Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lepton

Go listen. He was not well prepared to back up his arguments. He missed the ball the entire time. He was tripping all over himself. He was trying to argue from a purely intellectual level without backing anything up with real life examples. Luckily the justices ended up doing that for him later in the proceedings. This is not the kind of lawyer you would want unless you wanted to lose.

Vivafrei covered it live on Rumble. Go listen.


11 posted on 04/17/2024 1:44:39 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Revel

His podcast was on my list for tonight - but that’s still not responsive to what I posted.

The article is about the Solicitor General’s comments. I clarified who the Solicitor General is, and what side he is on. The Solicitor General is not the guy that was doing the arguments about the law being misused in the case of the J6 defendants.


12 posted on 04/17/2024 2:13:26 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson