Anyone who cannot accept the fact that it is over with regard to finding the truth about the Branch Davidian Massacre. Anyone who cannot accept the fact that this atrocity has been swept under the rug, and nothing will effect the final outcome. "

Optics expert rebuts Waco standoff report

It ain't over yet; may Kathrine Andrade rest in peace.

50 posted on 03/19/2002 3:06:37 PM PST by Tymesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
I think the real reason was the Clinton use of the "right wing bogey man" to boost his standing and to discredit the right, especially "talk radio." Clinton milked that show for everything he could get.

So if the story started to come out that it was really Iraq, what a mess Clinton would have been in. He would not only have to really do something, like punish Saddam for this bombing, but he would have had to retract and apologize for the statements he made. As his popularity went up significantly, he chose the path of least resistance, told Janet Reno to fix it and here we are.

51 posted on 03/19/2002 3:07:56 PM PST by schu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Yes, I recall the demonization of Militia groups about that time.... I believe talk radio was being smeared as Hate Radio, as well. There is a lot hidden about OKC- whether we'll ever get to the bottom of it remains to be seen. But I do believe more will leak out in the fullness of time.
52 posted on 03/19/2002 3:17:08 PM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: schu
sorry for the long post, but can anyone answer these questions?
1. If the bombing of the Alfred E. Murrah Federal building in Oklahoma City was a terrorist reprisal for the Federal massacre of the Branch Davidians at Waco, why were no BATF or FBI agents injured? Why was EVERY BADGE-CARRYING FEDERAL AGENT absent from work at nine o'clock on a weekday morning, their offices staffed only with civilian clerical workers?

2. When the word first got out that no Federal agents had been present in the building, the BATF produced its Resident Agent Alex McCauley who told a long story about his own heroism and that of a fellow ATF man who allegedly fell three floors in an elevator, walked away from it, and then helped rescue others trapped by the bomb. This was quickly exposed as a fabrication in an angry interview by building maintenance supervisor Duane James, who described McCauley's story as "pure fantasy". James examined the elevator in question and also the central control panel and pointed out a number of technical and logical reasons why the miraculous elevator incident simply couldn't have happened in the way claimed. The McCauley account was quietly retracted and flushed down the memory hole by the ATF, with the help of the media. They now admit that McCauley was nowhere near the building when the bomb went off, although they refuse to discuss his exact whereabouts or the whereabouts of any other ATF agent at the time of the explosion.

