To: ChicagoConservative27
Yes, but nobody should be using the term “pup” in reference to an aggressive animal that killed livestock. That's not a puppy, but a large and dangerous animal.
To: Missouri gal
Except that the “livestock” were apparently just chickens. More backpedaling on her part.
To: Missouri gal
I thought it was also 14 months old.
In any event people have a right to control animals and to control livestock especially in farm areas.
15 posted on
05/02/2024 7:12:44 AM PDT by
Williams
(Stop Tolerating The Intolerant)
To: Missouri gal
There's livestock and then there's livestock.
Did Cricket kills some chickens or did he/she kill some cattle?
45 posted on
05/02/2024 7:22:08 AM PDT by
RoosterRedux
(A person who seeks the truth with a closed mind will never find it. He will only confirm his bias.)
To: Missouri gal
but nobody should be using the term “pup” in reference to an aggressive animal that killed livestockOh please. How do you know she's telling the truth? Every time she talks about it, she embellishes her story about how the dog was "dangerous." She's trying to dig herself out of a public relations mess and it isn't working.
152 posted on
05/02/2024 9:06:01 AM PDT by
Avalon Memories
(Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats. -- P.J. O’Rourke)
To: Missouri gal
The livestock could be chicks for all we know.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson