Posted on 04/18/2024 9:28:36 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
If the House GOP loses its majority next year, it might well be because Speaker Mike Johnson sold out Republican voters by failing to fund border security while working with Democrats to funnel billions more taxpayer dollars to Ukraine — after he repeatedly said he wouldn’t do precisely that.
Of course, it won’t take much to lose the Republican majority, which will narrow to 217-213 once Rep. Mike Gallagher, R-Wis., retires later this month. (Gallagher, whose last day was set for Friday, has said he’ll delay his retirement to help ensure Johnson’s Ukraine funding passes this weekend.)
November is not that far off, and between President Joe Biden’s fragile health and declining mental capacity, and Donald Trump’s legal (lawfare) troubles, the presidential election is very much up in the air. It won’t take much, in one direction or the other, to tip the balance of power in the House.
But the truth is, Johnson and Republican House leaders will deserve to lose their slim majority if they go through with their plan to enact the Biden administration’s agenda and send billions to Ukraine and Israel while refusing to do anything about the ongoing border crisis.
Whatever happens next, by any measure Johnson’s tenure as speaker has been an abject failure, a profile in spinelessness. Under his speakership, the Republican House majority has already dwindled by five (when Johnson was elected speaker, he had a 222-213 majority, nine seats) and will soon dwindle by one more. This shrinking majority is made worse by his and his lieutenants’ feckless leadership and unwillingness to play hardball with Democrats and establishment Republicans. After all, what good is even a slim Republican majority if you’re going to ignore what your voters want and work instead to pass Biden’s priorities?
And make no mistake, this is exactly what Johnson has done. Five months ago, he sent a sternly worded letter to the Biden White House explaining that “supplemental Ukraine funding is dependent upon enactment of transformative change to our nation’s border security laws,” and that before more tax dollars were thrown at the Ukraine conflict, the Biden administration needed to answer questions about our objectives, establish accountability for what we’ve already sent there, and define what a victory and “sustainable peace” will look like.
After that, Johnson more or less did nothing, and none of what he demanded came to pass. And yet Johnson is now working very hard to give Biden and the Democrats everything they wanted while getting zero in return — and still nothing has been done about the border. (Less than nothing, actually. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and his Democrats this week disposed of impeachment articles without a trial for Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, whom the House voted to impeach over the border fiasco. Senate Dems, who enjoy an even slimmer majority in their chamber, made it clear there will be no accountability for the Biden administration over the border.)
At one time, not long ago, Johnson talked a big game about the border. It seemed like he cared about it. As my colleague Jordan Boyd noted Wednesday, back in May 2023, before he was speaker, Johnson opposed sending more aid to Ukraine until Congress addressed mounting problems here at home. The U.S., he said, “should not be sending another $40 billion abroad when our own border is in chaos, American mothers are struggling to find baby formula, gas prices are at record highs, and American families are struggling to make ends meet, without sufficient oversight over where the money will go.”
Once he became speaker, Johnson softened his tone on funding foreign wars but still maintained that addressing America’s problems should come first. Even as recently as November, he said additional funding for Ukraine should coincide with “changing our own border policy.” In December he called the border crisis his “top priority,” and in January he actually went and visited the border at Eagle Pass, Texas, a hotspot for mass illegal crossings.
So much for all that. The border no longer appears to be his top priority or really much of a priority at all. It ranks below funding for Ukraine, Israel, and the Indo-Pacific, which are all set to get funding in an aid package — along with billions for Gaza, which is to say Hamas — that Johnson and other GOP House leaders are working with Democrats to pass over the objections of much of the Republican conference and the vast majority of Republican voters.
And they’re not even trying to make cogent or compelling arguments for what they’re doing. Speaking on Wednesday to CNN’s Jake Tapper (whose viewers, it seems, are Johnson’s actual constituency), Johnson repeated the Democrat and neocon talking point that unless we keep shoveling money into a grinding war of attrition in Ukraine, Putin will march through Europe. I’m not kidding. He said: “We are going to stand for freedom and make sure that Vladimir Putin doesn’t march through Europe.”
The Putin-will-march-through-Europe line was preposterous when it was trotted out over two years ago; today it’s indefensible, a worn-out neocon talking point that no one, not even those robotically repeating it like Johnson is now, really believes. Moscow, which has yet to secure even the areas of eastern Ukraine it claims to have annexed, has no ability to threaten Europe militarily. And even if it did, Russia has a unique strategic interest in Ukraine it does not have in Poland or other NATO member countries, let alone the whole of Europe.
But Johnson isn’t going to let facts on the ground get in the way of his tired establishment narrative — or better yet, Democrat narrative. As Will Chamberlain put it Wednesday on X, “We effectively replaced Kevin McCarthy with Chuck Schumer as speaker of the house.”
The obvious reality is that Speaker Johnson is a pathetic tool of the Washington uniparty, and the sooner he loses his gavel, the better off the country will be — even if it means Democrats regain a House majority. I’d rather have a coherent and unified opposition party than a complicit, compliant, and totally compromised GOP majority under Johnson. Especially if impeaching Biden is off the table, as it clearly is, then what exactly is the point of continuing to do business this way?
So yes, if Republicans lose their House majority in November, it’s Johnson’s fault. And in the long run, he’ll be doing us all a favor.
I’m one of the few here who isn’t inclined to be too hard on Johnson. He’s a legislative leader, not an executive. How do you “play hardball” with two factions who collectively comprise at least 80% of the House members?
Can someone tell me how a Republican house HAS HELPED a SINGLE conservative?? Right back at you!!!
It will be Matt Gaetz’s fault for creating the problem to begin with.“
BS, Kevin the Cuck had to go. This awful bill would have already passed if Kevin was speaker.Put the Blame on the 19 rino’s who voted against Jordon that is where it belongs.
RE: The Republicans need to elect a Speaker with some ballz - Marjorie Taylor Green!!!
OK, let’s see what she’d do as speaker regarding the budget.
GOP is just a glorified NJ crew to the NYC mafia. From whom they take orders. At this point the country is better off with the Gambino crime family in charge.
Traitor Mike Johnson is compromised and dedicated to Joe Biden and destroying traditional America.
Blackmail Op ….. again! It’s rather obvious.
If the GOP loses the majority, I think it’s by plan.
Funny how the corrupt traitors mirror Fox News.
Fox News ignores the Debt aspect of funding Ukraine. They don’t talk about who’s going to be saddled with that Debt and how it’ll affect our economy.
If Trump held up four fingers and told people it was five, some here would actually SEE five fingers.
Not that I don’t want Trump to win, but I’m under no illusions that he isn’t just another politician promulgating whatever will fire up the crowds and get himself elected.
Too late! And I don’t believe it will be Johnson’s fault. It will be the GOP’s fault. The cowardly, feckless, spineless trash in the GOP will be the reason they lose the House & Senate. Trump is the only candidate getting my vote this year. The rest can kiss my tail.
He’s in a very difficult spot, but, he made a pledge, repeatedly, to not bring a Ukraine bill forward that did not include US border wall funding.
This is 100x worse than what McCarthy supposedly did, which was to not let Gaerz read some bill 48 hours in advance. It was actually the LAST bill we’ve seen that actually CUT government spending, but was abandoned thereafter.
“It will be Matt Gaetz’s fault for creating the problem to begin with.”
At least a Republican did something. What is your answer? Just keep letting Republicans act like Democrats?
Agree, Not happy with him on this stuff lately.
That's not unique to Johnson, it's practically a requirement for GOP leadership in Congress.
Johnson is now working very hard to give Biden and the Democrats everything they wanted while getting zero in return — and still nothing has been done about the border. (Less than nothing, actually. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and his Democrats this week disposed of impeachment articles without a trial for Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, whom the House voted to impeach over the border fiasco. Senate Dems, who enjoy an even slimmer majority in their chamber, made it clear there will be no accountability for the Biden administration over the border.)
Johnson is falling into the same trap that all prior Republican leaders from both chambers always find themselves: Republicans believe they are doing the work of the American People; Democrats believe they are doing the work of the Democrat Party. Furthermore, Democrats know that Republicans think this way and use their naïveté as a weapon against them.
Republicans never treat Democrats as dishonest actors, while Democrats always treat Republicans as patsies to be duped. Every time the Republican base tries to build up enough new blood in the caucus in Congress, their leadership makes moves to undermine that effort to protect themselves, and then they go back to DC to be rolled once again by Democrats.
It's demoralizing to watch it happen again and again and again, but we can't stop trying. It's about something I posted very early in my FR career: we are being forced to wander in the desert of DC politics until the last of the Watergate era generation dies off, and then we can cross the River Potomac and begin rebuilding our party.
-PJ
Certainly! During the first hundred days of the Republican-led House, several accomplishments stand out:
Legislation: House Republicans passed 60 pieces of legislation, with 88% of them receiving bipartisan support.
Notably, two common-sense policies had a significant impact:
Ending the Public Health Emergency: This policy compelled President Joe Biden to sign legislation into law, effectively ending the public health emergency.
Overturning D.C.’s Radical Criminal Code Overhaul: Another bipartisan success, this bill forced Biden to abandon veto threats and enact the legislation.
Defunding the IRS: On day one, House Republicans kept their promise by defunding Joe Biden’s army of 87,000 new IRS agents.
Reopening the U.S. Capitol: The doors of the U.S. Capitol were reopened, allowing Americans to witness firsthand how their government operates.
Holding China Accountable: House Republicans declassified information about the origins of COVID-19 and banned the sale of America’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve to China. The House Republicans’ select committee on China continues to seek transparency regarding the CCP’s actions.
Addressing Violent Crime: The House overturned the D.C. City Council’s radical criminal code overhaul, prompting even Biden to acknowledge the city’s crime issue. Unfortunately, 173 House Democrats voted against this common-sense, bipartisan bill.
Additionally, the House Republicans achieved a significant legislative win by passing the H.R.1 – Lower Energy Costs Act. These accomplishments demonstrate their commitment to governance and bipartisan progress.
They did cut $20 billion from the $80 billion IRS budget, but it did NOT defund the new IRS Army!
My answer is for Gaetz and/or MTG to defy Trump and file another motion to vacate, because Johnson is much worse than McCarthy. It didn’t make sense then, but it does now.
He was "on course..."
He was "talking about..."
Remember what McCarthy said when he stepped down? He said he had a deal with Pelosi to "always stand by him" should he get in trouble with his side of the aisle. Guess what? She lied to him.
As I just posted up-thread, Democrats treat Republicans like stooges to be conned; McCarthy was being played for a mark. Nothing that McCarthy was "talking about" or was "on course" to deliver was ever going to happen.
But Democrats were certain to get their half of the "deal" delivered, leaving McCarthy empty-handed.
All Gaetz did was expose the con that is in plain sight to the rest of us. I'm saddened that it doesn't appear that Johnson is seeing it, too. Maybe he did when he began; maybe he's been dunked into the slowly boiling pot and he lost focus on the fact that he's being boiled by the Democrats once again.
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.