Will BATF Agent Alex McCauley be disciplined for telling a self-serving lie which falsely made himself out to be a hero? If that was not the purpose, why did he make this palpably false public statement?
3. Why was U.S. Judge Wayne Alley, whose office was located in the Federal building, warned several weeks in advance in a Justice Department memo to be prepared for an unnamed "terrorist act" directed against the Federal building?
4. Judge Alley made the above admission to the Portland Oregonian immediately after the bombing. He has since refused to repeat it or allow himself to be interviewed again. Why?
5. Why did Ken Stern fax warnings to Federal judges and officials, legislators, and prosecutors warning of a possible attack on a government building of installation on the second anniversary of Waco on April 10th, 1995, nine days before the OKC bombing?
6. "Norma," a witness who worked in an office building just down the street from the Federal building, told reporter Sherry Koonce what she saw prior to the explosion: "The day was fine, everything was normal when I arrived for work at about 7:45 a.m. There was some talk about the bomb squad among the employees at our office. We wondered what it was doing in our parking lot. Around nine I heard and felt a huge explosion. Then someone said it had to be a bomb, and we all knew. I remembered the bomb squad in our parking lot and knew what had happened."
"Norma" has since quit her job, gone into hiding and refused to speak again to any reporters or investigators. So have a number of other people who saw the heavily armed and equipped bomb squad in the area up to three hours before the blast. Why?
7. Why did all mention of the facts outlined in questions 1 thru 6 disappeared from the news media after the first week of coverage of the bombing? Why has the media consistently suppressed and refused to report any information or evidence which indicates that, at the very least and regardless of who was responsible, there was Federal foreknowledge that the bombing would take place?
8. By definition, a terrorist must take credit for his violence, or else there is no compelling reason to commit a crime. The specific purpose of terrorism is to gain a political end through the credible threat to commit future acts of violence. No one has claimed credit for the Oklahoma City bombing. Militia and right-wing groups, the alleged masterminds and presumed beneficiaries, have been particularly vehement in denouncing the explosion and in many cases have cooperated directly with Federal agencies to absolve themselves of any involvement. The only statement of alleged political motive comes from the very government which was attacked. Why is this?
9. Did the Alfred Murrah building warehouse documents relating to the attack on the Branch Davidians at Waco? If so, what happened to those documents? Were they destroyed? If so, were any copies kept elsewhere? If not, why not?
10. Will the missing papers, if any, affect former Attorney General Ramsey Clark's lawsuit against the ATF and FBI on behalf of the Branch Davidian survivors?
11. Why did the Director of the University of Oklahoma's Geological Survey, Dr. Charles Mankin, tell the media that according to two different seismographic records there were TWO blasts, the second approximately eight seconds after the first?
12. The news media initially reported that there were two explosions, based on eyewitness testimony. Why did this version of events disappear from print and the air waves within twenty-four hours?
13. According to the prosecution, McVeigh used an ANFO (Ammonium Nitrate and Fuel Oil) bomb to destroy the Alfred P. Murrah federal building. McGyver makes it look real easy on TV. But according to Department of the Army and Air Force Technical Manual No. 9-1910, entitled Military Explosives, ANFO requires a greater than 99% purity of ammonium nitrate, as well as a specific dryness, before it can be mixed with diesel fuel to create an explosive substance. The manual further spells out that even under ideal conditions (not often reached even by experts) 4,800 pounds of ANFO explosive would create a much smaller crater than the one left in front of the Murrah building, and its shock wave could not possibly wield the force necessary to compromise the building's concrete support structure. The FBI claims that the ANFO charge was made from 50 bags of fertilizer. Ammonium nitrate fertilizers comes in much weaker concentrations than the 99%-plus required for explosives. Creating concentrated amounts of ammonium nitrate is quite complex, and would require many bags of fertilizer. In short, according to the government's own textbook, the Oklahoma City bombing COULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED IN THE WAY THE FBI SAYS IT HAPPENED. IT IS A PHYSICAL, CHEMICAL, AND THERMODYNAMIC IMPOSSIBILITY. Why is the FBI lying?


14. Retired Air Force Brigadier General Benton K. Partin, former commander of the Air Force Armament Technology Laboratory, a 25-year expert in the design and development of bombs, urged Senators and Congressmen to delay the destruction of the Murrah building site. Partin stated in a news release, "When I first saw the picture of the truck bomb's asymmetrical damage to the Federal building in Oklahoma, my immediate reaction was that the pattern of damage would have been technically impossible without supplementary demolition charges at some of the reinforced concrete bases inside the building, a standard demolition technique." Partin further explained that "reinforced concrete targets in large buildings are hard targets to blast. I know of no way possible to reproduce the apparent building damage through simply a truck bomb effort." General Partin's request to have the bomb site preserved in order to examine the possibility of a second explosion was ignored by the government. Why?
15. General Partin's press release, quoted above, was reprinted in the John Birch Society magazine New American. Based on this the news media launched an egregious and bogus smear campaign against General Benton K. Partin, claiming falsely that he was a member of the John Birch Society and therefore a "right-wing extremist". [General Partin's report has been widely circulated and reproduced, including an electronic version here on ParaScope.] General Partin has been forced repeatedly to threaten lawsuits in order to obtain grudging and deliberately downplayed retractions and corrections of this allegation. His alleged JBS membership still appears in print and broadcast media today as fact, even though the media are by now perfectly well aware that the allegation is false. Why are the news media telling a deliberate lie in order to discredit a highly respected expert who questions the official government version of Oklahoma City?
16. There have been repeated studies done by a variety of accredited explosives experts and professional demolition contractors, such as former FBI agent Ted Gunderson. All of these have stated their professional opinion that the destruction of the Murrah building could only have been accomplished with top-grade military explosives, detonators, and careful placement of multiple charges. Why have the media ignored these expert opinions? Why, indeed, have the media engaged in a concerted campaign to abuse, vilify, discredit and marginalize as a "crank" or a "right-wing extremist" any explosives expert or engineer who questions the official FBI version of the bomb's construction and explosive power?
17. There is not a single piece of concrete evidence to connect either Timothy McVeigh or Terry Nichols to any militia or right-wing group. Why has the news media refused to acknowledge this fact and continued to spread the patently false assertion that McVeigh was a member of a militia group?
18. Terry Nichols has been married twice, once to a Mexican woman and once to a Filipina. Obviously, a man who marries women of color not once but twice and has children with them can hardly be called a racist. Why has this fact, which clearly precludes any racist or neo-Nazi involvement in the bombing of the kind implied by the media, not been given any significant exposure at all? And why has the media ignored connections between the Oklahoma City bombing and the very real, very racist Elohim City compound in Arkansas, not to mention Andreas Strassmeir, grandson of one of the founders of the Nazi party in Germany?
19. Having allegedly just committed a coldly calculated, carefully and meticulously planned mass murder, why did Timothy McVeigh then suddenly turn into a Clouseau-like klutz and do everything but send up a flare to draw attention to himself? Why did he go speeding out of the state at almost 100 mph in a yellow car with no license plate, virtually guaranteeing that he would be stopped?
20. Timothy McVeigh is a highly trained combat NCO who won a Bronze Star for courage under fire in the Gulf. Having been stopped by a state trooper, being armed with a pistol, and knowing that he now faced either execution or imprisonment for the rest of his natural life, why did McVeigh make no move at all to defend himself or escape, instead surrendering like a little lamb?
21. FBI agents are said to have tracked down McVeigh's truck rental agency by finding a vehicle identification number (VIN) on the truck's rear axle. This axle was found either in the bomb crater, according to the mayor of Oklahoma City's initial press statement, or three blocks away according to the later FBI version. Which statement is true?
22. There is another problem to the Ryder truck tale. No rear axle on any vehicle manufactured in America is imprinted with a VIN, even after recent legislation forcing manufacturers to place multiple VINS on the engine, firewall, and frame to discourage chop shops. When queried, a spokesman for Ryder told reporters than it does not imprint additional VINS on its trucks. The only conceivable number available on a rear axle is a part number, but a part number couldn't lead to the identification of a specific vehicle. We have here another case where the FBI version of events simply COULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED in the way the Bureau claims it happened. Where did the VIN story come from? Why has it been created and circulated by the media?
23. Did McVeigh use fake I.D. or his real I.D. to rent the truck? The FBI has relayed both stories as being true.
24. The FBI detained and interrogated Timothy McVeigh's young sister Jennifer and Terry Nichols' twelve year-old son. They announced in the media that both of them were suspects and that Jennifer McVeigh was facing indictment and the death penalty. These charges later vanished, and both young people were released. While undergoing harsh FBI interrogation, Jennifer McVeigh was exposed to projections of shocking, graphic images of bombing victims. What is the story here?
25. Who is John Doe Number Two? Does he exist at all? The FBI first conducted a nationwide manhunt for JD-2 over a period of several weeks. Then they claimed that a U.S. Army soldier on leave, whose published photographs bear no resemblance whatsoever to the photofits, was JD-2. Then they claimed for some months that JD-2 does not exist, and that all the witnesses who saw him were mistaken. Now they are hedging again and say they have an "open mind" about whether John Doe Number Two exists. What's the deal?
26. In January of 1996, National Public Radio broadcast a half-hour special containing interviews with half a dozen witnesses who personally saw John Doe Number Two in the Ryder truck with Timothy McVeigh on the morning of the bombing. These witnesses all had one thing in common; other than a cursory preliminary interview by the FBI they had up until that time been approached by neither the prosecution nor the defense to appear as witnesses at the trial. Why not? Will any witnesses who saw John Doe Number Two be called to testify?
27. In the summer of 1995 a mysterious American named Daniel Spiegelman was arrested in the Netherlands for trafficking in stolen diamonds and antiques. In July of 1995 the Janet Reno Justice Department quietly applied for Spiegelman's extradition to the United States IN CONNECTION WITH THE OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING. This was accompanied by representations at the highest level demanding that the Netherlands courts hear the case in camera and that the proceedings be kept completely secret. Through his attorney Spiegelman fought extradition, a Dutch judge refused to impose secrecy on the hearing, the media got hold of it, and Janet Reno allegedly withdrew the extradition request, whereupon the entire bizarre episode vanished from public view. No more media blackout in the OKC case has been more pervasive than the blackout imposed over the name of Daniel Spiegelman; it is as if he has stepped off the face of the planet. Who is Daniel Spiegelman? What connection does he have with Oklahoma City? Is he John Doe Number Two? Does he know who John Doe Number Two is?

28. FBI informant and star witness Michael Fortier, who admits to trading his testimony for lenient sentencing on gun charges himself, claims that he and Timothy McVeigh scouted out the Murrah building several weeks in advance looking for the BATF offices therein. If that is true, why did Timothy McVeigh stop the Ryder truck at a gas station on the morning of the bombing and ask directions to the building? And why did he park the truck on the side of the building the farthest away from the BATF offices, when there was an available parking lot which would have placed the truck bomb almost directly under the seventh-floor windows of the BATF?
29. Why was the reaction of the Clinton administration, blaming right-wing radio talk shows for the incident and demanding the most draconian police state legislation ever proposed in the United States, so swift and obviously organized? The air of orchestration about the entire government response did not escape notice even at the time, and was commented on by a number of observers across the political spectrum. A blizzard of OKC-inspired "domestic terrorism" bills were rushed into Congress in a matter of days, some of them pre-written and already printed up BEFORE THE BOMBING. These proposed laws cover everything from banning virtually all privately owned firearms to unlimited and court-admissible Federal wiretaps to censorship of the Internet to the suspension of habeas corpus in "terrorism" cases to the grotesque destruction of the First Amendment advocated in Charles Schumer's bill H.R. 2580, which imposes a five-year prison sentence for publicly engaging in "unseemly speculation" and publishing or transmitting by wire or electronic means "baseless conspiracy theories regarding the Federal government of the United States". Who decides what is a "baseless conspiracy theory'? Why, the very same government, of course. How was a normally cumbersome, inefficient, and glacially slow legislative branch able to move so quickly, so comprehensively, and so efficiently in introducing these laws which will strip Americans of what remaining freedoms they have?
30. Why did it take so unconscionably long for the trial of Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols to begin?
53 posted on 03/19/2002 3:19:25 PM PST by BronzePencil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: BronzePencil
Uh, I guess I don't have answers to all these questions......

The bottom line is there is enough doubt that a full investigation is warranted. Unfortunately, the investigative body, if done by the government, will have no credibility. The questions are all valid, it seems to me.

The most compelling argument in my mind is the damage, however. I just don't see how the level of technology they used could casue that type of destruction, but of course I am no expert.

54 posted on 03/19/2002 3:47:57 PM PST by schu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: schu
i promise i'm not wearing tin foil and i agree with you that a full investigation is warranted
55 posted on 03/19/2002 3:51:42 PM PST by BronzePencil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: BronzePencil
Go to this link for a start at getting answers to 'your' questions:

30 Crucial OKC Bombing Questions Remain Unanswered [FREE REPUBLIC]

Ignore _Jim on that thread; he's a government lackey.

56 posted on 03/19/2002 6:22:41 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla; mancini; AtticusX; BlueDogDemo; Judge Parker; archy
Thanks much for posting the relevant information from Larry Johnson's appearance on Fox's The Big Story today.
57 posted on 03/19/2002 6:25:30 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
thanks for the info - a lot to absorb
58 posted on 03/20/2002 6:19:36 AM PST by BronzePencil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla,Fred Mertz,Uncle Bill,golitely,ratcat,rdavis84,thinden,aristeides,Marianne,backhoe,Plummz
Thanks very much for your reporting on the details of what was said by former CIA counter terror official Larry Johnson on Fox "The Big Show"

Did Johnson say whether anyone else in the US government (Pentagon,CIA, etc)believed what he said and if they were going to do anything?

Did he say what he was going to do with his information?

Did he discuss presenting his info to COngressional hearings especially since Johnson testified before COngress after 9/11? Did Johnson say he would go discuss this info about Iraq with Admiral Woolsey or Paul Wolfowitz at the Pentagon?

59 posted on 03/20/2002 5:45:03 PM PST by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
The answer to all of your questions is "no," except in reference to the lawsuit we already know about.Gibson spent a lot of time asking him whether he thought all this John Doe #2 stuff was legit.

BTW, Tomorrow (today) Thursday, March 21, on Fox & Friends, Frank Keating is going to discuss the lawsuit sometime between 6 a.m. and 9 a.m. EST, if anyone is up late enough or early enough to read this and tune in.

Here is what the Fox website says:

"Do the 14 survivors and victims' relatives of the Oklahoma City bombing have a case against Iraq? We'll ask Oklahoma Governor Frank Keating."

60 posted on 03/20/2002 8:34:31 PM PST by glorygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson