STUDY: "'GAY' SUBSET COMMITS MULTIPLE REPEATED CHILD SEX OFFENSES"

3 to 4.5 boys victimized per homosexual male while 1 girl is victimized per 11 heterosexual males

CRESTWOOD, KY, November 14, 2001 (LSN.ca) - An important research paper by Dr. Judith Reisman, demonstrates with statistics from the 1992 US Statistical Abstracts that the 'gay' population contains a vast subset which "commits multiple, repeated child sex offenses."

Dr. Reisman is the famous psychologist who discovered that the main body of research which led to the sexual revolution was fraudulent. In her seminal work on the father of modern sexology, Alfred Kinsey, Reisman showed that Kinsey paid pedophiles to sexually experiment with children as young as 2 years of age. Kinsey later used that "data" to give impetus to pedophilia by claiming that children are sexual from birth.

Reisman cites the 1992 Statistical Abstract of the United States saying that 6 to 8 million boys are sexually victimized by members of the approximately 2 million-strong gay community in the US (2% of the adult male population in the US). Comparatively, the statistics indicate that 9% of the heterosexual adult male population of approximately 87 million are responsible for the victimization of 8 million girls. Thus the ratio shows 3 to 4.5 boys are victimized per homosexual male while 1 girl is victimized per 11 heterosexual males. Reisman concludes that since not all homosexuals males sexually assault boys, a "'gay' subset commits multiple, repeated child sex offenses," each with an average number of victims above 4.

Reisman's full report "Crafting Gay Children" can be found at: http://rsvpamerica.org/crafting%20august%202001.htm#_edn93

Well, doggone it. I was getting ready to post a response to L_Candide, and was really going to enjoy it. Then, when I bring the post back up, you've already bombed him. Nice, work, although you do have to admit, it's kind of like shooting fish in a barrel.

Oh, well, since I've already logged on, I'll go ahead and bomb the article a little.

First of all, one of the primary sources of the article is Avedon Carol, who runs the "Feminists Against Censorship" website, here. Among other things, they recommend the elimination of ALL pornography laws. Since they are British based, they specifically call for "abolition of the Obscene Publications Acts, the Video Recordings Act, and the Clubs and Vice Squad (formerly the Obscene Publications Squad and, separately, the Club Squad)". They also recommend "positive and accurate sex education for young people, starting as early as possible," This is code for access to school children. Anybody else here on Freep remember the Massachusetts debacle? If you don't, the link is here.

Okay, let's look at a quote, from Dr. Loretta Haroian, another "scource" for the article.

A society that encourages sexual competency rather than constraint and in which every man, woman and child can say “yes” or “no” to sex without prejudice or coercion. To encourage children to be sexual in a sexually repressive or permissive/ambivalent culture is to exploit their healthy sexual interest, as they will be left alone to deal with a double standard and the sex-negative, self-serving attitudes of peers and adults.

You can find her entire article on child sexual development here.

Now, let's go to the article itself. The article goes from stating that Alfred Regnery claimed it was a mistake to publish the article, although it gives no source for the statement. It then goes directly to a quote from Ms. Avedon, in which a professor from the University of Pennsylvania makes negative statements about the study. Although there is an implication that Dr. Reisman considers Romeo and Juliet to be pornographic, no quote is given to support this, other than a quote from a professor listed in Ms. Avedon's book. Of course, the entire section is designed to make the quotes of one professor through Ms. Avedon to be attributed to Mr. Regnery. The actual quote attributed to the professor is 'I wondered what kind of mind would consider the love scene from Romeo and Juliet to be child porn' My suspicion is that someone said, "Why you could apply these standards to Romeo and Juliet. What kind of mind would consider the love scene from Romeo and Juliet to be child pornography." If she actually made the claim, why didn't the author quote the part of the study where she made this claim?

The entire article can be torn apart in such a manner, but why bother? Just remember that the primary sources for the article are people that want to eliminate all pornography laws, and have full access to children, in order to help them "explore their sexuality." After that, there's not much left to wonder about.

Sadly L_Candide is the antithesis of his/her/its name. He/she/it is not the least bit candid about his/her/its wild biases - and actually pretends his sources are anything but leftish to the nth degreee.

Some people like him/her/it likely were molested as their introduction into their homosexual life choices and want to pretend that it was actually a positive event - when obviously any sexual activity between adult and child is 100% the fault of the adult and evil to the core. Even if someone like him/her/it thinks they enjoyed being molested, that was not something they should have experienced and messed up what sexuality is all about - a man and a woman uniting in God's love to express their unity and co-create with God thereby. How sad that for people like him/her/it sexuality becomes a choice that is primarily about personal happiness (how selfish) - and in reality was never a choice at all because any choices were skewed due to being abused.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.