That’s right, but there is a paradoxical element complicating the abortion issue:
To save unborn babies, pro lifers need to win in politics.
But winning in politics requires strategy.
Strategy involves sacrifice, for example sacrificing a pawn to win in chess.
But the debate over abortion involves unborn human babies, not pawns.
Ironically, the refusal of pro-lifers to accept strategic sacrifice means they will not win, and therefore more lives will be lost.
The answer of course, is for pro-life candidates to advocate the lowest number of weeks during which abortion is permitted - and still win their elections. Advocating too strict a ban and letting the Democrat win will not save a single life.
More lives will be saved if pro-life candidates play it smart and win their elections.
That’s right, but there is a paradoxical element complicating the abortion issue:
To save unborn babies, pro lifers need to win in politics.
But winning in politics requires strategy.
Strategy involves sacrifice, for example sacrificing a pawn to win in chess.
But the debate over abortion involves unborn human babies, not pawns.
Ironically, the refusal of pro-lifers to accept strategic sacrifice means they will not win, and therefore more lives will be lost.
The answer of course, is for pro-life candidates to advocate the lowest number of weeks during which abortion is permitted - and still win their elections. Advocating too strict a ban and letting the Democrat win will not save a single life.
More lives will be saved if pro-life candidates play it smart and win their elections.
EXCELLENT POST.
Why can’t our side understand such common sense? Its the most basic of common sense...........
Christianity is defined by a very gruesome sacrifice. As you say it it does seem odd that it’s not understood.
Nor consider that it is expedient for us, that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not. - John 11:50