Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Estrogen may not lift mood, energy levels
Chicago Sun-Times ^ | Feb. 6, 2002 | JIM RITTER

Posted on 02/06/2002 5:28:20 AM PST by Flipper4

A study published today is raising new doubts about hormone- replacement therapy for post-menopausal women.

The study found that most women taking estrogen experienced a decline in such quality-of-life measures as energy and the ability to do everyday activities. Only those women who were experiencing menopausal hot flashes, which are relieved by estrogen, reported an improved quality of life.

The new research "should challenge the widely held belief that hormone therapy helps women remain more youthful, active or vibrant," said an editorial that accompanied a report of the study in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Other recent studies found estrogen does not protect against heart attacks or Alzheimer's disease.

"Estrogen has been disappointing, and the more we find out, the more disappointing it gets," said Dr. Marie Veldman of Advocate Christ Hospital's Women's Health Center in Oak Lawn.

Natural estrogen levels in women decline at menopause. As a result, 50 percent to 80 percent of women suffer from problems including hot flashes, night sweats, vaginal dryness and insomnia. Studies have shown that estrogen therapy relieves these menopausal symptoms, but there has been controversy over other potential benefits of the widely prescribed treatment. An estimated 38 percent of U.S. women between 50 and 74 are on hormone replacement.

The new research involved 2,763 postmenopausal women randomly assigned to receive either Prempro--a pill containing estrogen and progestin--or a placebo. The women were followed for three years and surveyed on four quality-of-life measures. Wyeth-Ayerst, which makes Prempro, funded the study. Among women who had hot flashes at the start of the study, those given hormones had less depression and overall better mental health than those on the placebo. Among women who didn't have hot flashes, hormone users reported less energy and less capacity for everyday activities, including household tasks and sexual relations.

"The most likely explanation is that when you don't have any [menopausal] symptoms, it's hard to make you feel better," said the study's lead author, Dr. Mark Hlatky of Stanford University's medical school.

The study has limitations. The average age of participants was 67, and all had heart disease, so the findings don't necessarily apply to younger women with no heart disease. And the results might not apply to women who take estrogen without progestin.

Hormone therapy improves cholesterol levels. Early studies showed it also reduced the risk of heart disease. But these studies might have been flawed because participants who took hormones exercised more and were thinner and less likely to have diabetes than women in the studies who didn't take hormones.

A recent study compared heart patients who took hormones with women who took a placebo. The result: Hormone therapy did not prevent further heart attacks or death. Similarly, other recent studies have contradicted earlier research showing that estrogen reduces the risk of Alzheimer's disease.

Hormone therapy increases bone density, which can reduce the risk of fractures from osteoporosis. But there are other ways to do that, too, including exercise, calcium and vitamin D supplements, and taking drugs such as Evista and Fosamax. Long-term estrogen use increases the risk of endometrial cancer, but that risk could be eliminated by combining estrogen with progestin. Using either estrogen alone or both hormones for more than five years might increase the risk of breast cancer. Estrogen also increases the risk of blood clots and gallstones.

Recent studies might cause a slow shift away from hormone therapy, said Amy Allina of the National Women's Health Network. "More and more questions are being raised about the volume of hormone-replacement therapy, and what the risks are," Allina said.

But some experts advise the 11 million hormone users not to throw away their pills. "We have not seen the total answer," said Dr. David Archer, an obstetrician- gynecologist at Eastern Virginia Medical School. "I believe there are benefits that can accrue from estrogen."

Dee Obirek, 59, of Oak Lawn isn't giving up on estrogen. The hormone has dramatically relieved her hot flashes, insomnia, anxiety and depression. She hopes it will protect her from heart disease and osteoporosis.

"I've made my decision, and I'm sticking with it," she said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
This is important information for lots of women.
1 posted on 02/06/2002 5:28:20 AM PST by Flipper4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Flipper4
Thanks for the post. There is such conflicting information out there that it's difficult to make an accurate assessment.
2 posted on 02/06/2002 5:40:05 AM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flipper4
Vaginal dryness can be relieved by suppositories or creams. It's not necessary to subject the entire body to hormones for such a local effect.

Depression is common in middle-aged women. We are busier even than when we have babies - getting kids through high school or settled in college; taking care of elderly parents or relatives; supporting our husbands through various midlife crises, career changes, etc. We have a lot of things to worry about, as do our husbands, and that leads to a lot of anxiety in some women. Taking estrogen isn't going to solve these problems either.

3 posted on 02/06/2002 5:40:11 AM PST by ikanakattara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flipper4
The study has limitations. The average age of participants was 67, and all had heart disease, so the findings don't necessarily apply to younger women with no heart disease. And the results might not apply to women who take estrogen without progestin.

That paragraph above is what should be the key point in this article. Shoddy reporting makes people more confused.

4 posted on 02/06/2002 5:43:42 AM PST by technochick99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flipper4
HRT has been devastating to my body. Caused me to have an enlarged uterus, enlarged liver, and a fibroid tumor. I am still suffering from taking hormones for just three (3) months.
5 posted on 02/06/2002 5:44:38 AM PST by Lex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lex
I find that natural methods can and do work just great for me!

I get Vitamin E and a good multiple at the health food store. They also have a good progesterone cream that you dab on an arm, or your chest or whatever you are comfortable with. I used to really suffer with the symptoms mentioned, but I feel great now! I am 67, and had to try several different things since my 50's.

g

6 posted on 02/06/2002 6:01:35 AM PST by Geezerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Geezerette
Oh, the progesterone cream is non-prescription and made from natural sources. It can be had from a health food store near you!

g

7 posted on 02/06/2002 6:05:24 AM PST by Geezerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Flipper4
This reinforces my decision not to explore HRT. I walk 3 miles at noon nearly every day, which lifts my mood if I'm glum. In fact, I get the most benefit on those days when I have to force myself to put on my walking shoes.

I also pray while walking those 3 miles. So, if you have prayer requests, let me know and I'll add you to the list. If I have to increase my prayer walk, I will!

8 posted on 02/06/2002 6:14:46 AM PST by mombonn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lex
Lex, I'm sending you a "private reply"
9 posted on 02/06/2002 6:16:10 AM PST by Shannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Flipper4
I wonder what women did before HRT? Last time I checked women have been around for a long time and doing quite well.

As a student of medicine I've often found it annoying how some in the profession often wants to use one "blanket" therapy for everyone with a certain problem/disease/disorder. Medicine needs to be assessed on a case by case basis. Giving HRT to every woman post-menopaus is not only lazy its irresponsible.

10 posted on 02/06/2002 6:22:11 AM PST by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Thorn11cav
There are obviously cases where people need hormone therapy. It's just not for everyone. I'm glad to hear that the hormone has been helping you. I think MANY men over the age of 40-45 could benefit from some sort of hormone therapy. However, hormones are VERY tricky to play with, so you have to play it slow. The hormones should help your arm heal quicker too.

And anyone who says God has no sense of humor, does not know God :-)

12 posted on 02/06/2002 6:49:47 AM PST by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Flipper4
Hormone replacement therapy is VERY IMPORTANT for the following reasons: (My spouse is an OB/Gyn and has been perscribing hormone replacement for 30 years.) First of all, reread the article. What they were talking about was synthetic hormones. That is a no no. Let me start by saying this - we are as healthy as our hormones are when they are at their most productive. Our hormones are at the highest levels in our late teens to early twenties, so as a general rule that is when we are the healthiest. It is CRITICAL to stay at that level. All our hormones begin their gradual decent (leading us to imcreasingly poor health) in our thirties. There are exceptions to the rule and some people have great genetics and don't slide as rapidly. So, what a man and a woman needs to do is this: (as my spouse does it in his practice for both the male and female ) is #(1) check ALL hormone levels. #(2) replace only those that need replacing #(3) replace using only natural hormones. #(4) replace back to the levels of when you were in your late teens to early twenties for the most optimal health.
13 posted on 02/06/2002 6:52:25 AM PST by Jane G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thorn11cav
In 10 years or less it will be considered malpractice not to check men for male menopause. In my spouse's practice he starts checking men in their 30s for male menapause. You want a man's testosterone levels back to his early 20s. That would be the range of 1100-1200. In Europe they are getting men, who have a history of heart disease and diabetes, back to the range of 2300 as that is the levels they had at aprox. 17 year old. This frequently is stopping the heart disease and diabetes and reversing it. Not 100% though. My spouse is distrustful of the above mentioned numbers as those numbers are skewed, so a better baromator is how the patient feels! We use to perscribe the cream form of test. for the male but could never get the lab values up there in high enough range. The shots given every 10 days and long enough duration to get the levels up there. Then they are recomending switching over to pellets to maintain that level. (pellets under the skin and last 6-9 months.)
14 posted on 02/06/2002 7:05:34 AM PST by Jane G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: Thorn11cav
High school and college football did a number on my left shoulder. I'll probably have to have it scoped one day too, but for now it doesn't bother me too bad.
16 posted on 02/06/2002 8:09:21 AM PST by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Geezerette, Jane G
I had early hyster and took estrogen for 20 years. Also, have always eaten very good diet including tons of vitamin supplements. Off estrogen for 2 years now, and I really feel the lack. That cream does a bit of good, but my mood sinks and I don't feel as mentally sharp as when on estrogen. I'm going back for more.

JaneG, what kind of doctor should I see about hormone tests? A doctor here has anti-aging clinic and weekly radio show touting hormone replacement -- not just estrogen -- for staying young and vibrant. I believe he charges more than I can pay, but like his ideas....any suggestions?

17 posted on 02/06/2002 8:29:48 AM PST by PoisedWoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: Thorn11cav
I'll find one of the orthopedic guys here at school and see what he thinks. Maybe I do need surgery.
19 posted on 02/06/2002 8:36:13 AM PST by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: realpatriot71
They died. And still do. Early. Needlessly. And we're not even mentioning quality of life! Doc
20 posted on 02/06/2002 9:53:09 AM PST by Jane G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson