The backstory is a sad tale.
Readers are extremely confident that all the key facts are in the story. They have no hesitation in assuming the conclusion the writer wants the reader to make is the correct one. They can’t even conceive they could be wrong in their assumption, that any important facts could be missing.
This is life in our modern world.
What backstory could there be that would justify this nutjob yanking the uber driver out of his car and pointing a weapon to his face?
Readers read the facts, which read for themselves.
The guy driving was also someone’s son.. and a licensed UBER driver.
We don’t get to point an AR15 in the face of some working stiff doing his job, because we’re too stupid for words.
🥳 Shoe-Foot exchange:
Without proof this WAS the Father, and “Baby” was safe, should the driver pull out his AR 15 and stick it in Daddy’s face??