p
Maybe they have DEI degrees and used AI to build their cases?
Is their legal theory that when a politician pays hush money he has to announce it so as not to commit election fraud?
In a just world, with an impartial judge, yes. In Merchan’s court, no. BUT always remember, the heart of the king is in the hand of the Lord, and He turns it whichever way he desires. Pray to the Lord that He will exonerate Trump.
Time to throw fat Alvin’s butt in Jail. Damn crook.
Actually, the proper motion is for a judgement on the evidence at the close of the prosecution’s case. Not really a motion to dismiss. Although a motion to dismiss could be a vehicle just to put the issue in the judge’s mind and create a record.
Eh, the “crime” is misbooking an expense as an expense, when it (supposedly) should have been a campaign expense. This is wrong, as this was just an expense, not a campaign expense so it was booked correctly, but the distinction the author is trying to make is incorrect.
He’s close, though.
DA Bragg, who received big Soros campaign donations...
None of this matters.
They really couldn’t care less about the merits or legality of their case.
It’s all about one thing and one thing only.
Crippling Trump in any way possible.
This may be true but how did the prosecution not reveal this months prior to the trial? Don’t they need to present it in the indictment?
Reminder to the writer: Kangaroo courts don’t often find people “not guilty”.
These “takes” on how Bragg made some error are a joke... they make it sound like this were a serious case that could be muffed through bad prosecution. The case is a joke and it just shows what can happen if you have a judge who just doesn’t care. They want Trump to become “convicted felon” Donald Trump, that is all... because that title will remain until after the election given how long the appellate process takes. Only the jury stands in the way of a conviction now.
Yeah but will Trump’s lawyers file a motion to dismiss..this would seal the deal and get it dismissed under NORMAL circumstances because this “case” should never have been filed to begin with
Trump will either be acquitted or get a hung jury, at most guilty of a misdemeanor. But regardless he will appeal and win on appeal easily based on dozens are reasons.
The author seems to think that facts and law have some relevance. They don’t. This is a show trial designed to force Trump to sit in a NY courtoom for weeks while democrats throw crap allegations against him hoping that something sticks.
If the all-democrat jury finds Trump guilty (which most or all of them already decided to do before they were evenpicked for the jury) and the democrat hack judge throws Trump in jail (which democrats everywhere are begging him to do), it will be a bonus.
“Bragg and Colangelo . . . maintain that Trump, Cohen, and Pecker conspired to get Trump elected to President of the United States.”
That is actually the crime being prosecuted, regardless of the tenor of the formal charges.
Were Trump not a threat to become president again, there would be no criminal cases and no civil cases. Pure and unadulterated election interference.
But is it a federal election? Looks to me like it's a state election, to determine which slate of Electors the State of New York will send to the Electoral College. Those people vote in a federal election.
“Bragg and Colangelo . . . maintain that Trump, Cohen, and Pecker conspired to get Trump elected to President of the United States.”
Does this premise mean, that all the mainstream media should be targeted for “Not” reporting or burying stories on all other political candidates? Sheesh!
Mr. Gambini, that was a well thought out, lucid argument, MOTION DENIED!