Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Ten Lost Tribes: The Case for Afghanistan, Kashmir, and Pakistan
Moshiach.com ^ | current | moshiach.com

Posted on 09/24/2001 8:53:22 AM PDT by xzins

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: xzins
You have freepmail! Yes, it's a small world. Call me or freepmail me again so I don't forget (you will understand after you see my message).
21 posted on 09/24/2001 12:03:56 PM PDT by JeepInMazar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Lowell
They did God's will by abandoning Solamen the Wise and eventually converting to the worship of evil?
22 posted on 09/24/2001 12:05:04 PM PDT by Stavka2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Styria
I wish I knew the answer to your question. Benjamin, as you correctly state, was more associated with the regions around Jerusalem and eventually was associated with the Southern rather than the northern kingdom. The northern kingdom comprised the 10 lost tribes.

I remember something, though, to do with the politics of the time that had to do with Jeroboam's questioning of Rehoboam's legitimacy to rule the entire 12 tribes.

23 posted on 09/24/2001 12:08:18 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lowell
Reply from my friend Wally) This is of the mark. I know they say they are of Abraham, Ishmul and Jacob (Isreal). But, if they are of Abraham, they would know Christ who came not to the "lost" ten tribes, but to the lost three tribes in the land of Isreal. The ten tribes were not deported but departed from under the son of Soloman to avoid the consequences of the continued policies of Soloman, they did God's will, as they are doing today. Interesting but untrue!

Lowell, could you paraphrase all this and expand on it. I'm not following it, and I'd like to give you an honest answer.

24 posted on 09/24/2001 12:14:18 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JeepInMazar, xzins
Talk about a Divine Appointment! The LORD is bringing His People together!
25 posted on 09/24/2001 2:04:30 PM PDT by TrueBeliever9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TrueBeliever9
That's truly amazing isn't it? I've not heard from MY FRIEND in years. We SERVED together, same boss, same interests, same bellyaching, etc.!!!
26 posted on 09/24/2001 2:16:07 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I've heard also that the Pathans keep the Mosaic law of cities of sanctuary. Have you run across that assertion in any of the reading you've done?
27 posted on 09/24/2001 3:11:52 PM PDT by Twodees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Israel was forcefully marched to the northern reached of the Assyrian empire around 800BC. Around that time two groups rose up in that area, which split into what are often termed Aryans and Scythians. At some point they began to scatter, some toward India and China, some toward Europe. It is believed that the Euro group eventually became the Celts. They also kept remnants of Jewish culture, for example not eating pork. There have been archaeological finds along the migrating paths that show evidence that this was indeed the lost tribes. It doesn't suprise me that there would be some remnants in Afghanistan and surrounding areas. What it means I don't know, other than it does fulfill the Abrahamic covenant that his descendents would be like sand on the seashore.
28 posted on 09/24/2001 3:20:31 PM PDT by Free Vulcan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twodees
If it's in the paper I read, I've forgotten it. As soon as I get another copy, I'll let you know.
29 posted on 09/24/2001 3:22:07 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan
do you have some source locations for your info. I'm keeping track of this stuff. Thanks.
30 posted on 09/24/2001 3:23:02 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan
What it means I don't know, other than it does fulfill the Abrahamic covenant that his descendents would be like sand on the seashore.

I'm wondering if somehow it ultimately means/leads to the evangelization of the Afghans? Of course, if it's wrong, then it means nothing at all.

31 posted on 09/24/2001 3:27:49 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Thanks. That was one thing that really interested me.
32 posted on 09/24/2001 3:53:37 PM PDT by Twodees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan
it does fulfill the Abrahamic covenant that his descendents would be like sand on the seashore.

Actually, mathematically it doesn't.

The promise may mathematically only be kept if mankind seeds to the stars and multiplies through the galaxy--an awesome implication of God's promise to Abraham.

33 posted on 10/22/2001 11:30:32 PM PDT by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: StoneColdGOP;xzins
#9: Me too! Thanks for the lead;link.
34 posted on 12/17/2001 7:01:49 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Sheesh, the Pathans have similar traditions to Jews because they are Muslim, who have 'borrowed' most Jewish tradition (Kosher = Muslim Halal, circumsicion, not eating pork etc. etc.) Besides, North-western India (parts now in Afghanistan and Pakistan) have fallen under quite a few wandering tribes, from Greeks to Scyths to Huns to Mongols to Turkic groups, so they are a mix. The Bene-Israeli are found in the South of India in Kerala where many Jews fled after the destruction of the second temple in 70 A.D. and where they were welcomed by the King.
35 posted on 12/03/2003 6:13:32 PM PST by Cronos (W2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Styria
Benjamin isn't one of the ten lost tribes

Exactly, that's why I think the article is bogus. The Shah of Afghanistan is a comparatively young dynasty -- only aroudn 300 years old, but they would claim descent from the Prophet muhammed.
36 posted on 12/03/2003 6:15:43 PM PST by Cronos (W2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: xzins
What exactly was the "birthright" that Esau sold for a bowl of "red" porridge to Jacob?

What exactly was the "blessing" that Isaac gave to Jacob instead of Esau?

Who is modern "ESAU"? He is still to be a player so why does no one speak of him?

Reading those two things might give insight as to the travels of the House of Israel. Most know where the House of Judah with Benjamin went after taken captive to Babylon.
37 posted on 12/03/2003 6:23:21 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts; Cronos
You need to reread the caution at the beginning:

What follows is initial evidence that links some people groups in Afghanistan, Kashmir, and Israel. It is thought provoking. HOWEVER, IN POSTING THIS, LET ME ENCOURAGE THE INTERESTED TO GO TO THE WEBSITE AND READ "OVERVIEW" IN WHICH THE CASE AGAINST THE TEN LOST TRIBES IS PRESENTED. Also, note that the "people of the book" as Mohammed called them (Christians or Jews), who converted to Islam, were considered by him to be totally Moslem and totally acceptable. The two sections below deal with Afghanistan and Kashmir.

38 posted on 12/03/2003 6:46:24 PM PST by xzins (Proud to be Army!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Regardless of the caveat given, if what is put forth as possible possibilities of who, what, when, and where goes against what is WRITTEN then it is a dead end.

Seems one major piece of the puzzle of who and where the "Ten Tribes" are, is the "WHY" they are LOST. Remembering the reason they got "LOST" so they don't know who they are keeps them "LOST".

39 posted on 12/03/2003 8:21:22 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
Exactly. I don't believe that the Assyrians would deport people but keep them together in 'tribes'. This would have been dangerous to them -- disgruntled people far from their homeland, ith nothing to lose AND in a large group would be dangerous, so they split them up. Most would have intermarried and disappered into the local populations (they did have a penchant for doing so as demonstrated in Kings I&II) while other diverse, small groups would move far. But they would be small. Many, when Judah was restored would return
40 posted on 12/04/2003 2:06:58 AM PST by Cronos (W2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson